Skip to content
United Movement Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

United Movement Inc

To facilitate co-operations, provide aid and advice to organizations, charities, groups and individuals who are dedicated to social justice and the protection of human rights

$76M
Granted FY2022
33
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$335k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2022.

Human Services$1.5MReligion$666kFood & Nutrition$634kInternational$335kCrime & Legal$304kHousing & Shelter$75kYouth Development$44kRecreation & Sports$8kOther$0
02FY2022 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 33 grants below total $1,915,094, the rows itemized in this filing. The $76,066,783 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $74,151,689 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k4 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $345k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+1 grant · $335k
$32,085
Median grant
5
States reached
$239M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOOD 360$335,007
MINISTERIOS BETESDA$143,700
MONTE SION CENTER$140,250
UNIDOS POR LA MUSICA CA$113,450
UNIDOS POR LA MUSICA NV$110,043
BACK TO BASIC$109,100
SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN HOMES$99,300
DRUG AND CRIME FREE$96,350
PHOENIX ASHES$74,500
CHAPEL OF INPROVEMENT FELLOWSHIP$72,500
IGLESIA MISIONERA JESUSCRISTO ES DIOS$69,950
NBC OUTREACH$67,150
COVANENT OF LOVE$57,040
IGLESIA PENTECOSTAL MISINERA IMPACTO$51,050
HOPE 4 EVERYONE FOUNDATION$43,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $904k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNITED CROSS BORDER FOUNDATION: $22k → 10%UNIDOS POR LA MUSICA CA: $132k → 14%CITY SERVE DISTRIBUTION: $9k → 18%UNIDOS POR LA MUSICA CA: $113k → 14%SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN HOMES: $99k → 11%POR AMOR A LA HUMANIDAD: $15k → 14%SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN HOMES: $99k → 11%RESCUE FOR SINGLES MOMS: $12k → 13%UNIDOS POR LA MUSICA NV: $162k → 13%UNIDOS POR LA MUSICA NV: $110k → 13%WORLD HARVEST: $20k → 14%ERC SUPPORT SERVICES: $20k → 13%WOMEN OF STRENGTH NV: $58k → 13%WOMEN OF STRENGTH NV: $32k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 16 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$2.4M
$501k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+126%
+395%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $705k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22
Human ServicesReligionFood & NutritionCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UP
    UNIDOS POR LA MUSICA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $517k · revenue +126% · 46% of their budget
  • MS
    Monte Sion Center
    4× · 2021–2024 · $254k · revenue +147%
  • SA
    SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $199k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • G3
    GOOD 360
    one grant, 2021 · $433k
  • TM
    THE MAXIMUM POTENTIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $44k
  • DH
    Debourahs Housegraduated
    2× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +395%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ministerio Cristiano Josue

Helping people in need with their everyday essentials

Human Services
2
Eben-Ezer Ministries Corp
Religion
3
Victory Life Church International

Church, religious

Religion
4
Joshuas Mission of Hope Inc

Giving hope to disadvantaged children

Education
5
Community for Christ Outreach

Religious Orginazation

Housing & Shelter
6
Were Better Than Blessed

We provide clothes for low income individuals, household items and shelter to battered women and provide the homeless in our community with shelter and food

Human Services
7
Consolation Community Outreach

Consoation Commnity Outreach main purpose is to feed low income and poor families, we also provide them with daily needed essentials for free.

Human Services
8
Messengers of Hope Mission Inc

mobile food pantry

Food & Nutrition
9
Seven Stars Christian Church

Mission Church

Religion
10
Ministerio De Cristo Salvando Al Mundo Inc
Religion
11
Donum Christi Servidores Del Servid Comunidad Apostolica Hijos De Padre

Food for homeless & miscellaneous

Human Services
12
Cathedral of the Blessed Sacrament Society of St Vincent De Paul

To feed and clothe the needy

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Key Nonprofit; the most unlike its peers is Sustainable Logistics CityServe Distribution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/42
Grantees still filing
24/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOOD 360: $433,040 · OtherGOOD 360BACK TO BASIC: $187,975 · OtherBACK TO BASICDRUG & CRIME FREE YOUTH FOUNDATION: $164,710 · OtherDRUG & CRIME FREE YOUTH FOUNDATIONNBC OUTREACH: $157,195 · OtherNBC OUTREACHCHAPEL OF IMPROVEMENT FELLOWSHIP: $153,900 · OtherCHAPEL OF IMPROVEMENT FELLOWSHIPMINISTERIOS BETESDA: $153,800 · OtherMINISTERIOS BETESDAIGLESIA IMPACTO DE DIOS: $92,245 · OtherIGLESIA IMPACTO DE DIOSPHOENIX ASHES INC: $74,500 · OtherIGLESIA MISIONERA JESUCRISTO ES DIOS: $69,950 · OtherARIZONA ZOROASTRIAN ASSOCIATION: $68,850 · Other+9 more: $169,785 · Other+9 moreUNIDOS POR LA MUSICA: $517,368 · Human ServicesUNIDOS POR LA MUSICASUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $198,750 · Human ServicesSUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HO…WOMEN OF STRENGTH: $89,880 · Human ServicesWOMEN OF STRENGTH+6 more: $98,349 · Human Services+6 moreMonte Sion Center: $254,210 · ReligionMonte Sion …IGLESIA PENTESCOTAL MISIONERA IMPACTO DE DIOS: $63,400 · ReligionIGLESIA PEN…Iglesia Manantial De Misericordia: $38,065 · ReligionIglesia Man…+1 more: $10,500 · ReligionGOOD360: $335,007 · InternationalGOOD360COVENANT OF LOVE UUL CORP: $139,665 · Crime & LegalHope 4 Everyone Foundation: $43,900 · Food & NutritionDebourahs House: $10,400 · Food & NutritionEVERLASTING LIFE 7 DAY FITNESS ACADEMY TX: $41,900 · Youth Development
Other$1,725,950Human Services$904,347Religion$366,175International$335,007Crime & Legal$139,665Food & Nutrition$54,300Youth Development$41,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIDOS POR LA MUSICA: $517,368 over 4y, 46% of budgetGOOD360: $335,007 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMonte Sion Center: $254,210 over 4y, 18% of budgetSUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $198,750 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCOVENANT OF LOVE UUL CORP: $139,665 over 4y, 33% of budgetHope 4 Everyone Foundation: $43,900 over 3y, 22% of budgetEVERLASTING LIFE 7 DAY FITNESS ACADEMY TX: $41,900 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetIglesia Manantial De Misericordia: $38,065 over 4y, 52% of budgetUNITED ACROSS BORDERS FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetESSENTIAL RESOURCE CONSULTANTS: $20,400 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetWORLD HARVEST CHARITIES AND FAMILY SERVICES: $20,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPor Amor a la Humanidad: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRESCUE FOR SINGLE MOMS: $11,929 over 3y, 23% of budgetSustainable Logistics CityServe Distribution: $9,020 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOODEN CENTER: $5,700 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNewman Kahlon Foundation Corp: $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIDOS POR LA MUSICA ↗
  • Who funds GOOD360 ↗
  • Who funds Monte Sion Center ↗
  • Who funds SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds DRUG & CRIME FREE YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT OF LOVE UUL CORP ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN OF STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds IGLESIA MISIONERA JESUCRISTO ES DIOS ↗
  • Who funds Hope 4 Everyone Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EVERLASTING LIFE 7 DAY FITNESS ACADEMY TX ↗
  • Who funds Iglesia Manantial De Misericordia ↗
  • Who funds UNITED ACROSS BORDERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ESSENTIAL RESOURCE CONSULTANTS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD HARVEST CHARITIES AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds EL MONTE WESLEYAN CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds Por Amor a la Humanidad ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE FOR SINGLE MOMS ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESE OF CALIFORNIA AMERICAN CATHOLIC CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds Debourahs House ↗
  • Who funds Sustainable Logistics CityServe Distribution ↗
  • Who funds THE GOODEN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Newman Kahlon Foundation Corp ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Good360Feed the Children IncGiving Children HopeFarmlink ProjectHarvest Time Internat…Food Finders IncThe Albertsons Compan…Food Forward IncChildren's Hunger FundBaby2babyCharities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…
Good360VA61.3× affinity50 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Good360 · Feed the Children Inc · Giving Children Hope · Farmlink Project · Harvest Time International Inc · Food Finders Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Food Forward Inc · Children's Hunger Fund · Baby2baby · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization United Movement Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from United Movement Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $143M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on United Movement’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home