· Public charity
United Way for Clinton County Inc
To help preserve the dignity and self worth of every individual by mobilizing community resources to meet the human service needs of clinton county indiana.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $357,157 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $379,099 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $21,942 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $18k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $264k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IU HEALTH GRANT | $75,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CLINTON CO | $41,500 |
| CAMP CULLOM | $29,750 |
| COACH KIDS | $29,000 |
| OPEN DOOR CLINIC | $20,500 |
| PAUL PHILLIPPE RESOURCE CENTER | $19,750 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $18,750 |
| FOOD FINDERS | $18,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $16,332 |
| WE CARE | $14,500 |
| HEALTHY COMM PEER RECOVERY | $11,500 |
| FRIENDS OF LIBRARY DOLLY PARTON | $11,150 |
| ONE80 | $11,050 |
| FRIENDS OF LIBRARY READING PROGRAM | $11,000 |
| QUINTON'S HOUSE | $10,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $302k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against -27% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF7× · 2017–2024 · $339k · revenue +168%
- CCCLINTON COUNTY FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH7× · 2017–2024 · $218k · revenue +1% · 72% of their budget
- CCCORE Community Center7× · 2017–2024 · $151k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- C1COVID 19 GRANTS AND RELIEFone grant, 2020 · $139k
- C1COVID 19 GRANT ROUND TWOone grant, 2021 · $96k
- C1COVID 19 LILLY GRANT SPENDone grant, 2021 · $73k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
WE WERE ESTABLISHED to provide shelter and rehablitation SERVICES for the homeless. We provide individuals living quarters for up to 90 days. We train them in employment, financial, AND HOUSING MATTERS. WE PROVIDE HOUSEHOLD FURNISHINGS AND…
To help the elderly maintain their health and independence as long as possible.
The organization provides day care services for the elderly
To provide assistance to the elderly and poor
Senior center
Provide crisis intervention, counseling, and shelter; support and empowerment; education, information, and referrals to victims of sexual and domestic violence and to those significant in their lives; and outreach related to the issues of…
The mission of the organization is to prevent and alleviate poverty conditions and their causes among urban rural residents of the organization's service area.
Provide residential care for elderly individuals
Operation of rehab home
Provide programs and nutrition for senior citizens
To provide leadership in our communities to 1) identify our most pressing human care needs, 2) to work together to direct the time, energy and resources towards addressing those needs to improve our quality of life.
Provide services to existing and prospective businesses in clinton county, indiana
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club of and the most unlike its peers is The Way Out Sober Living Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ↗
- Who funds COACH KIDS OF CLINTON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CLINTON COUNTY FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds CORE Community Center ↗
- Who funds OPEN DOOR HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds PAUL PHILLIPPE RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY COMMUNITIES OF CLINTON COUN ↗
- Who funds THE WAY OUT SOBER LIVING HOME INC ↗
- Who funds QUINTON'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Home for the Night ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds One80 Recovery Resources Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Howard County · Lincoln Legacy Foundation Inc · E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable · Sia Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way for Clinton County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.