Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Richland County

Fund raising to give to other exempt organizations

$810k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$228k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$3.4MHealth$2.3MYouth Development$498kPublic Safety & Disaster$405kHousing & Shelter$288kEducation$23kPhilanthropy$15kArts & Culture$6k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $167k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $632k
$38,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDLY HOUSE$228,433
CATALYST LIFE SERVICES$142,169
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER$94,880
MID-OHIO YOUTH MENTORING$61,000
THIRD STREET COMMUNITY CLINIC$54,250
WAYFINDERS OHIO INC$51,504
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$38,600
YMCA OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC$30,989
SALVATION ARMY$30,550
COMMUNITY ACTION FOR CAPABLE YOUTH$21,250
AMERICAN RED CROSS$16,500
COMMUNITY HEALTH ACCESS PROGRAM$16,000
INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO$13,000
RAEMELTON THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN$6,875
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $491k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $63k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $55k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $55k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $53k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $53k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $32k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $24k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $17k → 15%YMCA OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC: $31k → 15%CLEARFORK VALLEY FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $20k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $15k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $13k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $11k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $10k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $7k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $7k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $6k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.8M · 17 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$6.8M
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
0%

Still filing today

76%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FRIENDLY HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF MANSFIELD OHIO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +11%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +33%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    9× · 2017–2025 · $405k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • CF
    CLEAR FORK VALLEY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +82%
  • UF
    United Fund of Shelby Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -15%
  • MR
    MANSFIELD RICHLAND CO DENTAL CLINIC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muskingum Valley Health Center

To provide affordable, accessible, and quality healthcare.

Health
2
Cleveland Rape Crisis Center

The cleveland rape crisis center is a non-profit organization which supports survivors of sexual violence, promotes healing and prevention, and advocates for social change.

Health
3
Columbus Neighborhood Health Center Inc

To serve the central ohio community with affordable, easy to access healthcare services.

Health
4
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

—
5
Community Health Center of Richmond Inc

The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.

Health
6
The Center for Health Affairs

The mission of the organization is to implement programs and services to improve healthcare throughout northeast ohio.

Health
7
Child & Adolescent Behavioral Health

We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…

—
8
Vermilion County Child Advocacy Center

Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…

Crime & Legal
9
Community Health and Wellness Partners of Logan County

Community health and wellness partners of logan county's mission is to provide quality, whole-person, patient-centered healthcare to anyone and everyone in our community.

Health
10
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
11
The Arc of the Mid Ohio Valley Inc

Mission is to promote and advocate for the welfare of people with intellectual and other developmental disabilities.

—
12
Randolph County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

To facilitate investigation and prosecution of child abuse perpetrators; provide services to victimized children and families; and educate the community.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Young Men's Christian Association of North Central Ohio Inc; the most unlike its peers is Exchange Club Parent Aide Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE FRIENDLY HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF MANSFIELD OHIO: $2,019,958 · Recreation & SportsTHE FRIENDLY HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF M…RAEMELTON THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $109,417 · Recreation & SportsTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,542,716 · HealthTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND…COMMUNITY HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC: $200,975 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH ACCESS PROJE…+2 more: $53,907 · HealthCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF TOLEDO INC: $421,115 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE O…THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC: $387,412 · OtherTHE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTE…Third Street Community Clinic: $378,310 · OtherThird Street Community Clini…THE SALVATION ARMY: $344,812 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCOMMUNITY ACTION FOR CAPABLE YOUTH OF MANSFIELD OHIO: $138,327 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION FOR CAPABLE…+4 more: $79,968 · OtherAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $405,003 · Human ServicesINDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC: $94,303 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC: $30,989 · Human Services+1 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesMID-OHIO YOUTH MENTORING: $339,672 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND COUNCIL INC: $20,016 · Youth DevelopmentWAYFINDERS OHIO INC: $288,297 · Housing & ShelterMansfield Fine Arts Guild Inc: $6,094 · Arts & Culture
Recreation & Sports$2,129,375Health$1,797,598Other$1,749,944Human Services$545,295Youth Development$359,688Housing & Shelter$288,297Arts & Culture$6,094

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FRIENDLY HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF MANSFIELD OHIO: $2,019,958 over 9y, 19% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,542,716 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $405,003 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC: $387,412 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetThird Street Community Clinic: $378,310 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMID-OHIO YOUTH MENTORING: $339,672 over 9y, 20% of budgetWAYFINDERS OHIO INC: $288,297 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC: $200,975 over 9y, 6.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION FOR CAPABLE YOUTH OF MANSFIELD OHIO: $138,327 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetRAEMELTON THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $109,417 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetINDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC: $94,303 over 9y, 6.2% of budgetEXCHANGE CLUB PARENT AIDE PROGRAM: $46,987 over 3y, 14% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC: $30,989 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMansfield Memorial Homes Inc: $30,410 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF MID-OHIO: $23,497 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND COUNCIL INC: $20,016 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCLEAR FORK VALLEY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetUnited Fund of Shelby Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetMansfield Fine Arts Guild Inc: $6,094 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FRIENDLY HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF MANSFIELD OHIO ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Third Street Community Clinic ↗
  • Who funds MID-OHIO YOUTH MENTORING ↗
  • Who funds WAYFINDERS OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION FOR CAPABLE YOUTH OF MANSFIELD OHIO ↗
  • Who funds RAEMELTON THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds EXCHANGE CLUB PARENT AIDE PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds Mansfield Memorial Homes Inc ↗
  • Who funds VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF MID-OHIO ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEAR FORK VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds United Fund of Shelby Inc ↗
  • Who funds CULLIVER READING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Mansfield Fine Arts Guild Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Richland County FoundationOH36.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Richland County Foundation · The Milliron Foundation · The Robert and Esther Black Family Foundation · United Fund of Shelby Inc · The Milton R & Beulah M Young Foundation · The Hire Family Foundation · Ashland County Community Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Ford S N & Ada Fund Pfdn · Gorman Family Foundation · Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Richland County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Richland County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Richland County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph