Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Pekin

The mission of both the national united way and the UNITED WAY OF PEKIN is to increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another.

$248k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$1.5MYouth Development$391kCrime & Legal$237kHealth$210kFood & Nutrition$175kPublic Safety & Disaster$73kHousing & Shelter$10kCommunity Improvement$6k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$23,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$466k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE$40,000
SALVATION ARMY$37,500
CASA$25,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PEKIN$25,000
TCRC INC$25,000
PEKIN OUTREACH INITIATIVE$23,500
MILLER SENIOR CENTER$21,000
PEKIN YWCA$18,500
FAMILY CORE$12,500
TAZEWELL CO CHILDRENS ADVOCACY$12,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $579k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PEKIN YWCA: $66k → 9%PEKIN YWCA: $66k → 9%FAMILY CORE: $26k → 14%PEKIN YWCA: $64k → 9%FAMILY CORE: $20k → 14%FAMILY CORE: $20k → 14%PEKIN YWCA: $51k → 9%FAMILY CORE: $20k → 14%PEKIN YWCA: $51k → 9%FAMILY CORE: $18k → 14%FAMILY CORE: $16k → 14%FAMILY CORE: $13k → 14%PEKIN YWCA: $34k → 9%FAMILY CORE: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $14k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $14k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $14k → 14%PEKIN YWCA: $19k → 9%PEKIN YWCA: $14k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 17 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
1

Total granted

$2.6M
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+43%

Still filing today

76%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalFood & NutritionReligionCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PEKIN
    8× · 2018–2025 · $367k · revenue +8%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $352k · revenue +39%
  • CA
    COUNSELING AND FAMILY SERVICES INC DBA FAMILYCORE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $142k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • HO
    HEART OF ILLINOIS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Child Advocacy Center of Mchenry Co Inc

Provide Counselors in Child Abuse Situations

Crime & Legal
2
Center for Family Services

Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…

Human Services
3
Childrens Advocacy Center of East Central Illinois

To assist children who have been victims of abuse

Crime & Legal
4
Casa of South Central Illinois

The trained volunteers of CASA of South Central Illinois will work with legal and child welfare professionals, educators, and service providers to advocate for the best interests of children that have experienced abuse and/or neglect that…

—
5
Casa of the Illinois Valley

Provide legal services for children in area.

Human Services
6
Casa of West Central Illinois

To advocate for abused and neglected children in the legal welfare system.

Crime & Legal
7
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Cook County

CASA of Cook County's vision is to protect abused and neglected children by providing them in court, a safe and permanent home, and an opportunity to grow, learn and thrive.

Crime & Legal
8
West Central Illinois Case Coordination Unit

To promptly and efficiently promote and provide a wide array of programs to meet the needs of the elderly, their families and those who care for them in a confidential and professional manner.

Unclassified
9
April House

The mission of april house is to decrease the incidence of child sexual abuse and trauma by brining help systems together to intervene in a humane and responsive manner.

Crime & Legal
10
Youth Service Bureau

The Youth Service Bureau provides services to at-risk youth who are, or are at risk of becoming, runaway, abused, neglected and/or homeless. Services are also available for their family members.

—
11
Illinois Association of Court Appointed Special Advocates

Supports and promotes court appointed volunteer advocacy for children who have experienced abuse or neglect.

Civil Rights
12
Casa of Southeastern Illinois Inc

Provide court appointed advocates for children

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Youth and Family Solutions; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Tazewell County Cac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $391,026 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PEKIN: $367,367 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PEKINTHE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE: $352,367 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSESt Francis Community Clinic: $210,143 · OtherSt Francis Community ClinicPEKIN PARK DISTRICT: $157,791 · OtherPEKIN PARK DISTRICTPEKIN MOBILE DINER INC: $65,831 · Other+1 more: $17,823 · OtherYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PEKIN: $364,301 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASS…COUNSELING AND FAMILY SERVICES INC DBA FAMILYCORE: $141,717 · Human ServicesCOUNSELING AND FAMILY SERVI…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $73,206 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross…THE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $35,332 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FA…CASA OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT: $99,996 · Crime & LegalCASA OF TH…FRIENDS OF TAZEWELL COUNTY CAC: $82,996 · Crime & LegalFRIENDS OF…PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $54,129 · Crime & LegalPRAIRIE ST…PEKIN OUTREACH INITIATIVE: $109,057 · Food & NutritionCHRISTIAN CIVIC OUTREACH FOR THE PEKIN AREA CHURCH: $18,778 · ReligionNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $16,000 · Community ImprovementHEART OF ILLINOIS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $6,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,562,348Human Services$614,556Crime & Legal$237,121Food & Nutrition$109,057Religion$18,778Community Improvement$16,000Youth Development$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PEKIN: $367,367 over 8y, 16% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PEKIN: $364,301 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE: $352,367 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCOUNSELING AND FAMILY SERVICES INC DBA FAMILYCORE: $141,717 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetPEKIN OUTREACH INITIATIVE: $109,057 over 7y, 20% of budgetCASA OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT: $99,996 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF TAZEWELL COUNTY CAC: $82,996 over 7y, 85% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $73,206 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEKIN MOBILE DINER INC: $65,831 over 7y, 21% of budgetPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $54,129 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $35,332 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWD BOYCE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $17,823 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $16,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHEART OF ILLINOIS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $6,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF PEKIN ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF PEKIN ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF ABUSE ↗
  • Who funds St Francis Community Clinic ↗
  • Who funds COUNSELING AND FAMILY SERVICES INC DBA FAMILYCORE ↗
  • Who funds PEKIN OUTREACH INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF TAZEWELL COUNTY CAC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds PEKIN MOBILE DINER INC ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILY SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CIVIC OUTREACH FOR THE PEKIN AREA CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds WD BOYCE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF ILLINOIS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Heart of Illinois United Way IncIL17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Heart of Illinois United Way Inc · Peoria Area Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Cakora Family Charitable Trust · Barton Family Foundation Dtd 4242013 · Edward Jones Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Pekin funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Pekin. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Pekin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph