Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Knox County Inc

To strengthen knox county communities by fostering volunteer action, building resources, and caring for individuals

$112k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$256kCrime & Legal$186kFood & Nutrition$104kRecreation & Sports$90kYouth Development$78kCommunity Improvement$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kEmployment$6k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $75,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $111,697 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $36,197 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$868k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VNA COMMUNITY SERVICES$10,000
GORDON BEHRENTS SENIOR CENTER$10,000
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE$10,000
FISH OF GALESBURG$10,000
PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES$10,000
ALTERNATIVES OF OLDER ADULTS$7,500
CENTER FOR YOUTH & FAMILY SOLUTIONS$6,000
GALESBURG YOUTH ATHLETIC CLUB$6,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $152k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA OF KNOX COUNTY: $24k → 15%YMCA OF KNOX COUNTY: $24k → 15%FISH OF GALESBURG: $19k → 15%FISH OF GALESBURG: $17k → 15%FISH OF GALESBURG: $15k → 15%FISH OF GALESBURG: $13k → 15%FISH OF GALESBURG: $10k → 15%FISH OF GALESBURG: $10k → 15%FISH OF GALESBURG: $10k → 15%FISH OF GALESBURG: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$725k · 13 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$725k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+1%

Still filing today

69%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $105k · revenue +111%
  • FO
    FISH OF GALESBURG
    8× · 2017–2024 · $104k · revenue +175%
  • VC
    VNA Community Service
    7× · 2018–2024 · $85k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CC
    CARVER COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
  • WI
    WESTERN ILLINOIS REGIONAL COUNCIL - COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +1%
  • GI
    GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
2
Central Illinois Service Access Inc

Our mission is to maximize independence for individuals with disabilities through choice, advocacy and service access.

—
3
Voluntary Action Center of Northern Illinois

Voluntary Action Center, which serves Bureau, Dekalb, Kendall, Lasalle and Putnam counties provides high quality services that address the basic transportation and nutrition needs of its communities.

Philanthropy
4
Central Illinois Agency On Aging Inc

Central illinois agency on aging believes in the independence and dignity of older persons, and that each older person should be empowered to exert control over their own life & have access to needed services. we do planning, program…

—
5
Northwestern Il Area Agency On Aging

To enable older persons to live in dignity and independence.

—
6
Seniors Assistance Center

Seniors Assistance Center provides necessary services to senior citizens of unincorporated Norwood Park Township, and the villages of Norridge and Harwood Heights. These services include home delivered meals, information and assistance,…

—
7
Service Inc of Illinois

Service Inc. of Illinois was formed in 1989 to provide screening, assessment, evaluation, service planning, referral, linkage, follow-up, & related services to individuals with developmental disabilities and/or developmental delays in 17…

Human Services
8
West Central Illinois Area Agency On Aging

Services for the elderly

—
9
Wabash Valley Goodwill Inc

Goodwill industries is a nonprofit provider of employment and other critical community based services for people who have a disability, people who lack education or job experience, households facing economic challenges, and others in need.

Employment
10
West Central Illinois Case Coordination Unit

To promptly and efficiently promote and provide a wide array of programs to meet the needs of the elderly, their families and those who care for them in a confidential and professional manner.

Unclassified
11
Northern Illinois Center for Nonprofit Excellence

To support not for profit organizations in innovation, excellence and leadership in their communities.

Community Improvement
12
Community Workshop & Training Center Inc

Our central Illinois organization provides programs and services to adults with disabilities; enriching their quality of life, promoting social change, and optimizing their potential for independence.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kccdd Inc; the most unlike its peers is Triumph Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VNA Community Service: $85,120 · OtherVNA Community ServiceTHE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $78,002 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICESKCCDD INC: $62,204 · OtherKCCDD INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $46,520 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYGALESBURG YOUTH ATHLETIC CLUB: $24,027 · OtherGALESBURG YOUTH ATHLETIC CLUBKNOX COUNTY TEEN COURT: $21,714 · OtherKNOX COUNTY TEEN COURTCARVER COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $16,548 · OtherALTERNATIVES FOR THE OLDER ADULT INC: $13,835 · Other+1 more: $6,335 · OtherFISH OF GALESBURG: $103,673 · Human ServicesFISH OF GALESBURGTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KNOX COUNTY ILLINOIS: $47,976 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $18,192 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cro…PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $104,632 · Crime & LegalPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERV…CASA OF WEST CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $59,234 · Crime & LegalCASA OF WEST CENTRAL ILL…TRIUMPH SERVICES INC: $59,749 · Recreation & SportsTRIUMPH S…WHY NOT NOW INC: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsWHY NOT N…WESTERN ILLINOIS REGIONAL COUNCIL - COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $7,750 · Education
Other$354,305Human Services$169,841Crime & Legal$163,866Recreation & Sports$65,749Education$7,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $104,632 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFISH OF GALESBURG: $103,673 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetVNA Community Service: $85,120 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetKCCDD INC: $62,204 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTRIUMPH SERVICES INC: $59,749 over 6y, 20% of budgetCASA OF WEST CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $59,234 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KNOX COUNTY ILLINOIS: $47,976 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $18,192 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALTERNATIVES FOR THE OLDER ADULT INC: $13,835 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN ILLINOIS REGIONAL COUNCIL - COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $7,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $6,335 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHY NOT NOW INC: $6,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FISH OF GALESBURG ↗
  • Who funds VNA Community Service ↗
  • Who funds KCCDD INC ↗
  • Who funds TRIUMPH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF WEST CENTRAL ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KNOX COUNTY ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ALTERNATIVES FOR THE OLDER ADULT INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN ILLINOIS REGIONAL COUNCIL - COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds WHY NOT NOW INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Galesburg Community FoundationIL22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Galesburg Community Foundation · Donald E Fike Family Foundation · Western Illinois Area Agency on Aging · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Knox County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Knox County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Knox County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph