· Private foundation
Twomey Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k31 grants · $87k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $228k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $186k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IMMACULATE CONCEPTION SCHOOL | $130,500 |
| WARREN COUNTY UNITED WAY | $55,000 |
| WARREN COUNTY FAIR BOARD | $35,000 |
| GALESBURG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| BUCHANAN CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $30,000 |
| JAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER | $26,000 |
| ROSEVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER | $22,000 |
| MONMOUTH COLLEGE | $20,000 |
| WARREN ACHIEVMENT CENTER | $15,000 |
| HELPING HANDS OF ROSEVILLE | $15,000 |
| WARREN HENDERSON FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| PROGRESS ALTERNATIVE SECONDARY SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| RAINBOW RIDERS NFP | $7,000 |
| ST PATRICK'S CHURCH | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $450k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
43 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JCJAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER6× · 2020–2025 · $238k · revenue +241%
- TRThe Roseville Community Center Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $212k · revenue +16% · 86% of their budget
- WAWarren Achievement Center Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $210k · revenue +52%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY WARREN COUNTYone grant, 2023 · $30k
- UWUNDERSTANDING WORKSone grant, 2022 · $15k
- MRMONMOUTH ROSEVILLE CUSD #238one grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Meals on wheels & senior citizens meals.
Maintain a local senior center
Community senior centerprovide meals to senior citizens & homebound citizens
The waubonsee community college foundation was formed to advance the educational and charitable purposes of waubonsee community college. the primary objective of the foundation is to raise funds for student scholarships and educational…
To enhance the quality of life of the older person, support theirindependence, encourage their involvement in the community, provide analternative to loneliness and isolation and provide a community focalpoint where older persons come…
Employee benefits
Enhancing and sustaining the quality of life in Warren County through philanthropy.
Health and Welfare organization serving low-income, senior citizens and others in need of assistance in Warren County.
Providing care and services for senior citizens.
Raritan Valley Community College is an educational community that works to develop critical thinking, foster intellectual curiosity, promote leadership, encourage social responsibility and support personal growth.
To provide affordable, quality, recreation programs to residents of the river valley. activities include basketball, gymnastics, a fitness room, a running track, raquetball, karate, baseball, and soccer.
Scholarships for wallace community college students
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Galesburg Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Monmouth Roseville Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 30. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 12% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JAMIESON COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Roseville Community Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Warren Achievement Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Warren County United Way ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS OF ROSEVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds GALESBURG COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Buchanan Center for the Arts ↗
- Who funds MONMOUTH COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds WARREN-HENDERSON FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW RIDERS NFP ↗
- Who funds MONMOUTH ROSEVILLE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Family Outreach Community Center ↗
- Who funds MERCER COUNTY YMCA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Warren County United Way · Pattee Foundation Inc · Addleman Foundation · Community Health Foundation of Warren & Henderson Counties · Galesburg Community Foundation · Ea Mellinger Educational Foundation Inc · Clarks Fork Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Twomey Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.