Skip to content

· Private foundation

Twelve Gifts of Birth Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$16kHuman Services$4kReligion$3kYouth Development$1kHealth$1kInternational$1kEnvironment$1kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Young Womens Resource Center$500
Benedictine Sisters of Erie$250
Ahimsa House$250
Girls Rising$250
Chautauqua Region Community Foundat$200
Save the Children Foundation$200
McMahon Ryan Foundation$200
Individual grant recipient$159
Islamic Relief$100
Pet Alliance$100
Ocean Conservancy Inc$100
Feeding America$100
The Nature Conservatory$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Young Womens Resource Center: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
NE
VA
AZ
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10k · 7 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
14

Total granted

$10k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+26%

Still filing today

57%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsEnvironmentEducationHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Benedictine Sisters of Erie
    5× · 2020–2025 · $4k
  • AH
    AHIMSA HOUSE INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $2k · revenue +44%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $1k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • BF
    Books For Africa
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • PA
    PET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -18%
  • UB
    UNITY BAY AREA HOUSTON
    one grant, 2020 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
5
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
6
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
7
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
8
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
9
Arrow

To make grants to charitable organizations and programs that support the achievement of sexual and reproductive health (srh) of the poor & underprivileged women and others in the asia-pacific and elsewhere.

International
10
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
11
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
12
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Santa Monica. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Books For Africa: $14,568 · OtherBooks For AfricaBenedictine Sisters of Erie: $4,353 · OtherBenedictine Sisters of Erie+17 more: $5,119 · Other+17 moreAHIMSA HOUSE INC: $2,000 · AnimalsAHIMSA HOU…PET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $1,000 · AnimalsPET ALLIAN…Save The Children Federation Inc: $1,112 · InternationalGirl Rising: $250 · InternationalISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $100 · InternationalCHAUTAUQUA REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 · PhilanthropyOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $600 · EnvironmentNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $500 · EnvironmentUniversity of Santa Monica: $1,000 · EducationMCMAHONRYAN CHILD ADVOCACY SITE INC: $500 · Health
Other$24,040Animals$3,000International$1,462Philanthropy$1,200Environment$1,100Education$1,000Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAHIMSA HOUSE INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,112 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Santa Monica: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR HUMANISTIC CHANGE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCMAHONRYAN CHILD ADVOCACY SITE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AHIMSA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAUTAUQUA REGION COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PET ALLIANCE OF GREATER ORLANDO INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Santa Monica ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HUMANISTIC CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MCMAHONRYAN CHILD ADVOCACY SITE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Girl Rising ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMIC RELIEF USA ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Twelve Gifts of Birth Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Twelve Gifts of Birth Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Pet Alliance of Greater Orlando Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Twelve Gifts of Birth’s filings →

More from the funding graph