· Public charity
Ujima the National Center on Violence Against Women
To mobilize the community to respond to and end domestic, sexual and community violence in the black community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k3 grants · $102k
- $50k–250k29 grants · $3.6M
- $250k+6 grants · $2.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCESA NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SISTERS OF COLOR ENDING SEXUAL ASSAULT | $1,039,542 |
| POSITIVE RESULTS CENTER | $286,975 |
| DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $286,959 |
| WELLSPRING GLOBAL FELLOWSHIP | $265,000 |
| NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON TRANSFORMATION AND EQUITY | $260,275 |
| MOTIVATING INSPIRING SUPPORTING & SERVING | $259,685 |
| LAUREN H COLLINS WELLNESS | $244,386 |
| ELEVEN 24 | $239,229 |
| A LONG WALK HOME INC | $177,265 |
| BERKSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GROUPS AND EDUCATION INC | $176,714 |
| DEEP BREATHS & HEAL | $164,701 |
| OUR HOUSE INC | $164,610 |
| BLACK WOMEN'S BLUEPRINT | $152,016 |
| BLACK SURVIVORS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT INSTITUTE- FKA NIRVANA NOW | $149,587 |
| TRANSITION 1 2 3 INC | $138,647 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $547k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NONATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SISTERS OF COLOR ENDING SEXUAL ASSAULT4× · 2022–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +49% · 96% of their budget
POSITIVE RESULTS CENTER3× · 2023–2025 · $550k · revenue +85%- BRBERSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GROUPS & EDUCATION INC BRIDGE2× · 2024–2025 · $433k · revenue ×12
Funded once
- BSBLACK SAGE COLLECTIVEone grant, 2024 · $138k
- DSDELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $13k · revenue -6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We provide support to survivors of sexual assault, domestic violence, child sexual abuse, and incest.
Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.
To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…
Violence against women
To provide shelter, counseling and, aid to victims of sexual assualt and domestic violence.
Provide housing and counseling services for battered women children
Special team on the prevention of domestic violence
Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…
Domestic violence abuse counseling
Stop Domestic Violence and human trafficking
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nisaa African Family Services and the most unlike its peers is Lauren H Collins Wellness. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 11 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 24% of your grantees by number, and just 20% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SISTERS OF COLOR ENDING SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
- Who funds A LONG WALK HOME INC ↗
- Who funds POSITIVE RESULTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds ELEVEN24 INC ↗
- Who funds Lauren H Collins Wellness ↗
- Who funds BERSHIRE RESOURCES FOR INTEGRATION OF DIVERSE GROUPS & EDUCATION INC BRIDGE ↗
- Who funds MOTIVATING INSPIRING SUPPORTING AND SERVING SEXUALLY EXPLOITED YOUTH ↗
- Who funds Deep Breaths and Heal ↗
- Who funds Yonnie House of Love ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END SEXUAL VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds THE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SAUTI YETU CENTER FOR AFRICAN WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds SOMALI FAMILY SAFETY TASK FORCE SOMALI FAMILY SAFETY TASK FORCE ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Supreme Transitions ↗
- Who funds Transition 123 Inc ↗
- Who funds HARAMBE SOCIAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SAFE HAVEN A HOME AWAY FROM HOME ↗
- Who funds AMIRACLE4SURE INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK SKEPTICS LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds Our Sisters House ↗
- Who funds NISAA AFRICAN FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Safe Sisters Circle ↗
- Who funds Angel Wings Out Reach Center Inc ↗
- Who funds DXT THERAPEUTIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE PERSON CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Black Survivors of Sexual Assault ↗
- Who funds The Silent Task Force ↗
- Who funds REFINED DETROIT ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ST CROIX FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds Trans Women of Color Healing Project ↗
- Who funds THE HUMMINGBIRD PROJECT Company ↗
- Who funds Family Counseling Center of Mobile Inc ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE INNOVATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Allstate Foundation · Michigan Coalition to End Domestic and Sexual Violence · Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · East Bay Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Impactassetsinc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ujima the National Center on Violence Against Women funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National Organization of Sisters of Color Ending Sexual Assault — 100% of income from government
- Harambe Social Services — 81% of income from government
- Delaware State University — 18% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ujima the National Center on Violence Against Women?
Find your warmest path to Ujima the National Center on Violence Against Women through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.