Skip to content

· Private foundation

Tzedek Social Justice Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$292k
Granted FY2021
41
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$911kPhilanthropy$104kHealth$36kHuman Services$36kReligion$36kEmployment$3kEducation$2kOther$0
02FY2021 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k37 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$947k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
LAURA ELENA PADILLA RODRIQUEZ$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LATINO ADVOCACY COALITION OF HENDERSON COUNTY INC: $53k → 12%LATINO ADVOCACY COALITION OF HENDERSON COUNTY INC: $18k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$635k · 19 repeat orgs$495k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2021, 12 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
79

Total granted

$635k
$308k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+71%

Still filing today

37%
1%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $187k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyCivil RightsHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Center for Participatory Change
    2× · 2017–2018 · $71k · revenue +12%
  • FF
    FUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $68k · revenue +39%
  • YO
    YWCA of Asheville and Western North Carolina Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $36k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $16k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ywca of the Lower Cape Fear Inc

Dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
2
Racial Justice Coalition of Asheville Inc

The Racial Justice Coalition includes representatives of organizations in Asheville-Buncombe County with racial justice in our missions. We come together in commitment to racial equity and to advocate for the rights of people of color.

Civil Rights
3
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
4
North Carolina Coalition Against Sexual Assault Inc

The Coalition is a Statewide Forum Providing a Unifying Vision to End Sexual Violence

—
5
Community Industry Value Interactionist League

NC CIVIL is a nonprofit community impact organization that develops grassroots approaches to structural disparities. Our mission is to increase resident involvement, improve organization of resources, and help institutions partner…

Youth Development
6
North Carolina Equal Access to Justice Foundation Inc

In collaboration with the legal community, NCEAJF empowers North Carolinians to navigate the civil justice system.

Crime & Legal
7
North Carolina Aids Action Network

The NCAAN improves the lives of people living with HIV/AIDS and affected communities through outreach and public education, policy advocacy and community-building to increase visibility and mutual support of people living with HIV/AIDS…

Health
8
Womens Resource Center of Greensboro Inc

To promote the self-reliance of women by assessing needs, providing services, and acting as a gateway to community resources; to seek solutions for unmet needs by providing strategic leadership through collaboration and partnerships within…

Human Services
9
Just Economics

Our mission is to educate, advocate and organize for a more just and sustainable local economy that works for all in Western North Carolina.

Community Improvement
10
Alliance for a Healthier South Carolina

Convene and connect diverse stakeholders to align and catalyze efforts to improve health and well-being for communities across South Carolina.

—
11
Southern Center for Human Rights

The Southern Center for Human Rights is working for equality, dignity, and justice for people impacted by the criminal legal system in the Deep South. SCHR fights for a world free from mass incarceration, the death penalty, the…

Civil Rights
12
Equality Nc

Securing equality and justice for lgbtq north carolinians.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca of Asheville and Western North Carolina Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jewish Community Center of Asheville Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $51,880 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYWCA of Asheville and Western North Carolina Inc: $36,402 · OtherUNC AT ASHEVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $36,402 · Other+119 more: $335,201 · Other+119 moreLatino Advocacy Coalition of Henderson County Inc: $71,402 · Human ServicesCenter for Participatory Change: $71,402 · Community ImprovementFUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES INC: $67,602 · PhilanthropyCampaign For Southern Equality: $36,402 · Civil RightsOur Voice Inc: $36,402 · HealthJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ASHEVILLE INC: $36,402 · Religion
Other$809,885Human Services$71,402Community Improvement$71,402Philanthropy$67,602Civil Rights$36,402Health$36,402Religion$36,402

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLatino Advocacy Coalition of Henderson County Inc: $71,402 over 2y, 16% of budgetCenter for Participatory Change: $71,402 over 2y, 18% of budgetFUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES INC: $67,602 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetYWCA of Asheville and Western North Carolina Inc: $36,402 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCampaign For Southern Equality: $36,402 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetOur Voice Inc: $36,402 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ASHEVILLE INC: $36,402 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGREEN OPPORTUNITIES INC: $3,400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASHEVILLE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Latino Advocacy Coalition of Henderson County Inc ↗
  • Who funds Center for Participatory Change ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds YWCA of Asheville and Western North Carolina Inc ↗
  • Who funds Campaign For Southern Equality ↗
  • Who funds Our Voice Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ASHEVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dogwood Health TrustNC21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dogwood Health Trust · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · The Morton and Barbara Mandel Family Foundation · United Way of Asheville and Buncombe County Inc · Wnc Bridge Foundation · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tzedek Social Justice Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tzedek Social Justice Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tzedek Social Justice Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Tzedek Social Justice Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 132 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $2.4M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tzedek Social Justice’s filings →

    More from the funding graph