· Public charity
United Way of Central Louisiana Inc
United way of central louisiana, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $94,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $102,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $83k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY NETWORK | $15,500 |
| HOPE HOUSE OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA | $15,500 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $11,000 |
| RAPIDES PARISH SCHOOL BOARD | $10,500 |
| YWCA OF ALEXANDRIA-PINVEILLE | $10,500 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA | $10,000 |
| FAITH HOUSE | $10,000 |
| CENTRAL LOUISIANA AIDS SUPPORT SERVICES | $6,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $302k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HHHOPE HOUSE OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA7× · 2018–2024 · $338k · revenue +25%
- CACHILDREN'S ADVOCACY NETWORK INC7× · 2018–2024 · $276k · revenue +103%
- LPLOUISIANA PURCHASE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC6× · 2018–2023 · $131k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- ICIBERIA COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide a child-oriented, multidisciplinary forensice interview enviroment facility and counseling center for victims of abuse and their families.
The Organization is dedicated to bringing about change in institutions, laws, politics, attitudes, and beliefs which will allow individuals to live free of violence.
The Capital Area Alliance for the Homeless (CAAH) holds the fundamental belief that everyone, no matter how deprived in circumstances of housing and necessities is valued, entitled to dignity and respect, and deserving of community…
Using direct representation and advocacy, we fight to keep children out of the justice system so that they can thrive in their homes and communities.
Child advocacy services gives voice, healing, and security to children in ten parishes in southeast louisiana through its casa program, children's advocacy program, and prevention education.
Agency delivers outpatient mental health counseling to at risk youth and families in St. Charles Parish, Louisiana.
Casa - new orleans trains volunteers to become court appointed special advocates for abused and neglected children in the juvenile justice system.
The organization is a partnership of agencies dedicated to ending family violence, child abuse, sexual assault, and stalking through prevention and coordinated response by providing comprehensive client-centered, empowerment services in a…
Pine hills children's advocacy center, inc. was created to assist survivors of sexual and violent crimes and their families and to lessen the trauma for child victims of sexual and severe abuse. the center is located in ruston, louisiana…
To provide love, care, and a positive christian witness for children and families in need.
To provide education to the people of southwest louisiana about hiv/aids, hiv prevention, and to offer medical and social services to people living with hiv.
The northwest arkansas women's shelter is committed to serving victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and empowering them to build lives free of violence.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Central Louisiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Family Justice Center of Central Louisiana Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF ALEXANDRIA-PINEVILLE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA PURCHASE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL LOUISIANA COALITION TO PREVENT HOMELESSNESS INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF LA-PINES TO THE GULF (FORMERLY BAYOU GIRL SCOUT COUNCILINC) ↗
- Who funds Faith House Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL LOUISIANA AIDS SUPPORT SERVICE ↗
- Who funds AVOYELLES SOCIETY FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED INC ↗
- Who funds IBERIA COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE WELLSPRING ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of SWLA Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Virginia Martin Howard Foundation · The Rapides Foundation · Louisiana Bar Foundation · Christus Health · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Central Louisiana Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.