Skip to content

· Public charity

UDT SEAL Association Inc

A veterans support organization of past and present members of the naval special warfare community designed to serve as advocates to our members by providing liaison with appropriate and existing services in response to their needs.

$464k
Granted FY2019
16
Grants FY2019
7
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2019 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $146,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $464,463 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $318,463 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k9 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $88k
$8,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Virginia Polytechnic Institute$21,000
Old Dominion University$14,000
Virginia Commonwealth University$11,000
San Diego State University$11,000
James Madison University$11,000
University of Virginia$10,000
University of Tennessee-Knoxville$10,000
Tidewater Community College$8,000
University of South Florida$7,000
University of Southern California$7,000
North Carolina State University$6,000
Auburn University$6,000
University of Mary Washington Found$6,000
Christopher Newport University$6,000
University of Texas at Austin$6,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%San Diego State University: $11k → 11%University of Southern California: $7k → 14%University of Texas at Austin: $6k → 10%University of South Florida: $7k → 13%Auburn University: $6k → 15%North Carolina State University: $6k → 8%University of Virginia: $10k → 8%Virginia Military Institute: $6k → 12%University of Mary Washington Found: $6k → 15%Christopher Newport University: $6k → 17%Old Dominion University: $14k → 19%Virginia Polytechnic Institute: $21k → 21%Virginia Commonwealth University: $11k → 22%James Madison University: $11k → 29%Tidewater Community College: $8k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
6/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITY: $21,000 · OtherVIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & STATE UNIVERSITYVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUS: $11,000 · OtherVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUSJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · OtherJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITYSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY: $11,000 · OtherSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITYTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $10,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEERECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $10,000 · OtherRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIATIDEWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $8,000 · OtherTIDEWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $7,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDANORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $6,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASAUBURN UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITYOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $14,000 · EducationOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY EDUCAT…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $7,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFOR…UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON …VMI Foundation: $6,000 · EducationVMI FoundationCHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EducationCHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY…
Other$107,000Education$39,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVMI Foundation: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARY WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VMI Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTOPHER NEWPORT UNIVERSITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationNJ11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization UDT SEAL Association Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from UDT SEAL Association Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $431k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on UDT SEAL Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph