Skip to content

· Private foundation

Twomey Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2026still arriving
41
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$590k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$876kHealth$358kHuman Services$307kPhilanthropy$306kFood & Nutrition$235kRecreation & Sports$235kReligion$216kArts & Culture$153kOther$0
02FY2026 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k24 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $197k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $316k
  • $250k+1 grant · $590k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CATHOLIC CHURCH$590,000
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION SCHOOL$89,000
ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER$66,000
WARREN COUNTY UNITED WAY$55,000
ST PATRICK'S CHURCH$53,000
WARREN COUNTY YMCA$52,500
GALESBURG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$40,500
WARREN COUNTY FAIR BOARD$35,000
BUCHANAN CENTER FOR THE ARTS$30,000
MONMOUTH ROSEVILLE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$15,000
JAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER$14,500
RAINBOW RIDERS NFP$12,000
UNITED COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #304$10,000
WARREN HENDERSON FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION$10,000
MONMOUTH COLLEGE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–26, $530k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER: $66k → 16%ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER: $57k → 16%ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER: $37k → 16%ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER: $37k → 16%ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER: $32k → 16%ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER: $27k → 16%ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER: $22k → 16%JAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER: $61k → 16%JAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER: $41k → 16%JAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER: $41k → 16%JAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER: $38k → 16%JAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER: $31k → 16%JAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER: $26k → 16%JAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 45 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2026, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
15

Total granted

$3.8M
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+152%

Still filing today

29%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    The Roseville Community Center Inc
    7× · 2020–2026 · $278k · revenue +16% · 86% of their budget
  • JC
    JAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER
    7× · 2020–2026 · $252k · revenue +241%
  • WA
    Warren Achievement Center Inc
    7× · 2020–2026 · $215k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY WARREN COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $30k
  • UW
    UNDERSTANDING WORKS
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2025 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Moniteau County Nutrition Center

Meals on wheels & senior citizens meals.

—
2
Warren County Council On Aging

Maintain a local senior center

Human Services
3
Warren Senior Center

Community senior centerprovide meals to senior citizens & homebound citizens

Human Services
4
Waubonsee Community College Foundation

The waubonsee community college foundation was formed to advance the educational and charitable purposes of waubonsee community college. the primary objective of the foundation is to raise funds for student scholarships and educational…

Education
5
Community Foundation of Warren County

Enhancing and sustaining the quality of life in Warren County through philanthropy.

Philanthropy
6
Senior Services Center of Will County

To enhance the quality of life of the older person, support theirindependence, encourage their involvement in the community, provide analternative to loneliness and isolation and provide a community focalpoint where older persons come…

—
7
Warren County Community Services Inc

Health and Welfare organization serving low-income, senior citizens and others in need of assistance in Warren County.

—
8
Grand Rapids Community College

Employee benefits

—
9
United Fund of Warren County Inc

To operate the annual United Fund Campaign, soliciting pledges from individuals, industry, and other organizations in Warren County. The funds are received and distributed to twenty-one community based nonprofit organizations in…

Philanthropy
10
Rockingham Community College Foundation Inc

Assist and support Rockingham Community College in its efforts to enhance individual and community success through education, employment assistance, and business and industry and cultural development.

Education
11
Raritan Valley Community College

Raritan Valley Community College is an educational community that works to develop critical thinking, foster intellectual curiosity, promote leadership, encourage social responsibility and support personal growth.

Education
12
The Warren County Ymca Foundation Inc

The Purpose of the Warren County YMCA Foundation, Inc. continues to be to provide financial support to the YMCA of Warren County, IL. The Foundation adopted a policy of contributing 5% of the average monthly net asset balance for the…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Galesburg Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Monmouth Roseville Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CATHOLIC CHURCH: $740,000 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION CATHOLIC CHURCHIMMACULATE CONCEPTION SCHOOL: $686,232 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION SCHOOLWarren County United Way: $231,000 · OtherWarren County United WayWarren Achievement Center Inc: $215,000 · OtherWarren Achievement Center Inc+49 more: $997,700 · Other+49 moreThe Roseville Community Center Inc: $278,000 · Human ServicesThe Roseville …JAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER: $252,000 · Human ServicesJAMIESON COMMU…HELPING HANDS OF ROSEVILLE INC: $175,000 · Food & NutritionFamily Outreach Community Center: $35,000 · Food & NutritionGALESBURG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $140,500 · PhilanthropyBuchanan Center for the Arts: $110,000 · Arts & CultureMONMOUTH COLLEGE: $80,000 · EducationCARL SANDBURG COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationRAINBOW RIDERS NFP: $59,000 · Recreation & SportsMERCER COUNTY YMCA: $7,000 · Religion
Other$2,869,932Human Services$530,000Food & Nutrition$210,000Philanthropy$140,500Arts & Culture$110,000Education$85,000Recreation & Sports$59,000Religion$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Roseville Community Center Inc: $278,000 over 7y, 86% of budgetJAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER: $252,000 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetWarren County United Way: $231,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetWarren Achievement Center Inc: $215,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetHELPING HANDS OF ROSEVILLE INC: $175,000 over 7y, 57% of budgetGALESBURG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $140,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBuchanan Center for the Arts: $110,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetMONMOUTH COLLEGE: $80,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWARREN-HENDERSON FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetRAINBOW RIDERS NFP: $59,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetMONMOUTH ROSEVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 7y, 26% of budgetFamily Outreach Community Center: $35,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetMERCER COUNTY YMCA: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetILLOWA COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS TR: $5,250 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCARL SANDBURG COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Roseville Community Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds JAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Warren County United Way ↗
  • Who funds Warren Achievement Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HANDS OF ROSEVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds GALESBURG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Buchanan Center for the Arts ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WARREN-HENDERSON FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW RIDERS NFP ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH ROSEVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Family Outreach Community Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Warren County United WayIL22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Warren County United Way · Pattee Foundation Inc · Addleman Foundation · Community Health Foundation of Warren & Henderson Counties · Galesburg Community Foundation · Ea Mellinger Educational Foundation Inc · Clarks Fork Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Twomey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Twomey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Twomey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph