How much did United Way of Greater Kingsport Inc grant in FY2025?

Philanthropy$5.1MYouth Development$3.9MHealth$3.9MHuman Services$3.5MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.3MFood & Nutrition$1.0MCrime & Legal$996kRecreation & Sports$955kOther$0

02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k23 grants · $525k
$50k–250k14 grants · $1.3M

$33,796

Median grant

States reached

$4.5M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
FRONTIER HEALTH	$166,712
GIRLS INC	$137,272
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF KINGSPORT	$130,000
KINGSPORT CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER	$115,367
MEALS ON WHEELS OF KINGSPORT	$110,000
UNITED WAY OF EAST TN HIGHLANDS	$96,665
AMERICAN RED CROSS	$85,000
THE SALVATION ARMY	$84,600
FRIENDS IN NEED HEALTH CENTER	$80,200
UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWEST VA	$75,047
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF TRI	$58,097
UNITED WAY OF HAWKINS COUNTY	$56,943
GRAY COMMUNITY CHEST	$54,892
MOUNTAIN REGION SPEECH AND HEARING	$51,900
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER	$48,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$22M · 47 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

47 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$22M

$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%

+24%

Still filing today

77%

57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

PhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FH
FRONTIER HEALTH
9× · 2017–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +68%
GI
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF KINGSPORT
9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +28% · 42% of their budget
BG
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER KINGSPORT INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +44%

Funded once

GK
GREATER KINGSPORT FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +27%
AS
APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INCgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +83%
SC
SULLIVAN CO ANTI-DRUG COALITION
one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

United Way of Wilson County & the Upper Cumberland

The United Way of Wilson County exists to enhance the quality of life through a combined effort of individuals and organizations pulling together to address health and human service needs in Wilson County and the Upper Cumberland.

Human Services

Volunteer East Tennessee

Volunteer East Tennessee inspires service by equipping organizations and mobilizing volunteers to connect with one another and strengthen communities.

—

Roane County United Way Inc

To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of roane county. we are focused on community safety, children's services, and family

Philanthropy

The Samaritan Center Inc

To meet the basic physical, spiritual, and social need of people in our area using the ministry of Jesus as a model.

Religion

We Care Community Services Inc

The we care mission is to serve economically disadvantaged residents of rhea county, tn by enabling them to help themselves. (offering a hand up not a hand out)

Human Services

United Way of Franklin County

Our mission is to focus on the power of giving by promoting volunteerism and mobilizing financial resources to eliminate the countys compelling human service needs

—

Court Appointed Special Advocates

To be the voice for children who have been victims of abuse and/or neglect. Our vision is to serve every child in the Cheaha Region by providing them with a caring and competent trained volunteer.

Crime & Legal

United Way of Northeast Kentucky

Solicit Funds for Charitable and Civic Work

Philanthropy

Greater Chattanooga Christian Services Inc

Provide Group and Foster care for Homeless Children and Counseling

Human Services

Anderson County Community Action Inc

The Anderson County Community Action Commission provides food, clothing, household foods, and essential assistance to low-income residents of Anderson County, Tennessee. The organization operates a community food pantry, clothing closet,…

—

Blue Grass Community Action Partnership Inc

Provide social services to a nine-county area of central kentucky.

Human Services

Signal Mountain Social Services

Address the needs of individuals living within the 37377 zip code during times of financial challenge and crisis, with a longer-term focus of uniquely supporting each client on their path to self-reliance.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Upper East Tennessee Human Development Agency and the most unlike its peers is Girl Scout Council of the Southern Appalachians Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/54

the rest of the field

12%

144/1,231

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

40/49

Grantees still filing

36/49

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$8,997,127Philanthropy$5,567,231Health$3,848,043Human Services$1,628,416Youth Development$862,231Crime & Legal$425,536Civil Rights$418,964

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Speedway Children's CharitiesNC23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Speedway Children's Charities · United Way of Bristol Tn-Va Inc · The James and Laura Rogers Foundation · Eastman Foundation · JS & JR King Foundation · Eastman Credit Union · Food City Charitable Foundation · Ballad Health Foundation · Wellmont Health System · East Tennessee Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Greater Kingsport Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home