Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Int Union United Auto National Community Action Program

Meetings, education, communication, community action and donations, non-partisan voter registration, administration of the organization, maintenance of its properties and assets, fraternal and social activities and related activities which further the common interest of the membership.

$90k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of INT UNION UNITED AUTO NATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $70,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $90,200 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,200 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$228k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OTSEGO COUNTY UNITED WAY$30,000
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS$10,000
COALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS$10,000
LABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT (LCLAA)$10,000
PRIDE WORK$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%ONE FAIR WAGE ACTION INC: $75k → 10%JOBS TO MOVE AMERICA: $25k → 14%UNITED FARM WORKERS: $25k → 18%GOOD JOBS FIRST: $25k → 14%HILLSIDE PRODUCTIONS INC: $125k → 8%OTSEGO COUNTY UNITED WAY: $30k → 11%MICHIGAN AFL-CIO: $300k → 16%MICHIGAN FOR ALL: $150k → 21%ONE WISCONSIN NOW: $25k → 10%TN STATE CONFERENCE NAACP: $30k → 15%NC STATE AFL-CIO: $75k → 8%UAW ILLINOIS STATE CAP COUNCIL: $100k → 8%HOME MEANS NEVADA PAC: $50k → 13%COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $25k → 14%UNITED FARM WORKERS: $25k → 18%ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE: $25k → 17%HILLSIDE PRODUCTIONS INC: $125k → 8%ONE WISCONSIN NOW: $25k → 10%TN STATE CONFERENCE NAACP: $30k → 15%NC STATE AFL-CIO: $25k → 8%THE EMG FOUNDATION: $30k → 8%ROB MURPHY FOUNDATION: $25k → 21%THE GOOD LAND COMMITTEE INC: $500k → 10%DETROIT BRANCH NAACP: $150k → 21%DETROIT BRANCH NAACP: $150k → 21%DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION: $2.0M → 14%DETROIT BRANCH NAACP: $150k → 21%DEMOCRACY INITIATIVE: $150k → 14%DPGL LLC: $75k → 21%ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $100k → 14%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY: $72k → 21%NATIONAL ACTION NETWORK: $50k → 17%ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $100k → 14%DEMOS: $35k → 17%ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $100k → 14%DETROIT BRANCH NAACP: $50k → 21%DEMOCRACY INITIATIVE: $100k → 14%ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE: $98k → 14%NATIONAL NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS ASSC: $35k → 14%TRANSAFRICA FORUM: $25k → 14%DEMOCRACY INITIATIVE: $75k → 14%BUILDING BACK TOGETHER: $50k → 14%ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS: $35k → 14%LABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN: $30k → 14%DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEY'S GENERAL: $100k → 14%DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEY'S GENERAL: $50k → 14%DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEY'S GENERAL: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
MS
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 26 repeat orgs$4.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

26 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 23 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
61

Total granted

$2.1M
$4.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+8%

Still filing today

81%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Civil RightsPublic BenefitEducationEmploymentCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EP
    ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE
    4× · 2018–2022 · $398k · revenue +49%
  • NS
    NC STATE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORG
    2× · 2020–2022 · $100k · revenue +77%
  • UF
    UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA
    4× · 2018–2022 · $60k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • DG
    DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2022 · $2.0M
  • TG
    The Good Land Committee Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $500k
  • MA
    MICHIGAN AFL-CIO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $300k · revenue -96%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Washington State Labor Council Afl-Cio

To protect and strengthen the rights and conditions of working people and their families.

—
2
Laborers International Union of State of Mi

Collective bargaining and representation

—
3
American Federation of Labor Ohio Afl-Cio

To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…

—
4
Laborers International Union of 341 Hcl

Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…

—
5
American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Orgs

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
6
Cincinnati Afl-Cio Labor Council

The mission of the afl-cio is to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our nation.

—
7
Afl-Cio Union Lawyers Alliance

Afl-cio union lawyers alliance was established to better the conditions of working men and women and their families by enhancing the quality of legal representation that is available to the afl-cio and the national and international unions…

—
8
Laborers International Union of North America - Local 1076

The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.

—
9
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 825ABCDRRH

The work of the union, as the representative of its members, is to provide for the continuous employment of labor, to bring about stable conditions in the industry, and to establish necessary procedures for resolutions of disputes between…

—
10
Laborers' International Union of North America

To improve working conditions and living standards of members through collective bargaining, education, training, and employee benefits.

—
11
University of Michigan

To represent and advocate for its member physicians.

—
12
LaborLab

LaborLab is a nonprofit watchdog dedicated to safeguarding workers rights to organize, win strong contracts, and build lasting collective power. Through strategic research, educational resources, and corporate accountability, we empower…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farmworker Justice Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ottawa Friendship House Work Activity Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUnited Way AffiliatesLgbtq+ Community SupportSchool District FoundationsMilitary Veterans SupportFaith-Based Social ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Immigrant Worker SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Women & Girls Leadership De…Youth Development ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%6%<5yr14%6%5–10yr18%17%10–20yr18%18%20–35yr16%30%35–55yr15%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%8%<5yr14%17%5–10yr18%11%10–20yr18%10%20–35yr16%37%35–55yr15%18%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/92
the rest of the field
12%
1,600/12,909

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
69/73
Grantees still filing
42/73
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION — $2,000,000 · OtherDEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATIONThe Good Land Committee Inc — $500,000 · OtherThe Good Land Committee IncDETROIT BRANCH NAACP — $450,000 · OtherDETROIT BRANCH NAACPDEMOCRACY INITIATIVE — $325,000 · OtherDEMOCRACY INITIATIVEDEMOCRATIC ATTORNEYS GENERAL ASSOCIATION — $200,000 · Other+52 more — $1,682,500 · Other+52 moreECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE — $397,500 · Social ScienceMICHIGAN AFL-CIO FOUNDATION — $300,000 · EmploymentJEWISH LABOR COMMITTEE — $35,000 · EmploymentJOBS TO MOVE AMERICA — $25,000 · Employment+3 more — $17,500 · EmploymentLABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT — $60,400 · Civil RightsPRIDE AT WORK AFL-CIO — $40,000 · Civil RightsCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · Civil RightsUnited States Hispanic Leadership Institute Inc — $26,000 · Civil RightsFair Elections Center — $25,000 · Civil RightsEQUALITY MICHIGAN — $15,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $10,000 · Civil RightsCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS POLITICAL EDU CATION AND LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE — $10,000 · Civil Rights+2 more — $10,000 · Civil RightsWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $72,012 · EducationTHE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE — $40,000 · EducationGOOD JOBS FIRST — $25,000 · EducationJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $24,000 · EducationPEGGY BROWNING FUND — $20,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $10,000 · Education+1 more — $5,000 · EducationNATIONAL ACTION NETWORK INC — $50,000 · Public BenefitDEMOS A NETWORK FOR IDEAS AND ACTION LTD — $40,000 · Public BenefitINSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY — $27,500 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE ACTION — $25,000 · Public BenefitCONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS CENTER — $10,000 · Public Benefit+3 more — $15,000 · Public BenefitHome Means Nevada Inc HMN — $50,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$5,157,500Social Science$397,500Employment$377,500Civil Rights$226,400Education$196,012Public Benefit$167,500Housing & Shelter$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Good Land Committee Inc — $500,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE — $397,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetDEMOCRACY INITIATIVE — $325,000 over 3y, 83% of budgetNC STATE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORG — $100,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetONE FAIR WAGE ACTION INC — $75,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $72,012 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLABOR COUNCIL FOR LATIN AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT — $60,400 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetUNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA — $60,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBBT INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL ACTION NETWORK INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetONE WISCONSIN NOW INC — $50,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetHome Means Nevada Inc HMN — $50,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetCOALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS — $45,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetTHE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE — $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDEMOS A NETWORK FOR IDEAS AND ACTION LTD — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPRIDE AT WORK AFL-CIO — $40,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetJEWISH LABOR COMMITTEE — $35,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetNATIONAL NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOTSEGO COUNTY UNITED WAY INC — $30,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY — $27,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $26,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUnited States Hispanic Leadership Institute Inc — $26,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE ACTION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROB MURPHY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 63% of budgetJOBS TO MOVE AMERICA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFair Elections Center — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGOOD JOBS FIRST — $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $24,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetPEGGY BROWNING FUND — $20,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBING YOUTH INSTITUTE — $20,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetSIXTEEN THIRTY FUND — $19,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNION SPORTSMEN'S ALLIANCE — $17,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC — $17,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LABOR ALLIANCE AFL -CIO — $15,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUALITY MICHIGAN — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMICHIGAN MINORITY PURCHASING COUNCIL D/B/A MMSDC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCITIZENS TRADE CAMPAIGN — $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LABOR RIGHTS FORUM — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNION VETERANS COUNCIL — $10,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF DETROIT AND SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOALITION OF LABOR UNION WOMEN — $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communications Worker…American Federation o…American Federation o…United Food and Comme…International Brother…Unite HereNational Education As…International Brother…United Steel Paper an…International Union o…National Nurses UnitedInternational Union o…
Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio ClcDC56.6× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio Clc · American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees · American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations · United Food and Commercial Workers International Union · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · Unite Here · National Education Association of the United States · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied · International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers · National Nurses United · International Union of Painters and Allied Trades

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Int Union United Auto National Community Action Program funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Int Union United Auto National Community Action Program?

    Find your warmest path to Int Union United Auto National Community Action Program through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $1.7M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines