Skip to content
United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied

Work together to improve jobs, build a better future, promote fairness, justice and equality in the workplace and in society.

$2.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$12MSocial Science$880kCivil Rights$830kPhilanthropy$521kRecreation & Sports$238kHealth$125kEnvironment$106kMembership Benefit$82kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $1,602,427, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,435,323 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $832,896 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $136k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $238k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.2M
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
USW WORKS$1,200,915
ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE$120,000
ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS$68,012
UNITED WAY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY$50,000
USW LOCAL UNION 09004$25,000
STEEL VALLEY AUTHORITY$18,400
A PHILIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND$11,600
LABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT$11,000
CENTER FOR HOPE$10,000
AFL-CIO SECRETARY-TREASURER$10,000
NATIONAL ACTION NETWORK$10,000
INDEPENDENT MEDIA INSTITUTE$10,000
NATIONAL COLLEGE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION (NCPA)$10,000
ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LABOR ALLIANCE AFL-CIO$10,000
JDRF WESTERN PA CHAPTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $154k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AIDS-FREE WORLDTIDES CENTER: $25k → 6%AIDS-FREE WORLDTIDES CENTER: $30k → 17%AIDS-FREE WORLDTIDES CENTER: $25k → 17%AIDS-FREE WORLDTIDES CENTER: $25k → 17%ALLIANCE OF CALIFORNIANS FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 11%HOLY FAMILY FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
WV
VA
MD
DE
TN
DC

Grants abroad, by region: $340k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$340k · 100% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 26 repeat orgs$492k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
27

Total granted

$14M
$449k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+16%

Still filing today

85%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsEmploymentHealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $880k · revenue +261%
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $618k · revenue +4%
  • JT
    JOBS TO MOVE AMERICA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $75k · revenue +650%

Funded once

  • AO
    Alliance of Health Care Unionsgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $127k · revenue +53%
  • CT
    CITIZENS TRADE CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -43%
  • CA
    COLLEGE ATHLETES PLAYERS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Afl-Cio Union Lawyers Alliance

Afl-cio union lawyers alliance was established to better the conditions of working men and women and their families by enhancing the quality of legal representation that is available to the afl-cio and the national and international unions…

—
2
American Federation of Labor Ohio Afl-Cio

To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…

—
3
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 825ABCDRRH

The work of the union, as the representative of its members, is to provide for the continuous employment of labor, to bring about stable conditions in the industry, and to establish necessary procedures for resolutions of disputes between…

—
4
Laborers International Union of 341 Hcl

Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…

—
5
Laborers International Union of North America - Local 1076

The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.

—
6
Cincinnati Afl-Cio Labor Council

The mission of the afl-cio is to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our nation.

—
7
American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Orgs

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
8
Laborers International Union of State of Mi

Collective bargaining and representation

—
9
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union

To organize all workers for the economic, moral, and social advancement of their condition and status.

Employment
10
University of Michigan

To represent and advocate for its member physicians.

—
11
Employ America

To promote macroeconomic policies that ensure the sustained advancement of labor market outcomes for all american workers, i.e. tight labor markets, higher wages and better quality employment.

Employment
12
United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied

Work together to improve jobs, build a better future, promote fairness, justice and equality in the workplace and in society.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Campaign for Americas Future; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/53
Grantees still filing
30/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USW WORKS: $11,318,956 · OtherUSW WORKS+38 more: $876,889 · Other+38 moreECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $880,000 · Social ScienceALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS: $617,589 · Civil RightsLABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT: $42,624 · Civil Rights+3 more: $54,600 · Civil RightsTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $409,545 · PhilanthropyMULTIPLYING GOOD INC: $20,750 · Philanthropy+1 more: $6,000 · PhilanthropyAlliance of Health Care Unions: $126,525 · EmploymentJOBS TO MOVE AMERICA: $75,000 · EmploymentTHE NEWSGUILD-CWA PITTSBURGH STRIKER FUND: $15,000 · EmploymentWORKERS DEFENSE LEAGUE INC: $10,000 · Employment+1 more: $6,000 · EmploymentNATIONAL COLLEGE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION: $125,000 · Recreation & SportsCENTER FOR HOPE: $45,000 · Recreation & SportsTIDES CENTER: $105,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $24,000 · Human ServicesHOLY FAMILY INSTITUTE: $15,000 · Human ServicesAlliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$12,195,845Social Science$880,000Civil Rights$714,813Philanthropy$436,295Employment$232,525Recreation & Sports$170,000Human Services$154,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $880,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS: $617,589 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $409,545 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL COLLEGE PLAYERS ASSOCIATION: $125,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $105,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOBS TO MOVE AMERICA: $75,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $69,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetA PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE: $67,660 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetCITIZENS TRADE CAMPAIGN: $50,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetIndependent Media Institute: $47,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS: $46,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR HOPE: $45,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetLABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT: $42,624 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetTHE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS): $37,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALLEGHENY COUNTY LABOR COUNCIL: $32,400 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetUNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE: $29,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $26,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS: $24,745 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $24,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetA PHILIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND: $21,600 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetJust Harvest-A Center For Action Against Hunger: $20,985 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetMULTIPLYING GOOD INC: $20,750 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEDUCATION FUND OF THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL LABOR SOLIDARITY: $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR AMERICAS FUTURE: $20,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LABOR ALLIANCE AFL -CIO: $17,500 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetHOLY FAMILY INSTITUTE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRIDE AT WORK AFL-CIO: $13,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHCARE-NOW INC: $11,500 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetCOALITION OF KAISER PERMANENTE UNIONS AFL-CIO: $10,965 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY ASSOCIATION OF WESTERN AND CENTRAL PA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORKERS DEFENSE LEAGUE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetAlliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACTION NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMidwest Academy: $8,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHOCKEY STICKS TOGETHER FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR COALITION OF WESTERN NEW YORK INC: $8,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LABOR HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetTHE BATTLE OF HOMESTEAD FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BEAVER COUNTY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJobs with Justice Education Fund: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMYLAN PARK FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communications Worker…International Brother…United Food and Comme…Int Union United Auto…Unite HereAmerican Federation o…International Union o…United Steelworkers I…Office and Profession…National Nurses UnitedAmerican Federation o…Tides Foundation
Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio ClcDC38.3× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio Clc · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · United Food and Commercial Workers International Union · Int Union United Auto National Community Action Program · Unite Here · American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations · International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers · United Steelworkers Intl Group Return · Office and Professional Employees International Union · National Nurses United · American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees · Tides Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home