Skip to content
Ud C Wm Trout Fdn 81696 at a glance

· Private foundation

Ud C Wm Trout Fdn 81696

Its FY2017 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.3M
Granted FY2017
59
Grants FY2017
18
States reached
$260k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 59 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $641k
  • $50k–250k29 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+1 grant · $260k
$50,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ALBANS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC SERVICE$260,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$150,000
LISNER LOUISE DICKSON HURT HOME DC$150,000
BISHOP WALKER SCHOOL FOR BOYS$110,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AM$100,000
COVENANT HOUSE FT LAUDERDALE FL CHA$100,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF BELLEVUE$100,000
KIRKLAND NATIONAL LITTLE LEAGUE$100,000
HOUSE OF RUTH$100,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITA$100,000
SMILE TRAIN$100,000
MIKVA CHALLENGE$100,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER WASHINGT$100,000
THE INTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS$100,000
ST DAVID'S CHURCH WASHINGTON DC$100,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ST CHRISTOPHER'S CHILDREN INC: $75k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
VA
MD
KS
TN
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Institute for Experiential Learning Inc

The mission of the washington internship institute is to foster students' intellectual, personal, and professional development through individually tailored, quality internships and challenging academic coursework that take full advantage…

Education
4
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
5
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
6
Children's Hospital

Organization's mission to improve health outcomes for children; be a leader in creating innovative solutions to pediatric healthcare problems; and excel in care, advocacy, research. as the nation's children's hospital, the mission of…

Health
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
9
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
10
Washington & Jefferson College

To graduate people of uncommon integrity, competence, and maturity, who are effective lifelong learners and responsible citizens, and who are prepared to contribute substantially to the world in which they live.

Education
11
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Catskill Animal Sanctuary Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
22/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ALBANS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC SERVICE: $260,000 · OtherST ALBANS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC SERVICELISNER LOUISE DICKSON HURT HOME DC: $150,000 · OtherLISNER LOUISE DICKSON HURT HOME DCCONVENTION OF P E CHURCH OF THE DIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $110,000 · OtherCONVENTION OF P E CHURCH OF THE DIOCESE OF WASHINGTONBOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF BELLEVUE: $100,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER WASHINGT: $100,000 · OtherCOVENANT HOUSE FT LAUDERDALE FL CHA: $100,000 · OtherST DAVID'S CHURCH WASHINGTON DC: $100,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INC: $100,000 · OtherKIRKLAND NATIONAL LITTLE LEAGUE: $100,000 · Other+32 more: $935,448 · Other+32 moreUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…MIKVA CHALLENGE GRANT FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationMIKVA CHALLE…NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationNORTHEASTERN…THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationTHE GEORGE W…A WIDER CIRCLE INC: $25,000 · EducationA WIDER CIRC…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 · HealthST JUDE CHI…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $100,000 · HealthPLANNED PAR…MaineHealth: $75,000 · HealthMaineHealthActive Minds Inc: $25,000 · HealthActive Mind…ABCD INC: $25,000 · HealthABCD INC+1 more: $10,000 · HealthWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesSt Christophers Children Inc: $75,000 · Human ServicesINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION FOR FAMILY LITERACY INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK STATE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC: $75,000 · AnimalsCATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $40,000 · AnimalsHOUSE OF RUTH: $100,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,055,448Education$375,000Health$335,000Human Services$175,000Arts & Culture$150,000Animals$115,000Housing & Shelter$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSE OF RUTH: $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIKVA CHALLENGE GRANT FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetNEW YORK STATE HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 73% of budgetMaineHealth: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION FOR FAMILY LITERACY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFriends of Fort Dupont Ice Arena Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $44,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $41,224 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $40,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetActive Minds Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetABCD INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOME INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF MERCY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWashington Winter Show Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ud C Wm Trout Fdn 81696 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ud C Wm Trout Fdn 81696. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • A Wider Circle Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ud C Wm Trout Fdn 81696?

Find your warmest path to Ud C Wm Trout Fdn 81696 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ud C Wm Trout Fdn 81696’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home