Skip to content
Underground Network Incorporated at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Underground Network Incorporated

Underground network, inc.

$182k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$139kReligion$62kHuman Services$60kInternational$45kCommunity Improvement$42kHousing & Shelter$38kArts & Culture$26kCrime & Legal$22kOther$0
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $83,458, the rows itemized in this filing. The $182,326 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $98,868 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$49,804
Median grant
1
States reached
$527k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Underground Clinic Inc$49,804
Revive & Restore Inc$33,654
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Revive & Restore Inc: $34k → 11%Revive & Restore Inc: $6k → 11%Created Women Inc: $8k → 13%Created Women Inc: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $39k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$39k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$329k · 7 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +289% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$329k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+289%
+4%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23
ReligionHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UNDERGROUND CLINIC INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $139k · revenue +27% · 81% of their budget
  • IC
    InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $62k · revenue +9%
  • WI
    Well Incorporated
    3× · 2017–2019 · $38k · revenue +901%

Funded once

  • AO
    ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $45k · revenue +4%
  • SP
    ST PETE UNDERGROUND NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2021 · $42k · 52% of their budget
  • VL
    Vocreo LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $26k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Untrafficked Inc
Human Services
2
Islands of Hope Dream Center

Islands of Hope Dream Center exists to restore hope and dignity to women who have survived human trafficking and sexual exploitation. Our mission is to provide a safe, Christ-centered home where each woman is welcomed into a community,…

Public Benefit
3
Bridging Initiatives International

Provide holistic and integrated service that address the diverse needs of vulnerable individuals and families experiencing instability as the result of domestic violence and /or homelessness.

Human Services
4
Meet Me At the Well Foundation

The organization is focused on working with community partners to establish a residential program in delaware with a dedicated and accredited trauma- informed support staff through partnerships with counseling centers, law enforcement, and…

Health
5
Philippians 3 13 Ministries

Transitional living for recovered addicts.

Health
6
Elijah Rising

Elijah Rising's mission is to end sex trafficking through prayer, awareness, intervention, and restoration.

Human Services
7
F R E E International Inc

To Find Restore Embrace Empower victims of human trafficking. Creating innovative collaborative engagement through multi-sector partnerships targeting vulnerable neighborhoods in cities across the United States.

Human Services
8
Into the Jordan Ministries Inc

Into the jordan ministries exists to bring the hope of jesus christ to trafficked and exloited women in southwest florida.

Religion
9
Jesus House Restoration Ministries

provide a Christian rehabilitation program

Health
10
Christian Recovery Center

Providing hope, healing & freedom from the experience of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse

Religion
11
Remnant Ministries Inc

Restore inmates and those addicted back in to society

Religion
12
Hope Preserved Ministries

Christian ministry to people suffering from sexual, emotional, and religious abuse, mental problems and disorders, trauma, neglect, marital struggles, etc. We work with aspects of dissociation at the root of trauma and childhood issues,…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Created Women Inc; the most unlike its peers is Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $61,913 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUS…ST PETE UNDERGROUND NETWORK INC: $41,687 · ReligionST PETE UNDERGROUND NETWORK INCWell Incorporated: $38,079 · ReligionWell IncorporatedUNDERGROUND CLINIC INC: $139,261 · HealthUNDERGROUND CLINIC INCRevive and Restore Inc: $40,093 · Human ServicesRevive and Rest…CREATED WOMEN INC: $13,600 · Human ServicesCREATED WOMEN I…TIMOTHY INITIATIVE MINISTRIES INC: $6,560 · Human ServicesTIMOTHY INITIAT…ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $45,149 · InternationalALLEGRO ORG…Vocreo LLC: $25,737 · OtherVocreo LLCMAMA AFRICANA NETWORK: $14,020 · OtherMAMA AFRIC…WEST FLORIDA CENTER FOR TRAFFICKING ADVOCACY INC: $21,994 · Crime & Legal
Religion$141,679Health$139,261Human Services$60,253International$45,149Other$39,757Crime & Legal$21,994

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNDERGROUND CLINIC INC: $139,261 over 2y, 81% of budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $61,913 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC: $45,149 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST PETE UNDERGROUND NETWORK INC: $41,687 over 1y, 52% of budgetRevive and Restore Inc: $40,093 over 2y, 61% of budgetWell Incorporated: $38,079 over 3y, 11% of budgetWEST FLORIDA CENTER FOR TRAFFICKING ADVOCACY INC: $21,994 over 3y, 10% of budgetCREATED WOMEN INC: $13,600 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetTIMOTHY INITIATIVE MINISTRIES INC: $6,560 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Natl Christian Charit…Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Underground Network Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Underground Network Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Timothy Initiative Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Well Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Underground Network Incorporated?

Find your warmest path to Underground Network Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $98k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Underground Network’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home