Skip to content
Twin County United Way Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Twin County United Way Inc

To raise funds by voluntary solicitation and contributions for nonprofit local, state and national benevolent, charitable, health and social welfare organizatoins and to distribute the funds raised periodically to participating organizations.

$268k
Granted FY2022
17
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Human Services$980kYouth Development$708kFood & Nutrition$406kHealth$324kCrime & Legal$201kRecreation & Sports$24kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2022 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $245,955, the rows itemized in this filing. The $268,415 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $22,460 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k6 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $146k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$968k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF$58,095
YWCA OF LEWISTON-CLARK$23,236
COMMUNITY ACTION PART$19,698
SECOND JUDICIAL DIST C$16,045
FAMILY PROMISE$15,309
WILLOW CENTER$13,547
SNAKE RIVER COMMUNITY$12,293
INTERLINK VOLUNTEERS$12,144
IDAHO LEGAL AID SERVIC$12,000
LEWIS CLARK VALLEY YOUNG LIFE$11,048
THE IDAHO FOODBANK$10,733
VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS$8,995
FIRST STEPS 4 LIFE$7,933
AREA AGENCY ON AGING$7,617
ASOTIN COUNTY FOOD BK$6,603
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $700k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YWCA OF LEWISTON-CLARK: $60k → 11%YWCA OF LEWISTON-CLARK: $57k → 11%YWCA OF LEWISTON-CLARK: $53k → 11%HOMES OF HOPE: $14k → 16%YWCA OF LEWISTON-CLARK: $53k → 11%YWCA OF LEWISTON-CLARK: $49k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PART: $48k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PART: $48k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PART: $42k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PART: $41k → 11%HOMES OF HOPE: $9k → 16%COMMUNITY ACTION PART: $33k → 11%HOMES OF HOPE: $8k → 16%HOMES OF HOPE: $6k → 16%HOMES OF HOPE: $6k → 16%HOMES OF HOPE: $5k → 16%YWCA OF LEWISTON-CLARK: $23k → 11%AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $21k → 11%AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $21k → 11%AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $20k → 11%AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $20k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION PART: $20k → 11%AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $15k → 11%AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $8k → 11%WA-ID VOLUNTEER CTR I: $5k → 11%WA-ID VOLUNTEER CTR I: $5k → 11%WA-ID VOLUNTEER CTR I: $5k → 11%WA-ID VOLUNTEER CTR I: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 22 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
1

Total granted

$2.7M
$13k

Still filing today

91%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEWIS CLARK VALLEY INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $594k · revenue +226%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
    6× · 2017–2022 · $336k · revenue +29%
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LEWISTON-CLARKSTON INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $295k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • R
    ROC
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Valley Foster Care Inc

Operation of a foster family care agency

Human Services
2
Third District Guardian Ad Litem Program

Provide guardian ad litem services in child protection cases for the third judicial district of the state of idaho

Crime & Legal
3
Family Promise of Cowlitz County

To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.

Human Services
4
Lake Chelan Food Bank

The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.

Food & Nutrition
5
Court Advocates for Children of Kittitas County

Trained and supported volunteer guardian ad litems for the children of Kittitas County

—
6
Volunteer Center of San Gabriel Valley

Provide referrals for court mandated community service. offer meal delivery for home bound individuals.

Philanthropy
7
Casa of the Illinois Valley

Provide legal services for children in area.

Human Services
8
Outsiders Inn

Outsiders Inn (OI) provides peer-lead homeless services and operates multiple shelter programs with a recovery focused model in the Clark County, WA area.

Housing & Shelter
9
Willits Community Services Inc

The primary goal of Willits Community Services is to provide temporary assistance services to families and individuals in crisis. WCS also provides referrals to other community or regional resources and gives assistance to clients in…

Human Services
10
Sage Indigenous Law Center

Sage Indigenous Law Center's mission is to provide culturally grounded civil legal aid that protects the rights of Native American parents, children, and communities, while advancing justice and addressing systemic inequities.

Crime & Legal
11
Valley Community Center

To provide meals, health related services, social activities and other services to the local community with a focus on seniors.

Human Services
12
Lake County Food Share Inc

Lake county food share inc is an organization whose purpose is to coordinate and to meet both supplemental and emergency food needs of families and individuals in lake county, oregon.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is For the Children; the most unlike its peers is Valley Meals On Wheels Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $336,457 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIPYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LEWISTON-CLARKSTON INC: $295,182 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCI…Homes of Hope A Christian Nonprofit Corporation: $47,600 · Human ServicesHomes of Hope A Christian Non…+1 more: $20,810 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEWIS CLARK VALLEY INC: $593,897 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LE…YOUNG LIFE: $65,552 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE+1 more: $15,314 · Youth DevelopmentASOTIN COUNTY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION: $169,138 · OtherASOTIN COUNTY FOOD…INTERLINK INC: $82,760 · OtherINTERLINK INCInland NW Council Endowment Foundation: $33,016 · OtherInland NW Council …FIRST STEPS 4 LIFE: $18,898 · OtherIDAHO LEGAL AID SERVICES INC IDAHO LEGAL AID SERVICES INC: $78,572 · OtherIDAHO LEGAL AID SE…+4 more: $50,785 · Other+4 moreSNAKE RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $165,943 · HealthSNAKE RIVER C…WILLOW CENTER INC: $120,612 · HealthWILLOW CENTER…QUALITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $37,474 · HealthQUALITY BEHAV…IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $131,215 · Food & NutritionIDAHO FOOD…VALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $105,888 · Food & NutritionVALLEY MEA…FAMILY PROMISE OF LEWIS CLARK VALLEY INC: $178,133 · Housing & ShelterSecond Judicial District Casa Program Inc: $122,257 · Civil Rights
Human Services$700,049Youth Development$674,763Other$433,169Health$324,029Food & Nutrition$237,103Housing & Shelter$178,133Civil Rights$122,257

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE LEWIS CLARK VALLEY INC: $593,897 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $336,457 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF LEWISTON-CLARKSTON INC: $295,182 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF LEWIS CLARK VALLEY INC: $178,133 over 6y, 25% of budgetASOTIN COUNTY FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION: $169,138 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetSNAKE RIVER COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $165,943 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $131,215 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSecond Judicial District Casa Program Inc: $122,257 over 6y, 11% of budgetWILLOW CENTER INC: $120,612 over 6y, 20% of budgetVALLEY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $105,888 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetINTERLINK INC: $82,760 over 6y, 14% of budgetIDAHO LEGAL AID SERVICES INC IDAHO LEGAL AID SERVICES INC: $78,572 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $65,552 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHomes of Hope A Christian Nonprofit Corporation: $47,600 over 6y, 11% of budgetQUALITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $37,474 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetInland NW Council Endowment Foundation: $33,016 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetWA-ID VOLUNTEER CENTER INC: $20,810 over 4y, 4.2% of budgetGirl Scouts of Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho: $15,314 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS IDAHO INC: $12,476 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFOR THE CHILDREN: $11,086 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Innovia FoundationLewis-Clark Valley He…Brien & Shelly Deatle…The Avista FoundationDutch Bros FoundationIdaho Community Found…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile FoundationFidelity Investments …
Innovia FoundationWA24× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation · Brien & Shelly Deatley Family Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Dutch Bros Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Twin County United Way Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Twin County United Way Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $179k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Twin County United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home