Skip to content
Ulderico & Anna C Milani Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Ulderico & Anna C Milani Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$85kHuman Services$53kHealth$35kHousing & Shelter$31kInternational$22kEducation$21kFood & Nutrition$21kYouth Development$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,300
Median grant
6
States reached
$978k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$6,000
ACT IN FAITH$5,600
GREYS NUNS OF SACRED HEART$5,500
ST FRANCIS DESALES$5,500
ST FRANCIS INN MINISTRIES$5,500
ST JOHN'S HOSPICE$5,500
PHILABUNDANCE$4,400
MOM'S HOUSE$4,400
JOSEPH'S HOUSE OF CAMDEN$4,000
HOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN$4,000
HOLT INTERNATIONAL$4,000
CATHEDRAL KITCHEN$3,600
ST MATTHEW$3,600
RANCH HOPE$3,600
DEBORAH HEART HOSPITAL$3,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%EVERY GOOD GIFT: $2k → 7%PROVIDENCE PREGNANCY CENTER: $1k → 13%THE CITY GATE: $2k → 14%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 15%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $4k → 12%ACT IN FAITH: $6k → 6%EVERY GOOD GIFT: $1k → 7%PROVIDENCE PREGNANCY CENTER: $300 → 13%THE CITY GATE: $900 → 14%HOLT INTERNATIONAL: $2k → 15%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $2k → 12%ACT IN FAITH: $3k → 6%EVERY GOOD GIFT: $500 → 7%THE CITY GATE: $800 → 14%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $2k → 12%ACT IN FAITH: $3k → 6%THE CITY GATE: $800 → 14%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $1k → 12%ACT IN FAITH: $2k → 6%THE CITY GATE: $800 → 14%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $500 → 12%ACT IN FAITH: $2k → 6%ACT IN FAITH: $2k → 6%THE CITY GATE: $800 → 14%MELMARK INC: $600 → 6%MELMARK INC: $600 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
PA
NJ
MD
AR
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$289k · 39 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
9

Total granted

$289k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+22%

Still filing today

46%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR
    6× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +150%
  • AT
    ASSISTING THE COMMUNITY TOGETHER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +111%
  • SJ
    Saint John's Hospice
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • BS
    BERNADETTE SCHLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF THE MAIN LINE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +22%
  • BS
    BERNADETTE SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Pgh

Catholic charities serves to not only meet the immediate needs of the vulnerable within our communities but to provide solutions that embrace a path to stability for those we are privileged to serve. catholic charities is the primary…

Human Services
2
Little Sisters of the Poor Palatine St Josephs Home for the Elderly

The little sisters of the poor operate st. joseph's home, which provides nursing and residential care for the needy elderly. the home is part of the international congregation of the little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france…

Human Services
3
Bethlehem Haven of Pittsburgh

To provide a continuum of care for homeless individuals that leads toward self-sufficiency.

Human Services
4
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
5
Seeds of Hope Ministries Inc

The organization serves by meeting practical needs of the lost while connecting those served to the life changing power of Jesus Christ. Our goals are to assist newly released ex-offenders, to provide meals, clothing and care to the poor…

Human Services
6
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
7
Joseph's House Holding Corporation

To holistically and individually engage people experiencing homelessness in gaining stability and control of their lives.

Arts & Culture
8
Sunday Breakfast Rescue Mission

A living legacy of john wanamaker, philly house's mission is to open their doors every day with a welcoming spirit of christian compassion, walking alongside the homeless, hungry, and hurting of philadelphia so that they may experience the…

Human Services
9
The Baptist Home of Philadelphia

The mission of the baptist home of philadelphia is dedicated to providing quality continuing care living facilities and support services in a christian environment respecting the dignity and sanctity of all individuals regardless of their…

Human Services
10
St Joseph the Worker

Job placement and aftercare services to poor and homeless individuals.

—
11
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Allentown Inc

Catholic charities, diocese of allentown serves as a living expression of christ's love by providing compassionate, professional services, advocacy, and hope to individuals, families, and communities, regardless of faith while respecting…

—
12
Christel House International Inc

Chi prepares graduates of the christel house schools operated by its affiliated entities, which chi funds and oversees, to achieve upward economic mobility, demonstrate good citizenship, and become empowered to identify and realize their…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cathedral Soup Kitchen Inc; the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $17,400 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORST FRANCIS DESALES: $17,350 · OtherST FRANCIS DESALESSaint John's Hospice: $16,450 · OtherSaint John's HospiceST FRANCIS INN MINISTRIES: $16,450 · OtherST FRANCIS INN MINISTRIESSALVATION ARMY: $14,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYMOM'S HOUSE: $14,200 · OtherMOM'S HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $10,950 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGREYS NUNS OF SACRED HEART: $10,750 · OtherDEBORAH HEART HOSPITAL: $9,750 · OtherST MATTHEW: $9,300 · OtherHOLT INTERNATIONAL: $9,000 · Other+22 more: $55,750 · Other+22 moreASSISTING THE COMMUNITY TOGETHER: $16,500 · Human ServicesASSISTING THE …THE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC: $8,400 · Human ServicesTHE CATHEDRAL …City Gate Inc: $5,900 · Human ServicesCity Gate IncEVERY GOOD GIFT: $3,500 · Human ServicesEVERY GOOD GIF…HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesHOLT INTERNATI…+2 more: $2,500 · Human Services+2 moreHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC: $10,750 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $8,200 · EducationRanch Hope Inc: $9,300 · HealthCOLLEEN SORBELLO BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $2,600 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $2,400 · HealthJOSEPH'S HOUSE OF CAMDEN LLC: $6,900 · Housing & ShelterAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC: $6,300 · Housing & ShelterPhilabundance: $11,850 · Food & NutritionCATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $2,200 · Religion
Other$201,850Human Services$39,800Education$18,950Health$14,300Housing & Shelter$13,200Food & Nutrition$11,850Religion$2,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $17,400 over 6y, 23% of budgetASSISTING THE COMMUNITY TOGETHER: $16,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetSaint John's Hospice: $16,450 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPhilabundance: $11,850 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC: $10,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRanch Hope Inc: $9,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC: $8,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $8,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOSEPH'S HOUSE OF CAMDEN LLC: $6,900 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC: $6,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCity Gate Inc: $5,900 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetEVERY GOOD GIFT: $3,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEEN SORBELLO BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $2,600 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $2,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF THE MAIN LINE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROVIDENCE PREGNANCY CENTER: $1,300 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMELMARK INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTING THE COMMUNITY TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds Saint John's Hospice ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Ranch Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOSEPH'S HOUSE OF CAMDEN LLC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds City Gate Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAYMEN'S RETREAT LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds EVERY GOOD GIFT ↗
  • Who funds THE MELMARK CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOLT INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEEN SORBELLO BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE MAIN LINE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia Foun…Catholic Human Servic…Wsfs Cares FoundationConnelly FoundationUnited Way of Greater…Daniels Family Founda…Beatty Helen D Groome…W W Smith Charitable …Oceanfirst FoundationTd Charitable Foundat…Community Foundation …The Blackbaud Giving …
The Philadelphia FoundationPA18.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Catholic Human Services Foundation · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Connelly Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Daniels Family Foundation · Beatty Helen D Groome Uw · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Oceanfirst Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ulderico & Anna C Milani Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ulderico & Anna C Milani Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 32%
  • Joseph's House of Camden Llc: 32% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ulderico & Anna C Milani Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ulderico & Anna C Milani Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ulderico & Anna C Milani’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home