Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Alabama · Private foundation

E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
13
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$36,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$36,500
Organizations funded a year
12 to 13
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$593k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$37k100%
FY202413$36k0%
FY202313$38k0%
FY202212$38k25%
FY202113$44k0%
FY202012$40k8%
FY201913$37k15%
FY201812$36kn/a
79% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$57kAnimals$55kHuman Services$51kPhilanthropy$37kEducation$12kCrime & Legal$12kYouth Development$10kEmployment$10kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Paul Phillippe Resource Center Inc$40,77671%
United Way of Clinton County$36,5001n/a
Humane Society of Clinton County Inc$23,30952%
Open Door Health Clinic Inc$17,01533%
Wecare of Clinton County$10,62662%
Boys and Girls Club Of$10,44261%
Learning Network of Clinton County$10,35261%
Clinton County Humane Society$9,31324%
The Arc of Clinton County Inc$8,955434%
Quinton's House Inc$5,1043n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($134k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 8 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100kgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPaul Phillippe Resource Center Inc: $40,776 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetHumane Society of Clinton County Inc: $23,309 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetOpen Door Health Clinic Inc: $17,015 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetWecare of Clinton County: $10,626 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetBoys and Girls Club Of: $10,442 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetLearning Network of Clinton County: $10,352 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetClinton County Humane Society: $9,313 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetThe Arc of Clinton County Inc: $8,955 over 4y, 34% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …United Way for Clinto…Lincoln Legacy Founda…Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Howard CountyIN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Howard County · United Way for Clinton County Inc · Lincoln Legacy Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable with peer funders

About E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable

How much does E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable give?
E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable reported 1 grants totaling $36,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 13 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (19%), Animals (18%), Human Services (17%).
Who are E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Paul Phillippe Resource Center Inc ($41k), United Way of Clinton County ($37k), Humane Society of Clinton County Inc ($23k).
Does E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Community Foundation of Howard County, United Way for Clinton County Inc, Lincoln Legacy Foundation Inc.
Where is E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable based?
E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969 Charitable is based in AL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on E Milner Trust Uw (Pre-1969’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home