Skip to content

· Public charity

Ujima the National Center on Violence Against Women

To mobilize the community to respond to and end domestic, sexual and community violence in the black community.

$6.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
38
Grants FY2025still arriving
20
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$3.7MHealth$3.3MCrime & Legal$1.7MCivil Rights$1.6MArts & Culture$991kEducation$566kPhilanthropy$373kEmployment$282kOther$0
02FY2025 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $102k
  • $50k–250k29 grants · $3.6M
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.4M
$127,959
Median grant
20
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCESA NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SISTERS OF COLOR ENDING SEXUAL ASSAULT$1,039,542
POSITIVE RESULTS CENTER$286,975
DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$286,959
WELLSPRING GLOBAL FELLOWSHIP$265,000
NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON TRANSFORMATION AND EQUITY$260,275
MOTIVATING INSPIRING SUPPORTING & SERVING$259,685
LAUREN H COLLINS WELLNESS$244,386
ELEVEN 24$239,229
A LONG WALK HOME INC$177,265
BERKSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GROUPS AND EDUCATION INC$176,714
DEEP BREATHS & HEAL$164,701
OUR HOUSE INC$164,610
BLACK WOMEN'S BLUEPRINT$152,016
BLACK SURVIVORS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT INSTITUTE- FKA NIRVANA NOW$149,587
TRANSITION 1 2 3 INC$138,647
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%BERKSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GROUPS AND EDUCATION INC: $256k → 12%AMIRACLE4SURE: $101k → 12%REFINED DETROIT: $104k → 21%SOCIETY OF CLOTILDA-FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF MOBILE: $128k → 19%TRANS WOMEN OF COLOR (TWOC) HEALING PROJECT: $10k → 6%TRANS WOMEN OF COLOR (TWOC) HEALING PROJECT: $142k → 8%THE SILENT TASK FORCE: $176k → 9%OUR SISTERS' HOUSE: $64k → 9%YONNIE HOUSE OF LOVE: $131k → 11%BERKSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GROUPS AND EDUCATION INC: $177k → 12%AMIRACLE4SURE: $92k → 12%REFINED DETROIT: $80k → 21%FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF MOBILE INC: $47k → 19%TRANS WOMEN OF COLOR (TWOC) HEALING PROJECT: $73k → 8%THE SILENT TASK FORCE: $74k → 9%OUR SISTERS' HOUSE: $134k → 9%YONNIE HOUSE OF LOVE: $98k → 11%AMIRACLE4SURE: $86k → 12%THE SAFE SISTERS CIRCLE: $149k → 14%REFINED DETROIT: $63k → 21%SOMALI FAMILY SAFETY TASK FORCE: $137k → 9%OUR SISTERS' HOUSE: $81k → 9%YONNIE HOUSE OF LOVE: $76k → 11%THE HUMMINGBIRD PROJECT COMPANY: $87k → 11%SOMALI FAMILY SAFETY TASK FORCE: $90k → 9%DXT THERAPEUTIC FOUNDATION INC: $92k → 11%TRANSITION 1 2 3 INC: $139k → 21%THE HUMMINGBIRD PROJECT COMPANY: $81k → 11%SOMALI FAMILY SAFETY TASK FORCE: $60k → 9%DXT THERAPEUTIC FOUNDATION INC: $96k → 11%DXT THERAPEUTIC FOUNDATION INC: $85k → 11%TRANSITION 1 2 3 INC: $77k → 21%THE HUMMINGBIRD PROJECT COMPANY: $32k → 11%THE SAFE SISTERS CIRCLE: $126k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
DE
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 36 repeat orgs$698k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
2

Total granted

$12M
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
-6%

Still filing today

92%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $547k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthCivil RightsArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NO
    NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SISTERS OF COLOR ENDING SEXUAL ASSAULT
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +49% · 96% of their budget
  • POSITIVE RESULTS CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $550k · revenue +85%
  • BR
    BERSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GROUPS & EDUCATION INC BRIDGE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $433k · revenue ×12

Funded once

  • BS
    BLACK SAGE COLLECTIVE
    one grant, 2024 · $138k
  • DS
    DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hush No More

We provide support to survivors of sexual assault, domestic violence, child sexual abuse, and incest.

Health
2
Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

—
3
Capital Area Family Violence Intervention Center Inc

To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…

Human Services
4
Siskiyou Domestic Violence & Crisis Center

To provide shelter, counseling and, aid to victims of sexual assualt and domestic violence.

Human Services
5
Black Mental Health & Wellness
Health
6
Restorative Approaches to Intimate Violence

Services and training for domestic violence victims

Crime & Legal
7
Safe Haven Transitional Inc

Provide housing and counseling services for battered women children

Housing & Shelter
8
Domestic Violence Project

The mission of SafeHouse Center is to empower survivors of both sexual and intimate partner violence by providing advocacy, support, and promoting social change within our community.

Human Services
9
Darrell Smith Studios Productions Inc

Stop Domestic Violence and human trafficking

Youth Development
10
Trauma Informed La
Civil Rights
11
Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

—
12
Shining Light in Darkness Foun

Shining light in darkness foundation inc. faithfully cares for suvivor of sexual assault domestic violence and human trafficking especially those in underserved communities providing trauma informed surv

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nisaa African Family Services; the most unlike its peers is Lauren H Collins Wellness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

15
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
22/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BERSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GROUPS & EDUCATION INC BRIDGE: $432,955 · Human ServicesBERSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATIO…Deep Breaths and Heal: $325,000 · Human ServicesDeep Breaths and HealYonnie House of Love: $304,356 · Human ServicesYonnie House of LoveSOMALI FAMILY SAFETY TASK FORCE SOMALI FAMILY SAFETY TASK FORCE: $287,292 · Human ServicesSOMALI FAMILY SAFETY TASK FORCE S…Transition 123 Inc: $279,330 · Human ServicesTransition 123 IncAMIRACLE4SURE INC: $279,199 · Human ServicesAMIRACLE4SURE INCOur Sisters House: $279,163 · Human ServicesOur Sisters HouseSafe Sisters Circle: $275,000 · Human ServicesSafe Sisters CircleDXT THERAPEUTIC FOUNDATION INC: $273,096 · Human ServicesDXT THERAPEUTIC FOUNDATION INCThe Silent Task Force: $250,000 · Human ServicesThe Silent Task ForceREFINED DETROIT: $246,898 · Human ServicesREFINED DETROITTrans Women of Color Healing Project: $224,998 · Human ServicesTrans Women of Color Healing Proj…THE HUMMINGBIRD PROJECT Company: $199,973 · Human ServicesFamily Counseling Center of Mobile Inc: $175,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SISTERS OF COLOR ENDING SEXUAL ASSAULT: $1,650,677 · HealthNATIONAL ORGANIZATION O…Lauren H Collins Wellness: $500,000 · HealthLauren H Collins Wellne…HARAMBE SOCIAL SERVICES: $279,289 · HealthHARAMBE SOCIAL SERVICESBlack Survivors of Sexual Assault: $250,000 · HealthBlack Survivors of Sexu…POSITIVE RESULTS CENTER: $550,000 · Crime & LegalPOSITIVE RESULTS …ELEVEN24 INC: $524,999 · Crime & LegalELEVEN24 INCMOTIVATING INSPIRING SUPPORTING AND SERVING SEXUALLY EXPLOITED YOUTH: $342,037 · Crime & LegalMOTIVATING INSPIR…NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $300,000 · Crime & LegalNATIONAL ALLIANCE…OUR HOUSE INC: $243,000 · Crime & LegalOUR HOUSE INCJUSTICE INNOVATION INC: $82,271 · Crime & LegalE S EMPOWERED SURVIVOR INC: $279,200 · OtherE S EMPOWERED SURVIV…WELLSPRING GLOBAL FELLOWSHIP: $275,000 · OtherWELLSPRING GLOBAL FE…SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY-BATON ROUGE: $266,424 · OtherSOUTHERN UNIVERSITY-…NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON TRANSFORMATION AND EQUITY: $260,275 · OtherNATIONAL INSTITUTE O…BLACK SAGE COLLECTIVE: $137,525 · OtherBLACK SAGE COLLECTIV…DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY: $286,959 · OtherDELAWARE STATE UNIVE…Supreme Transitions: $282,236 · OtherSupreme TransitionsSAFE HAVEN A HOME AWAY FROM HOME: $279,200 · OtherSAFE HAVEN A HOME AW…Angel Wings Out Reach Center Inc: $274,218 · OtherAngel Wings Out Reac…+1 more: $12,952 · OtherTHE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC: $300,000 · Civil RightsSAUTI YETU CENTER FOR AFRICAN WOMEN INC: $299,999 · Civil RightsBLACK SKEPTICS LOS ANGELES: $279,179 · Civil RightsA LONG WALK HOME INC: $578,944 · Arts & CultureNISAA AFRICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $275,001 · Arts & CultureTHE PERSON CENTER INC: $264,999 · PhilanthropyST CROIX FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $224,999 · Philanthropy
Human Services$3,832,260Health$2,679,966Crime & Legal$2,042,307Other$2,353,989Civil Rights$879,178Arts & Culture$853,945Philanthropy$489,998

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SISTERS OF COLOR ENDING SEXUAL ASSAULT: $1,650,677 over 4y, 96% of budgetA LONG WALK HOME INC: $578,944 over 3y, 18% of budgetPOSITIVE RESULTS CENTER: $550,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetELEVEN24 INC: $524,999 over 3y, 31% of budgetLauren H Collins Wellness: $500,000 over 3y, 82% of budgetMOTIVATING INSPIRING SUPPORTING AND SERVING SEXUALLY EXPLOITED YOUTH: $342,037 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetDeep Breaths and Heal: $325,000 over 3y, 87% of budgetYonnie House of Love: $304,356 over 3y, 90% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $300,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetTHE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC: $300,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetSAUTI YETU CENTER FOR AFRICAN WOMEN INC: $299,999 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetSOMALI FAMILY SAFETY TASK FORCE SOMALI FAMILY SAFETY TASK FORCE: $287,292 over 3y, 12% of budgetDELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY: $286,959 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSupreme Transitions: $282,236 over 2y, 61% of budgetTransition 123 Inc: $279,330 over 3y, 38% of budgetHARAMBE SOCIAL SERVICES: $279,289 over 3y, 20% of budgetSAFE HAVEN A HOME AWAY FROM HOME: $279,200 over 3y, 58% of budgetAMIRACLE4SURE INC: $279,199 over 3y, 11% of budgetBLACK SKEPTICS LOS ANGELES: $279,179 over 3y, 68% of budgetOur Sisters House: $279,163 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetNISAA AFRICAN FAMILY SERVICES: $275,001 over 3y, 16% of budgetAngel Wings Out Reach Center Inc: $274,218 over 3y, 33% of budgetDXT THERAPEUTIC FOUNDATION INC: $273,096 over 3y, 44% of budgetTHE PERSON CENTER INC: $264,999 over 3y, 24% of budgetBlack Survivors of Sexual Assault: $250,000 over 3y, 88% of budgetThe Silent Task Force: $250,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetREFINED DETROIT: $246,898 over 3y, 100% of budgetOUR HOUSE INC: $243,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetST CROIX FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $224,999 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetTrans Women of Color Healing Project: $224,998 over 3y, 59% of budgetTHE HUMMINGBIRD PROJECT Company: $199,973 over 3y, 45% of budgetFamily Counseling Center of Mobile Inc: $175,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetJUSTICE INNOVATION INC: $82,271 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $12,952 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Allstate FoundationIL13.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Allstate Foundation · Michigan Coalition to End Domestic and Sexual Violence · Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · East Bay Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ujima the National Center on Violence Against Women funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ujima the National Center on Violence Against Women. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 81%
  • National Organization of Sisters of Color Ending Sexual Assault: 100% of income from government
  • Harambe Social Services: 81% of income from government
  • Delaware State University: 18% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ujima the National Center on Violence Against Women?

Find your warmest path to Ujima the National Center on Violence Against Women through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ujima the National Center on Violence Against Women’s filings →

More from the funding graph