Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Athens-Limestone County

To strenghten and implement the spirit of human helpfulness in the city of athens and limestone county, alabama, to create a fund to be annually collected cooperativley by voluntary contributions, and to study the health, welfare, and human services of limestone county and by cooperative effort meet those needs through the development of…

$184k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$481kYouth Development$342kHealth$199kEmployment$154kEducation$116kPublic Safety & Disaster$75kRecreation & Sports$19kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 15 grants below total $177,550 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $183,547 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,997 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $142k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$216k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIRDIE THORNTON CENTER (ARC)$19,000
CRISIS SERVICES OF NORTH ALABAMA$17,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER NORTH ALABAMA$16,000
LIMESTONE COUNTY 4-H COUNCIL$16,000
LEARN TO READ COUNCIL$15,500
SALVATION ARMY$14,000
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$12,250
AMERICAN RED CROSS$12,000
LIMESTONE COUNTY COUNSELING CENTER$10,000
MENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA$10,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH ALABAMA$8,400
RETIRED SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM (RSVP)$8,000
FULL TUMMY PROJECT$7,500
GREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$6,400
Individual grant recipient$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $217k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Athens-Limestone Co Assoc for Retarded Citizens: $37k → 10%Athens-Limestone Co Assoc for Retarded Citizens: $35k → 10%Athens-Limestone Co Assoc for Retarded Citizens: $27k → 10%Athens-Limestone Co Assoc for Retarded Citizens: $21k → 10%ATHENS-LIMESTONE CO ASSOC FOR RETARDED CITIZENS: $19k → 10%Athens-Limestone Co Assoc for Retarded Citizens: $15k → 10%American Red Cross-Limestone County Chapter: $12k → 10%American Red Cross-Limestone County Chapter: $12k → 10%American Red Cross-Limestone County Chapter: $11k → 10%American Red Cross-Limestone County Chapter: $11k → 10%American Red Cross-Limestone County Chapter: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS-LIMESTONE COUNTY CHAPTER: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 14 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$1.3M
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+40%

Still filing today

57%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesInternationalReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Crisis Services of North Alabama Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $143k · revenue +22%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $123k · revenue +165%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF LIMESTONE COUNTY
    6× · 2017–2022 · $71k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $34k
  • LC
    Limestone County Churches Involved
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -12%
  • TA
    THE ALABAMA 4-H CLUB FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alabama Association of Resource Conservation and Development Councils

Coordinate rc&d activity in alabama

Environment
2
Caring for Citizens of Alabama

Social services

Human Services
3
Girl Scouts Heart of the South

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
4
Girl Scouts of Southern Alabama

To provide volunteer support & training, and the girl scout leadership program within thirty counties in southern alabama.

5
Alabama Rural Electric Association of Cooperatives

A statewide trade association which serves as a resource through which its electric cooperative members are provided services for the continuation and advancement of the rural electrification program in Alabama.

6
Legal Aid Society of Birmingham

The Organization is a nonprofit community defender providing legal assistance through court appointment to children and other indigent persons.

Crime & Legal
7
Limestone Baptist Association Inc

To promote and maintain cooperation among Southern Baptist Churches of Limestone County.

Religion
8
Travelers Aid Society of Greater Bham Alabama Inc

Provide emergency aid to people who experience crisis situations while away from home. This includes information and referral, situational counseling, protective services and, when appropriate, food and transportation.

9
Autauga Interfaith Care Center Inc

Autauga Interfaith Care Center, Inc. is a cooperative outreach ministry of Christian churches and individuals in Autauga County, Alabama.

Human Services
10
Alabama Regional Medical Services

To provide quality healthcare and related services to all communities, including the underserved and homeless persons, regardless of language, culture, or financial barriers

Health
11
Mobile Area Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

To promote scouting in the south alabama area

Youth Development
12
Boys and Girls of North Central Alabama Inc

Provide recreational activities, athletic programs, various educational and enrichment programs to members and other youth with an emphasis on the under privileged.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Alabama 4-H Club Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Habitat for Humanity International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $178,915 · OtherFAMILY RESOURCE CENTERCrisis Services of North Alabama Inc — $142,757 · OtherCrisis Services of North Alabama IncLearn To Read Council — $116,394 · OtherLearn To Read CouncilMENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA INC — $110,194 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH CENTER OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA INCSalvation Army — $101,000 · OtherSalvation ArmyLimestone County 4-H Council — $90,856 · OtherLimestone County 4-H CouncilHOSPICE OF LIMESTONE COUNTY — $70,906 · OtherHOSPICE OF LIMESTONE COUNTYGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $51,753 · OtherRetired Senior Volunteer Program — $45,999 · Other+11 more — $120,144 · Other+11 moreAthens Limestone County ARC Inc — $216,731 · Human ServicesAthens Limestone …BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA — $122,594 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS C…GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA — $62,125 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF…Limestone County Churches Involved — $10,431 · ReligionHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,033 · International
Other$1,028,918Human Services$216,731Youth Development$184,719Religion$10,431International$1,033

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAthens Limestone County ARC Inc — $216,731 over 6y, 54% of budgetCrisis Services of North Alabama Inc — $142,757 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA — $122,594 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetHOSPICE OF LIMESTONE COUNTY — $70,906 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA — $62,125 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $51,753 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetRetired Senior Volunteer Program — $45,999 over 6y, 11% of budgetLimestone County Churches Involved — $10,431 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetTHE ALABAMA 4-H CLUB FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC — $1,033 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Athens Limestone County ARC Inc
  • Who funds Crisis Services of North Alabama Inc
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTH ALABAMA
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF LIMESTONE COUNTY
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NORTH CENTRAL ALABAMA
  • Who funds GREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds Retired Senior Volunteer Program
  • Who funds Limestone County Churches Involved
  • Who funds THE ALABAMA 4-H CLUB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Publix Super Markets Charities IncFL12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Athens-Limestone County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph