· Public charity
Underground Network Incorporated
Underground network, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $83,458 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $182,326 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $98,868 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Underground Clinic Inc | $49,804 |
| Revive & Restore Inc | $33,654 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $39k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +289% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UCUNDERGROUND CLINIC INC2× · 2021–2023 · $139k · revenue +27% · 81% of their budget
- ICInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA3× · 2017–2019 · $62k · revenue +9%
- WIWell Incorporated3× · 2017–2019 · $38k · revenue +901%
Funded once
- AOALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INCone grant, 2022 · $45k · revenue +4%
- SPST PETE UNDERGROUND NETWORK INCone grant, 2021 · $42k · 52% of their budget
- VLVocreo LLCone grant, 2022 · $26k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Islands of Hope Dream Center exists to restore hope and dignity to women who have survived human trafficking and sexual exploitation. Our mission is to provide a safe, Christ-centered home where each woman is welcomed into a community,…
Provide holistic and integrated service that address the diverse needs of vulnerable individuals and families experiencing instability as the result of domestic violence and /or homelessness.
The organization is focused on working with community partners to establish a residential program in delaware with a dedicated and accredited trauma- informed support staff through partnerships with counseling centers, law enforcement, and…
Transitional living for recovered addicts.
Elijah Rising's mission is to end sex trafficking through prayer, awareness, intervention, and restoration.
To Find Restore Embrace Empower victims of human trafficking. Creating innovative collaborative engagement through multi-sector partnerships targeting vulnerable neighborhoods in cities across the United States.
Into the jordan ministries exists to bring the hope of jesus christ to trafficked and exloited women in southwest florida.
provide a Christian rehabilitation program
Providing hope, healing & freedom from the experience of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse
Restore inmates and those addicted back in to society
Christian ministry to people suffering from sexual, emotional, and religious abuse, mental problems and disorders, trauma, neglect, marital struggles, etc. We work with aspects of dissociation at the root of trauma and childhood issues,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Created Women Inc and the most unlike its peers is Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNDERGROUND CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
- Who funds ALLEGRO ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds ST PETE UNDERGROUND NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Revive and Restore Inc ↗
- Who funds Well Incorporated ↗
- Who funds WEST FLORIDA CENTER FOR TRAFFICKING ADVOCACY INC ↗
- Who funds CREATED WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds TIMOTHY INITIATIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Underground Network Incorporated funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Timothy Initiative Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
- Well Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Underground Network Incorporated?
Find your warmest path to Underground Network Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.