· Public charity
United States Telecom Association
See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable amount of resources and investment to deliver high-speed broadband to u.s.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $168,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $221,638 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $53,638 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $160k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION | $30,000 |
| LGBT TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE | $20,000 |
| TECHNOLOGY POLICY INSTITUTE | $15,000 |
| MULTICULTURAL MEDIA TELECOM & INTERNET COUNCIL | $15,000 |
| DIGITAL PROGRESS INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| FCBA | $10,000 |
| MARCH OF DIMES INC | $10,000 |
| ALLVANZA | $10,000 |
| BREAKTHROUGH T1D MID-ATLANTIC CHAPTER | $10,000 |
| HORTON'S KID'S | $10,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LAW & ECONOMICS | $10,000 |
| R STREET INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER WASHINGTON DC | $8,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MMMulticultural Media Telecom & Internet Council6× · 2018–2024 · $130k · revenue +1%
- LTLGBT TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE6× · 2019–2024 · $95k · revenue +351%
- HKHORTON'S KIDS INC7× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +66%
Funded once
- FAFAITH AND POLITICS INSTITUTEgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +41%
- NUNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INCone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -65%
- ACATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +62%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Techcongress gives talented technologists the opportunity to gain first-hand experience in federal policymaking and shape the future of tech policy through fellowships with members of congress and congressional committees.
The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…
To research and develop centrist policy ideas.
Third way institute supports charitable and educational activities that advance centrist solutions to major economic, national security, energy and social policy issues.
To develop cross-community knowledge and dialogue on how people, technology and innovation contribute to sustainable and inclusive growth; to inform policy-makers, by producing independent, rigorous metrics and data-based research; to…
The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.
The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…
To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…
Poptech's mission is to accelerate the positive impact of world-changing people, projects and ideas. founded in 1996 by bob metcalfe (inventor, ethernet) and john sculley (apple, pepsi), poptech originally provided a forum to critically…
Issue one is the leading crosspartisan political reform organization that educates the public, engages capitol hill, and advocates for solutions to fix our broken political system.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Free State Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Technology Policy Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Multicultural Media Telecom & Internet Council ↗
- Who funds The Third Way Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds LGBT TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds HORTON'S KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX CENTER FOR ADVANCED LEGAL & ECONOMIC PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds Prevent Cancer Foundation aka Cancer Research & Prevention Fndn ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES ↗
- Who funds TECHNOLOGY POLICY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL WOMENS INNOVATION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds R STREET INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds NEWDEAL ↗
- Who funds TASTE OF THE SOUTH ↗
- Who funds MERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds Information Technology and Innovation Foundation ↗
- Who funds ALLvanza ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FAITH AND POLITICS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FIRST TEE OF GREATER WASHINGTON DC LANGSTON GOLF COURSE ↗
- Who funds FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS BAR ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MANA A NATIONAL LATINA ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC ↗
- Who funds THE FREE STATE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL POLICY NETWORK US INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds No Greater Sacrifice Foundation ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL REPUBLICAN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS BAR ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Digital Progress Institute ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ncta - the Internet & Television Association · Motion Picture Association Inc · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Consumer Technology Association · Ctia - the Wireless Association · Mywirelessorg · The Seminar Network Inc · The Bgr Foundation Inc · Charles Koch Institute · The Business Roundtable Inc · Bsa Business Software Alliance Inc · Association for Accessible Medicines
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United States Telecom Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.