Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Danville Area Inc

To reduce poverty, financial and volunteer contributions are solicited to support programs and resources that improve people's health, educational and financial stability opportunities.

$271k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$493kFood & Nutrition$405kYouth Development$393kCrime & Legal$205kHuman Services$100kArts & Culture$23kEmployment$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $240,234, the rows itemized in this filing. The $270,695 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,461 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$28,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$715k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRIS SENIOR SERVICES$45,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$36,333
CROSSPOINT HUMAN SERVICES$34,000
Individual grant recipient$28,231
GATEWAY FAMILY SERVICES OF ILLINOIS$28,000
DOLLY PARTON IMAGINATION LIBRARY$22,670
PEER COURT INC$15,000
SALVATION ARMY$11,000
SURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER$10,000
CASA OF VERMILION COUNTY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%COMMUNITY ACTION PROG WEST IND: $8k → 12%COMMUNITY ACTION PROG WEST IND: $7k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 15 repeat orgs$39k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against -49% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$1.7M
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-49%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CRIS Healthy Aging
    7× · 2019–2025 · $405k · revenue +50%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $361k · revenue +37%
  • C
    CROSSPOINT
    7× · 2019–2025 · $356k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • WE
    WORKSOURCE ENTERPRISES
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
2
Vermilion County Child Advocacy Center

Perform forensic interviews on minor children in response to calls from either the Department of Children and Family Services or law enforcement, regarding potential abuse of the child. The Center works as an advocate for the child with…

Crime & Legal
3
Tecumseh Area Partnership Inc

Employment and training services

Employment
4
Community Counseling Centers of Chicago Inc

To Provide counseling, crisis intervention, case management, psychosocial rehabilitative and vocational services to mentally ill and substance abuse clients in outpatient and community based settings.

Health
5
Community Workshop & Training Center Inc

Our central Illinois organization provides programs and services to adults with disabilities; enriching their quality of life, promoting social change, and optimizing their potential for independence.

Human Services
6
Goodwill Industries of Northern Il and Wi Stateline Area Inc

The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…

—
7
Childrens Advocacy Center of East Central Illinois

To assist children who have been victims of abuse

Crime & Legal
8
Options and Advocacy for Mchenry County Inc

Empowering individuals with developmental disabilities and their families through advocacy and the coordination of service options

Human Services
9
North Central Mental Health Services Inc

To provide mental health and drug addiction services.

Health
10
Schuyler County Mental Health Associatio

Counseling & support to those in need

Health
11
Service Inc of Illinois

Service Inc. of Illinois was formed in 1989 to provide screening, assessment, evaluation, service planning, referral, linkage, follow-up, & related services to individuals with developmental disabilities and/or developmental delays in 17…

Human Services
12
Cornerstone Counseling Ctr Chicago

Cornerstone Counseling empowers people to reach their spiritual, relational, and emotional potential through exceptional counseling and personal development services.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crosspoint; the most unlike its peers is Vermilion County Rape Crisis Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRIS Healthy Aging: $405,000 · OtherCRIS Healthy AgingBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLE: $361,333 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLEPEER COURT INC: $108,000 · OtherPEER COURT INCIndividual grant recipient: $79,603 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSURVIVOR RESOURCE CENTER: $43,000 · Other+7 more: $141,920 · Other+7 moreCROSSPOINT: $355,500 · HealthCROSSPOINTGATEWAY FAMILY SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $92,000 · HealthGATEWAY FAMILY SERVICES OF ILLI…VERMILION COUNTY RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $24,250 · HealthCASA OF VERMILION COUNTY: $72,500 · Crime & LegalCommunity Action Program Inc of Western Indiana: $15,000 · Human ServicesWORKSOURCE ENTERPRISES: $5,060 · Employment
Other$1,138,856Health$471,750Crime & Legal$72,500Human Services$15,000Employment$5,060

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCRIS Healthy Aging: $405,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLE: $361,333 over 7y, 14% of budgetCROSSPOINT: $355,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetPEER COURT INC: $108,000 over 7y, 31% of budgetGATEWAY FAMILY SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $92,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetCASA OF VERMILION COUNTY: $72,500 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetVERMILION COUNTY RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $24,250 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetROSECRANCE INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Action Program Inc of Western Indiana: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CRIS Healthy Aging ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF DANVILLE ↗
  • Who funds CROSSPOINT ↗
  • Who funds PEER COURT INC ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY FAMILY SERVICES OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF VERMILION COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Prairie Center Health Systems Inc ↗
  • Who funds VERMILION COUNTY RAPE CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ROSECRANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Action Program Inc of Western Indiana ↗
  • Who funds WORKSOURCE ENTERPRISES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Iroquois Federal Foundation IncIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Iroquois Federal Foundation Inc · Vermilion Healthcare Foundation · John P Cadle Foundation · Community Foundation of East Central Illinois · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Danville Area Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Danville Area Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Danville Area’s filings →

    More from the funding graph