· Public charity
United Movement Inc
To facilitate co-operations, provide aid and advice to organizations, charities, groups and individuals who are dedicated to social justice and the protection of human rights
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 33 grants below total $1,915,094 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $76,066,783 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $74,151,689 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k4 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $345k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+1 grant · $335k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GOOD 360 | $335,007 |
| MINISTERIOS BETESDA | $143,700 |
| MONTE SION CENTER | $140,250 |
| UNIDOS POR LA MUSICA CA | $113,450 |
| UNIDOS POR LA MUSICA NV | $110,043 |
| BACK TO BASIC | $109,100 |
| SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN HOMES | $99,300 |
| DRUG AND CRIME FREE | $96,350 |
| PHOENIX ASHES | $74,500 |
| CHAPEL OF INPROVEMENT FELLOWSHIP | $72,500 |
| IGLESIA MISIONERA JESUSCRISTO ES DIOS | $69,950 |
| NBC OUTREACH | $67,150 |
| COVANENT OF LOVE | $57,040 |
| IGLESIA PENTECOSTAL MISINERA IMPACTO | $51,050 |
| HOPE 4 EVERYONE FOUNDATION | $43,900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $904k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2022, 0 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $705k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UPUNIDOS POR LA MUSICA4× · 2021–2024 · $517k · revenue +126% · 46% of their budget
- MSMonte Sion Center4× · 2021–2024 · $254k · revenue +147%
- SASUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC4× · 2021–2024 · $199k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- G3GOOD 360one grant, 2021 · $433k
- TMTHE MAXIMUM POTENTIAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $44k
- DHDebourahs Housegraduated2× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +395%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Helping people in need with their everyday essentials
Church, religious
Giving hope to disadvantaged children
Religious Orginazation
We provide clothes for low income individuals, household items and shelter to battered women and provide the homeless in our community with shelter and food
Consoation Commnity Outreach main purpose is to feed low income and poor families, we also provide them with daily needed essentials for free.
mobile food pantry
Mission Church
Food for homeless & miscellaneous
To feed and clothe the needy
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Key Nonprofit and the most unlike its peers is Sustainable Logistics CityServe Distribution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 9 years old; the field is 12. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 22% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIDOS POR LA MUSICA ↗
- Who funds GOOD360 ↗
- Who funds Monte Sion Center ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE ACRES CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds DRUG & CRIME FREE YOUTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COVENANT OF LOVE UUL CORP ↗
- Who funds WOMEN OF STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds IGLESIA MISIONERA JESUCRISTO ES DIOS ↗
- Who funds Hope 4 Everyone Foundation ↗
- Who funds EVERLASTING LIFE 7 DAY FITNESS ACADEMY TX ↗
- Who funds Iglesia Manantial De Misericordia ↗
- Who funds UNITED ACROSS BORDERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ESSENTIAL RESOURCE CONSULTANTS ↗
- Who funds WORLD HARVEST CHARITIES AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds EL MONTE WESLEYAN CHURCH ↗
- Who funds Por Amor a la Humanidad ↗
- Who funds RESCUE FOR SINGLE MOMS ↗
- Who funds DIOCESE OF CALIFORNIA AMERICAN CATHOLIC CHURCH ↗
- Who funds Debourahs House ↗
- Who funds Sustainable Logistics CityServe Distribution ↗
- Who funds THE GOODEN CENTER ↗
- Who funds Newman Kahlon Foundation Corp ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Good360 · Feed the Children Inc · Giving Children Hope · Farmlink Project · Harvest Time International Inc · Food Finders Inc · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Food Forward Inc · Children's Hunger Fund · Baby2baby · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Movement Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.