· Public charity
United Community Action Partnership Inc
The mission of united community action partnership, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $915,853 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,161,782 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,245,929 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k3 grants · $73k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $271k
- $250k+1 grant · $572k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PRAIRIE FIVE COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC | $572,256 |
| SOUTHWEST CRISIS CENTER | $88,369 |
| WOMEN'S RURAL ADVOCACY PROGRAM INC | $78,326 |
| LAKES & PRAIRIES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP | $53,486 |
| WEST CENTRAL MINNESOTA COMMUNITIES ACTION INC | $50,899 |
| MAHUBE-OTWA COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC | $44,487 |
| MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS ADULT BASIC EDUCATION | $17,370 |
| WRIGHT COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION INC | $10,660 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $645k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PFPrairie Five Community Action Council Inc8× · 2018–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +35%
- LALAKES AND PRAIRIES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC8× · 2018–2025 · $429k · revenue +104%
- MCMAHUBE-OTWA COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC8× · 2018–2025 · $386k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- SASALVATION ARMYone grant, 2018 · $17k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
In partnership with state and federal government, our mission is to administer programs designed to help residents in our 10-county region of southwest iowa achieve self-sufficiency.
Our mission is to stimulate a focusing of all available resources upon the goal of enabling area low-income families and individuals of all ages to attain skills, knowledge, and motivations, and secure the opportunities needed for them to…
The organization is dedicated to alleviating the conditions and causes of poverty by building partnerships and strengthening people through quality services. community action of southeast iowa administers programs funded or supported by…
To assist individuals and families in our communities through public and private partnerships to improve the quality of their lives by minimizing the effects of poverty, promoting self-sufficiency and advocating for social change.
The mission of NCCAP is to act as an advocate, provider, and facilitator of programs and services for low-income individuals in Lincoln, Marathon, and Wood Counties (WI). NCCAP seeks to create opportunities for people and communities to…
The mission of west central wisconsin community action agency, inc. is to take action against poverty by developing the social and economic assets of low-income families and their communities and by working to create a more just and…
West central helps people and communities reach their fullest potential by cultivating and coordinating resources, building partnerships, and advocating for change.
To alleviate the causes and conditions of poverty in Wasco, Hood River, and Sherman Counties. The purpose of MCCAC shall be the promotion of self sufficiency in families and individuals within the low income economic ranges in the three…
Community action partnership provides a range of services, which enable, educate, and assist with self sufficiency, to individuals and communites in western north dakota.
We work to mitigate the causes and conditions of poverty in southwestern wisconsin, building resilience and self-sufficiency by providing supportive services and programs, and by collaborating with partners.
To engage the entire community to listen to and partner with low-income individuals and families to expand their opportunities to move out of economic poverty and toward prosperity.
Our mission is to enhance the quality of life of children who have experienced abuse or neglect, strengthen families and prevent childhood maltreatment, by providing timely crucial support that meets the basic needs of local families and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wright County Community Action Inc and the most unlike its peers is Womens Rural Advocacy Programs. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Prairie Five Community Action Council Inc ↗
- Who funds LAKES AND PRAIRIES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds MAHUBE-OTWA COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds WOMENS RURAL ADVOCACY PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds WEST CENTRAL MINNESOTA COMMUNITIES ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds Southwestern MN Opportunity Council ↗
- Who funds WRIGHT COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Initiative Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Community Action Partnership Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.