Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Turner Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$130k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$65k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

65% of Turner Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to University Of Notre Dame Du Lac, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Turner Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $130k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
17
13
18
10
19
8
20
6
21
5
22
5
23
3
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$3.7MReligion$954kEducation$790kAnimals$265kEnvironment$162kPhilanthropy$101kFood & Nutrition$55kPublic Benefit$49kOther$0
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $52k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$794k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$65,000
SECOND HARVEST$26,750
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$25,000
PHILADELPHIA ZOO$5,000
EPISCOPAL ACADEMY$5,000
CURE INTERNATIONAL$2,900
HOP ON A CURE$500
UNITY OF NASHVILLE$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELP US ADOPT: $2k → 17%FRIENDS ASSOCIATION: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
IN
PA
NJ
CA
MO
TN
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 36% of Turner Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Turner Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 41% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.6M · 23 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
22

Total granted

$2.6M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+59%

Still filing today

57%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BU
    BRADLEY UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $750k · revenue +5%
  • CM
    CITYTEAM MINISTRIES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $529k · revenue +50%
  • ZS
    ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA
    6× · 2017–2023 · $205k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +228%
  • PM
    PAOLI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +59%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIAgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +59%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
2
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

6
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
Marist University

Marist university is dedicated to helping students develop the intellect, character and skills required for enlightened, ethical, and productive lives in the global community of the 21st century.

Education
9
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
10
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
11
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Wpi transforms lives, turns knowledge into action to confront global challenges, and revolutionizes stem through distinctive and inclusive education, projects and research. (http://www.wpi.edu/about/mission.html)

12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Zoological Society of Philadelphia and the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyVeteran Support ServicesGovernment Accountability R…Early Childhood Education C…Community Arts OrganizationsChild and Family ServicesCommunity Health CentersIndependent K-8 SchoolsChristian Missionary Organi…Land Conservation Organizat…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 56 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%17%10–20yr14%21%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr23%50%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%3%10–20yr14%3%20–35yr13%73%35–55yr23%20%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
10%
4,324/41,968

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
22/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Notre Dame du Lac — $3,715,000 · EducationUniversity of Notre Dame du LacBRADLEY UNIVERSITY — $750,000 · EducationBRADLEY UNIVERSITY+3 more — $38,162 · EducationPAOLI PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $327,400 · OtherPAOLI PRESBYTE…Individual grant recipient — $197,500 · OtherIndividual gra…GREENLIGHT FUND — $100,000 · OtherGREENLIGHT FUN…CHRISTAR — $75,000 · OtherCHRISTARAUDUBON — $59,500 · OtherAUDUBON+34 more — $76,150 · Other+34 moreCITYTEAM MINISTRIES — $529,000 · ReligionCITYTEAM M…CHRISTIANS CARING FOR EGYPT INC — $45,000 · ReligionCHRISTIANS…TELLING THE TRUTH INC — $20,000 · ReligionZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA — $204,992 · AnimalsWillistown Conservation Trust Inc — $160,820 · Environment+1 more — $250 · EnvironmentSECOND HARVEST INC — $54,850 · Food & NutritionSEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATION — $48,600 · Public Benefit
Education$4,503,162Other$835,550Religion$594,000Animals$204,992Environment$161,070Food & Nutrition$54,850Public Benefit$48,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $3,715,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBRADLEY UNIVERSITY — $750,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES — $529,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA — $204,992 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWillistown Conservation Trust Inc — $160,820 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST INC — $54,850 over 3y, 54% of budgetSEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATION — $48,600 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCHRISTIANS CARING FOR EGYPT INC — $45,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetEpiscopal Academy — $36,912 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTELLING THE TRUTH INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWHYY INC — $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPAOLI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BARNES FOUNDATION — $6,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURE INTERNATIONAL INC — $2,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRADFORD LEARNING CENTER — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHELPUSADOPTORG INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR THE CARE AND PRO — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRYN MAWR THEATRE FILM INSTITUTE — $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Borgen Project — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChurch Farm School — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNatural Lands Trust Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds BRADLEY UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CITYTEAM MINISTRIES
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds Willistown Conservation Trust Inc
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST INC
  • Who funds SEAL-NSW FAMILY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHRISTIANS CARING FOR EGYPT INC
  • Who funds Episcopal Academy
  • Who funds TELLING THE TRUTH INC
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION
  • Who funds WHYY INC
  • Who funds PAOLI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE BARNES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds CURE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc
  • Who funds BRADFORD LEARNING CENTER
  • Who funds HELPUSADOPTORG INC
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds FRIENDS ASSOCIATION FOR THE CARE AND PRO
  • Who funds BRYN MAWR THEATRE FILM INSTITUTE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Cornerstone Foundation Inc-ImaPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Cornerstone Foundation Inc-Ima · Chester County Community Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Turner Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Turner Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Turner Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph