· Private foundation
The Milton R & Beulah M Young Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 86% of THE MILTON R & BEULAH M YOUNG FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| RICHLAND ACADAMY OF THE ARTS | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| THIRD STREET HEALTH SERVICES | $3,600 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,675 |
| MATTHEW 25 OUTREACH CENTER | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| WOODVILLE GRACE FOOD PANTRY | $2,500 |
| ST TIMOTHY'S LUTHERAN CHURCH | $2,500 |
| PROJECT ONE | $2,500 |
| MID OHIO YOUTH MENTOR | $2,500 |
| GRACE EPISCOPAL FOOD BANK | $2,500 |
| FRIENDLY HOUSE | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES FOOD BANK | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.
56 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHARMONY HOUSE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue ×28
- TFTHE FRIENDLY HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF MANSFIELD OHIO8× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +24%
- TDTHE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $18k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- SPST PETERST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETone grant, 2017 · $8k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $5k
- CHCHAPEL HILL CHURCHone grant, 2017 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Museum
OHAC's mission is to foster and promote affordable housing in the state of Ohio through:1) education and training of its members and general public; 2) exchange of information; 3) mutual support; 4) collaborate efforts.
To provide access to quality primary health care to the medically underserved population of the tri-state ohio valley.
Our mission is to improve the quality of life, ensure dignity and respect for persons with mental illness, and to support their families.
Hospice of northwest ohio provides specialized medical, emotional and spiritual care to people of all ages impacted by any life-limiting illness.
To create a better world by serving people in need by operating food pantries, homeless shelters, a domestic violence shelter, affordable housing communities, senior living, assisted living and skilled care facilities, a home health care…
Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.
The goal is to promote all types of agriculture in the county and surrounding areas during the year and finalizing with the seven day fair.
Luther home of mercy (lhm) is a ministry enriching lives and individual abilities, serving people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
To inspire people to embrace their callings in creation and community by connecting people with nature and faith.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Richland County Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Associated Charities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 23. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HARMONY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDLY HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF MANSFIELD OHIO ↗
- Who funds THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds MATTHEW 25 OUTREACH CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTH CENTRAL STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATED CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND ACADEMY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Richland County Foundation · The Robert and Esther Black Family Foundation · Ashland County Community Foundation · Edith B & Joseph E Humphrey Family Foundation · The Hire Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Milliron Foundation · Gorman Family Foundation · Ford S N & Ada Fund Pfdn · United Way of Richland County · Shelby Ohio Community Foundation of Richland County · The Pryor Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Milton R & Beulah M Young Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.