· Public charity
The United Neighborhood Houses of New York Inc
Unh promotes and strengthens the neighborhood based, multi-service approach to improving the lives of new yorkers in need and the communities in which they live.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 35 grants below total $3,952,934 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,076,435 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $123,501 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k9 grants · $261k
- $50k–250k25 grants · $3.4M
- $250k+1 grant · $295k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAMBA | $294,750 |
| ARAB-AMERICAN FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER | $245,486 |
| QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE | $233,800 |
| SUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES | $212,000 |
| PROJECT HOSPITALITY | $209,550 |
| HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT | $200,211 |
| RED HOOK INITIATIVE | $198,788 |
| SAINT NICK'S ALLIANCE | $175,111 |
| BRONXWORKS | $169,300 |
| WHEDCO | $158,050 |
| EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE | $156,040 |
| JACOB A RIIS NEIGHBORHOOD SETTLEMENT | $145,850 |
| NORTHERN MANHATTAN IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION | $144,000 |
| CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE | $137,850 |
| GODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER | $126,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
37 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $138k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- QCQUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE7× · 2017–2024 · $787k · revenue +132%
- PHPROJECT HOSPITALITY INC5× · 2019–2024 · $675k · revenue +46%
- CICAMBA INC4× · 2020–2024 · $651k · revenue +26%
Funded once
- SMSTANLEY M ISAACS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $63k · revenue +57%
- UCUNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $28k · revenue +78%
- HHHARTLEY HOUSE INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $16k · revenue +220%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.
To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.
Bcs partners with people to overcome obstacles on their pathway toward self-determination (see schedule o).
The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.
To provide short term, transitional and permanent housing, homelessness prevention, personalized case management, mental health care, on-site nursing, vocational training, substance abuse counseling, recreational activities and other vital…
The organization strives to protect, empower and promote independence for at-risk children and families and those with developmental disabilities through quality community based services.
To provide a comprehensive range of social services to individuals and technical assistance to nonprofit organizations across nyc.
Catholic charities neighborhood services, inc. (ccns) is a not-for-profit corporation that provides a variety of social services throughout the boroughs of brooklyn and queens. ccns currently offers 160-plus programs and services for…
Northside center for child development day school (the "school") operates a comprehensive treatment center dedicated to meeting the social, emotional and educational needs of children and their families, principally through the operation…
Forestdale's mission is to ensure that children have the assets they need to thrive.
Commonpoint is a community-centric nonprofit, serving diverse audiences though every chapter of life, across the five boroughs of new york city and beyond. they offer a rich range of services through their vast network of professionals,…
To assist societys most disenfranchised; the elderly, seriously mentally ill adults, the homeless, people living with AIDS and the physically challenged by promoting, fostering and providing the highest quality of housing and services in a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverdale Neighborhood House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ocean Bay Community Development Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 50 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOSPITALITY INC ↗
- Who funds CAMBA INC ↗
- Who funds SUNNYSIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARAB-AMERICAN FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RED HOOK INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds ST NICKS ALLIANCE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BRONXWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds JACOB A RIIS NEIGHBORHOOD SETTLEMENT ↗
- Who funds SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds THE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds SCAN-HARBOR INC ↗
- Who funds HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN MANHATTAN IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MOSHOLU MONTEFIORE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN BAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds CYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds KINGSBRIDGE HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CRENULATED COMPANY LTD ↗
- Who funds GODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds EAST SIDE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SHOREFRONT YM-YWHA OF BRIGHTON- MANHATTAN BEACH INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR FAMILY LIFE IN SUNSET PARK INC ↗
- Who funds HUDSON GUILDINC ↗
- Who funds UNION SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds LENOX HILL NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HAMILTON-MADISON HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERDALE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BRONX HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds STANLEY M ISAACS NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BROADWAY HOUSING COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST BRONX NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · United Way of New York City · Research Foundation of the City University of New York · Food Bank for New York City · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Expanded Schools Inc · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · The Fan Fox and Leslie R Samuels Foundation Inc · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The United Neighborhood Houses of New York Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.