· Private foundation
Turner Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $600k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $928k
- $250k+1 grant · $3.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF PENSACOLA | $3,427,597 |
| ANSWERING THE CALL | $147,500 |
| FELLOWSHIP CHRISTIAN ATHLETES | $135,000 |
| WATERFRONT MISSION INC | $125,000 |
| LOAVES AND FISHES | $120,000 |
| CHILDREN OF CHRIST HOME | $100,000 |
| MERCY MEDICAL CLINIC | $100,000 |
| RE-ENTRY ALLIANCE OF PENSACOLA | $50,000 |
| 21 WILBERFORCE | $50,000 |
| CENTRAL ALABAMA FCA | $50,000 |
| HEALTH AND HOPE CLINIC | $50,000 |
| RALLY FOUNDATION | $40,294 |
| PROJECT HOPE RECOVERY CENTER | $40,000 |
| MY FATHERS ARROWS | $40,000 |
| SAVING GRACE WOMEN'S HOME INC | $40,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $361k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
49 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $465k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LFLOAVES & FISHES INC6× · 2020–2025 · $505k · revenue +8%
- FOFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES5× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +87%
- RARE-ENTRY ALLIANCE PENSACOLA6× · 2020–2025 · $190k · revenue +197%
Funded once
- KBKENTUCKY BAPTIST CONVENTIONone grant, 2021 · $25k
- FBFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF DADEVILLEone grant, 2023 · $25k
- PWPASTORS WORKSHOP UCone grant, 2020 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.
Gainesville Community Ministry provides help and hope to families and individuals in crisis.
Family connections christian adoptions exists to assist the waiting children of the world into permanent, loving families. it is our belief that god's love is best expressed in the family. the work of fcca is a living expression of our…
To bring the message of jesus to haiti
We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.
As a ministry of jesus christ, agape's mission is that vulnerable and orphaned children find permanency in safe, nurturing families.
The mission of My Fathers House International Inc (MFHI) is to assist the orphaned and abandoned.
Ministry is a cristian church focusing on spreading the word of god, humanitarian help, reaching out to communities in need, provide financial help, build new churches.
Missions to children in foreign countries
To assist in the rescue and care of abandoned and orphaned children in the developing world and to advocate for them by creating awareness of their plight within Christian churches.
Providing compassion, respect, and loving care to each individual on their unique adoption journey. We commit to honoring and nurturing expectant mothers through pregnancy, birth, and life after placement.
HCM exists to empower the Haitian church to build better communities and relationships between God and man through His Son and to help our Haitian brother to rise above dependencies by achieving personal sustainability through their own…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loaves & Fishes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bighouse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds ANSWERING THE CALL INC ↗
- Who funds Light Evangelism Ministry Inc ↗
- Who funds RE-ENTRY ALLIANCE PENSACOLA ↗
- Who funds HEALTH AND HOPE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds MY FATHERS ARROW INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN OF CHRIST HOME INC ↗
- Who funds BUT GOD MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Child Hope International ↗
- Who funds PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC ↗
- Who funds BIGHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sansing Foundation Inc · United Way of West Florida Inc · Impact 100 Pensacola Bay Area Inc · The Bear Family Foundation Inc · Fred & Marilyn Levin Family Foundation Inc · Landrum Family Foundation Inc · Gulf Power Foundationinc · International Paper Company Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Turner Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Council On Aging of West Florida Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- Pace Center for Girlsinc — 2% of income from government
- Love a Child Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.