Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Richland County

Fund raising to give to other exempt organizations

$810k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$228k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$3.4MHealth$2.3MYouth Development$498kPublic Safety & Disaster$405kHousing & Shelter$288kEducation$23kPhilanthropy$15kArts & Culture$6k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $167k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $632k
$38,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDLY HOUSE$228,433
CATALYST LIFE SERVICES$142,169
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER$94,880
MID-OHIO YOUTH MENTORING$61,000
THIRD STREET COMMUNITY CLINIC$54,250
WAYFINDERS OHIO INC$51,504
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$38,600
YMCA OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC$30,989
SALVATION ARMY$30,550
COMMUNITY ACTION FOR CAPABLE YOUTH$21,250
AMERICAN RED CROSS$16,500
COMMUNITY HEALTH ACCESS PROGRAM$16,000
INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO$13,000
RAEMELTON THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN$6,875
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $491k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $63k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $55k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $55k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $53k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $53k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $32k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $24k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $17k → 15%YMCA OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC: $31k → 15%CLEARFORK VALLEY FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $20k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $15k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $13k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $11k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $10k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $7k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $7k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $6k → 15%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NCO: $6k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.8M · 17 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
5

Total granted

$6.8M
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
0%

Still filing today

76%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FRIENDLY HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF MANSFIELD OHIO
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +24%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +33%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    9× · 2017–2025 · $405k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • UF
    United Fund of Shelby Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -15%
  • CF
    CLEAR FORK VALLEY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +82%
  • MR
    MANSFIELD RICHLAND CO DENTAL CLINIC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muskingum Valley Health Center

To provide affordable, accessible, and quality healthcare.

Health
2
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

3
Greater Cleveland Volunteers

Greater cleveland volunteers enriches the community and indivuduals through volunteer service. volunteers age 18 and older are recruited and placed in the agency's programs or referred to local nonprofit or public organizations to help…

Philanthropy
4
Columbus Neighborhood Health Center Inc

To serve the central ohio community with affordable, easy to access healthcare services.

Health
5
Cleveland Rape Crisis Center

The cleveland rape crisis center is a non-profit organization which supports survivors of sexual violence, promotes healing and prevention, and advocates for social change.

Health
6
The Arc of the Mid Ohio Valley Inc

Mission is to promote and advocate for the welfare of people with intellectual and other developmental disabilities.

7
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
8
Ohio United Way

To strengthen the capacity of United Ways across Ohio and to advance the common good for Ohioans.

Philanthropy
9
The Center for Health Affairs

The mission of the organization is to implement programs and services to improve healthcare throughout northeast ohio.

Health
10
Community Health Center of Richmond Inc

The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.

Health
11
United Way of Cleveland County Inc

The United Way of Cleveland County helps people by uniting resources and programs to responsibly meet the needs of our community.

Philanthropy
12
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-Ohio Youth Mentoring and the most unlike its peers is Exchange Club Parent Aide Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 26. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number14%0%<5yr11%0%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr11%30%20–35yr18%25%35–55yr26%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value14%0%<5yr11%0%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr11%17%20–35yr18%31%35–55yr26%48%55yr+

The field is 14% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 9% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
9%
2/23
the rest of the field
10%
69/725

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE FRIENDLY HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF MANSFIELD OHIO — $2,019,958 · Recreation & SportsTHE FRIENDLY HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF M…RAEMELTON THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC — $109,417 · Recreation & SportsTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $1,542,716 · HealthTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND…COMMUNITY HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC — $200,975 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH ACCESS PROJE…+2 more — $53,907 · HealthCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF TOLEDO INC — $421,115 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE O…THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC — $387,412 · OtherTHE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTE…Third Street Community Clinic — $378,310 · OtherThird Street Community Clini…THE SALVATION ARMY — $344,812 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCOMMUNITY ACTION FOR CAPABLE YOUTH OF MANSFIELD OHIO — $138,327 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION FOR CAPABLE…+4 more — $79,968 · OtherAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $405,003 · Human ServicesINDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC — $94,303 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC — $30,989 · Human Services+1 more — $15,000 · Human ServicesMID-OHIO YOUTH MENTORING — $339,672 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND COUNCIL INC — $20,016 · Youth DevelopmentWAYFINDERS OHIO INC — $288,297 · Housing & ShelterMansfield Fine Arts Guild Inc — $6,094 · Arts & Culture
Recreation & Sports$2,129,375Health$1,797,598Other$1,749,944Human Services$545,295Youth Development$359,688Housing & Shelter$288,297Arts & Culture$6,094

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE FRIENDLY HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF MANSFIELD OHIO — $2,019,958 over 9y, 19% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $1,542,716 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $405,003 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC — $387,412 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetThird Street Community Clinic — $378,310 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMID-OHIO YOUTH MENTORING — $339,672 over 9y, 20% of budgetWAYFINDERS OHIO INC — $288,297 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC — $200,975 over 9y, 6.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION FOR CAPABLE YOUTH OF MANSFIELD OHIO — $138,327 over 9y, 6.5% of budgetRAEMELTON THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC — $109,417 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetINDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC — $94,303 over 9y, 6.2% of budgetEXCHANGE CLUB PARENT AIDE PROGRAM — $46,987 over 3y, 14% of budgetMansfield Memorial Homes Inc — $30,410 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetVISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF MID-OHIO — $23,497 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND COUNCIL INC — $20,016 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUnited Fund of Shelby Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetCLEAR FORK VALLEY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetMansfield Fine Arts Guild Inc — $6,094 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FRIENDLY HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF MANSFIELD OHIO
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC
  • Who funds Third Street Community Clinic
  • Who funds MID-OHIO YOUTH MENTORING
  • Who funds WAYFINDERS OHIO INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION FOR CAPABLE YOUTH OF MANSFIELD OHIO
  • Who funds RAEMELTON THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC
  • Who funds EXCHANGE CLUB PARENT AIDE PROGRAM
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTH CENTRAL OHIO INC
  • Who funds Mansfield Memorial Homes Inc
  • Who funds VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF MID-OHIO
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF OHIO'S HEARTLAND COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds United Fund of Shelby Inc
  • Who funds CLEAR FORK VALLEY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CULLIVER READING CENTER
  • Who funds Mansfield Fine Arts Guild Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Richland County FoundationOH36.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Richland County Foundation · The Milliron Foundation · The Robert and Esther Black Family Foundation · United Fund of Shelby Inc · The Milton R & Beulah M Young Foundation · The Hire Family Foundation · Ashland County Community Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Ford S N & Ada Fund Pfdn · Gorman Family Foundation · Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Richland County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph