Skip to content

· Public charity

United Way of Beaumont & North Jefferson County

Provide visionary leadership in uniting the community's resources of donors, volunteers, and nonprofit organizations to address community needs in a trustworthy and accountable way

$769k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$147k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$3.1MHealth$3.0MFood & Nutrition$2.4MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.3MYouth Development$1.2MCrime & Legal$480kEducation$438kHousing & Shelter$74kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $229k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $527k
$33,805
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS$147,147
SALVATION ARMY$114,945
RECOVERY COUNCIL OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS$95,057
SHORKEY CENTER$88,833
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$80,849
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS$47,310
GIRL SCOUTS$40,225
RAPE & SUICIDE CRISIS CTR$33,805
BOY SCOUNTS OF AMERICA$29,846
FAMILY SERVICES$19,939
SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK$18,497
CASA OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS$16,515
ARC OF GREATER BEAUMONT$12,192
SAMARITAN COUNSELING CTR$11,041
FAMILY SERVICES$5,297
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Southeast Texas Hospice: $40k → 14%Southeast Texas Hospice: $22k → 14%Southeast Texas Hospice: $20k → 14%Southeast Texas Hospice: $19k → 14%Catholic Charities: $280k → 19%Nutrition & Services: $225k → 19%Nutrition & Services: $220k → 19%Nutrition & Services for Seniors: $220k → 19%Nutrition & Services for Seniors: $188k → 19%Nutrition & Services for Seniors: $175k → 19%NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $152k → 19%Nutrition & Services for Seniors: $150k → 19%NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $147k → 19%NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $141k → 19%Catholic Charities: $125k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $81k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $73k → 19%Catholic Charities: $70k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $62k → 19%Catholic Charities: $58k → 19%Catholic Charities: $58k → 19%Catholic Charities: $50k → 19%Nutrition & Services for Seniors: $50k → 19%Catholic Charities: $50k → 19%Nutrition & Services for Seniors: $50k → 19%Catholic Charities: $38k → 19%Family Services: $193k → 19%Family Services: $178k → 19%Family Services: $178k → 19%Family Services: $125k → 19%Family Services: $109k → 19%Family Services: $89k → 19%Family Services: $36k → 19%Southeast Texas Family Resource Center: $25k → 19%Southeast Texas Family Resource Center: $25k → 19%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FAMILY RESOURCE CTR: $23k → 19%Southeast Texas Family Resource Center: $23k → 19%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FAMILY RESOURCE CTR: $22k → 19%Southeast Texas Family Resource Center: $20k → 19%Southeast Texas Family Resource Center: $20k → 19%Southeast Texas Family Resource Center: $20k → 19%FAMILY SERVICES: $20k → 19%Samaritan Counseling Center: $20k → 19%Boy's Have of America Inc: $40k → 19%Boy's Have of America Inc: $37k → 19%Boy's Have of America Inc: $36k → 19%Boy's Have of America Inc: $31k → 19%Boy's Haven of America: $21k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 22 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against -32% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
7

Total granted

$12M
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
-32%

Still filing today

91%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +7%
  • RC
    Recovery Council of Southeast Texas
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +60%
  • RL
    RICHARD L SHORKEY EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +128%

Funded once

  • BC
    BRED CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $45k
  • IO
    ICONNECT OUTREACH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -99%
  • TG
    THE GENERAL COUNCIL ON FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNITED METHO
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Texas Rural Health Services

South Texas Rural Health Services, Inc. provides charitable health services, including the recruitment of health care personnel to the rural service area, and primarily serves the low income population.

Health
2
Southeast Arkansas Behavioral Healthcare

To create an environment where staff is conscientious to the behavioral health needs of the area in a manner which is client oriented, accessible, affordable, and quality driven.

Health
3
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
4
Senior Citizens Services of Texarkana

Support Services for the elderly through nutritional assistance

Human Services
5
How Center

The H.O.W. Center provides a safe and structured living environment for individuals recovering from alcoholism and addiction while they gain the skills they need to live independently and successfully.

—
6
South Taylor Emergency Medical Serv

To provide efficient, effective, and professional prehospital emergency care and transportation to those living in the unincorporated areas of Taylor County, Texas and as requested by municipalities in Taylor County

—
7
Special Abilities of North Texas Inc

To provide the highest quality care, training and support to adults with special needs, giving them opportunities to succeed in life.

Human Services
8
Community Action Corporation of South Texas

To continuously improve the lives of South Texans by providing high quality health care, education, housing and economic opportunities to reduce poverty through services and partnerships.

Human Services
9
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
10
South Central Houston Action Council Inc

The organization provides medical services in the form of primary and preventive care to underserved and underinsured residents of harris county.

—
11
Behavioral Health Solutions of South Texas

To develop and implement effective age-appropriate, consumer-driven, evidence-based services to prevent and reduce substance use and strengthen mental wellness across the southernmost Texas communities.

Human Services
12
Summerhouse Houston

Summerhouse Houston's supports adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), their familites, and our community through employment, volunterism, and partnerships to foster a culture of belonging, choice and respect.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Services of Southeast Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Bred Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $1,747,275 · Human ServicesNUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORSFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $980,835 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INCCatholic Charities of Southeast Texas: $943,802 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of Southeast TexasSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc: $818,778 · Human ServicesSoutheast Texas Food Bank IncBoys Haven of America Inc: $193,768 · Human ServicesSoutheast Texas Family Resource Center Inc: $187,525 · Human Services+3 more: $279,590 · Human Services+3 moreRecovery Council of Southeast Texas: $1,425,574 · OtherRecovery Council of Southeast TexasThe Salvation Army: $1,410,637 · OtherThe Salvation ArmyBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - THREE RIVERS COUNCIL: $569,327 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - THREE RIVERS COUNC…RAPE & SUICIDE CRISIS OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $480,382 · OtherRAPE & SUICIDE CRISIS OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS I…American Red Cross: $291,136 · OtherAmerican Red CrossASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS TEXAS INC: $216,689 · Other+7 more: $128,738 · OtherRICHARD L SHORKEY EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION CENTER: $1,088,383 · HealthRICHARD L S…LEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $123,596 · HealthLEGACY COMM…Communities in Schools Southeast Texas: $487,820 · Community ImprovementGirl Scouts of San Jacinto Council: $428,187 · Youth DevelopmentBRED CORPORATION: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentAnayat House Inc: $63,600 · Housing & ShelterUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $52,695 · Public Benefit
Human Services$5,151,573Other$4,522,483Health$1,211,979Community Improvement$487,820Youth Development$473,187Housing & Shelter$63,600Public Benefit$52,695

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $1,747,275 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetRecovery Council of Southeast Texas: $1,425,574 over 9y, 14% of budgetRICHARD L SHORKEY EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION CENTER: $1,088,383 over 9y, 14% of budgetFAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $980,835 over 9y, 9.5% of budgetCatholic Charities of Southeast Texas: $943,802 over 9y, 9.7% of budgetSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc: $818,778 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - THREE RIVERS COUNCIL: $569,327 over 9y, 12% of budgetCommunities in Schools Southeast Texas: $487,820 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetRAPE & SUICIDE CRISIS OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $480,382 over 9y, 20% of budgetGirl Scouts of San Jacinto Council: $428,187 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS TEXAS INC: $216,689 over 9y, 13% of budgetBoys Haven of America Inc: $193,768 over 6y, 9.3% of budgetSoutheast Texas Family Resource Center Inc: $187,525 over 8y, 10% of budgetSOUTHEAST TEXAS HOSPICE INC: $158,661 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetLEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $123,596 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSamaritan Counseling Center of Southeast Texas: $110,929 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetAnayat House Inc: $63,600 over 7y, 5.4% of budgetCapland Center for Communication Disorders Inc: $56,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $52,695 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Southeast Texas Inc: $36,267 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetICONNECT OUTREACH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEHEMIAH'S VISION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $5,061 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS ↗
  • Who funds Recovery Council of Southeast Texas ↗
  • Who funds RICHARD L SHORKEY EDUCATION AND REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of Southeast Texas ↗
  • Who funds Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - THREE RIVERS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Communities in Schools Southeast Texas ↗
  • Who funds RAPE & SUICIDE CRISIS OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of San Jacinto Council ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys Haven of America Inc ↗
  • Who funds Southeast Texas Family Resource Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST TEXAS HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Samaritan Counseling Center of Southeast Texas ↗
  • Who funds Anayat House Inc ↗
  • Who funds Capland Center for Communication Disorders Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds BRED CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates of Southeast Texas Inc ↗
  • Who funds ICONNECT OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds NEHEMIAH'S VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF JEFFERSON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Mid & South Jefferson CoTX32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Mid & South Jefferson Co · Foundation for Southeast Texas Inc · United Way of Orange County Inc · Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage Foundation · Young Mens Business League of Beaumont · Save The Children Federation Inc · Mechia Foundation · Christus Health · Texas Mutual Insurance Company · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Southeast Texas Emergency Relief Fd · He and Kate Dishman Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Way of Beaumont & North Jefferson County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Way of Beaumont & North Jefferson County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Way of Beaumont & North Jefferson County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph