How much did TUGG CORP grant in FY2020?

Employment$165kYouth Development$60kEducation$60kCommunity Improvement$27kHuman Services$15kCivil Rights$12kRecreation & Sports$7kInternational$5kOther$85k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

justice

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2020 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

$10k–50k4 grants · $57k
$50k–250k1 grant · $65k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$10k

Total assets

Largest grants

RESILIENT CODERS$65,000
MBADIKA$15,000
KODECONNECT INC$15,000
ONE BEAD PROJECT$15,000
NAACP LDF$11,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$287k · 4 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +305% since the first grant, against +152% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$287k

$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+305%

+152%

Still filing today

100%

90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Youth DevelopmentEducationEmploymentCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RESILIENT CODERS
3× · 2017–2020 · $165k · revenue +305%
M
MBADIKA
3× · 2017–2020 · $30k · revenue +908%
THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND CO FUTURE CHEFS-FISCAL SPONSOR
2× · 2017–2018 · $27k · revenue +34%

Funded once

AR
ART RESOURCE COLLABORATIVE FOR KIDSgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +124%
TI
THINKGIVE INCgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +955% · 25% of their budget
CATIES CLOSETgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +152%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Digital Girl Incorporated

Digital Girl, Inc. is a non-profit organization founded in Brooklyn, NY. DGI is dedicated to empowering the underserved youth of our communities, especially young girls, to pursue studies and careers in STEM (Science, Technology,…

Education

Digital Ready Inc

We activate the creative potential of high school students, especially underrepresented young people, to build tangible pathways to economic opportunities in boston's innovation economy.

Education

Techbridge Girls

Techbridge Girls re-engineers the way BIPOC girls* from marginalized communities experience STEM by catalyzing out-of- school time STEM educators and STEM professionals into equity educators and advo- cates through training and curricula…

Education

Techsgiving Inc

Provide tools and exposure to underrepresented youth to reach their full potential in the tech industry.

Arts & Culture

The Next It Girl

To Help young women African American, Black and of color across the nation discover, pursue, and succeed in technology related careers.

Youth Development

Techie Youth Corp

Techie Youth provides educational services and career guidance to foster kids and at-risk youth demographics, preparing them to become self-sufficient professionals in the fields of technology, I.T. and computers.

Education

G Code Inc

The g{code} house was established in 2017 with the mission of bridging the technology opportunity disparity among women and non-binary individuals of color in greater boston.

Youth Development

Girls Dream Code

Girls Dream Code is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization aiming to empower young girls of color and low-income girls, ages 10-24, to pursue an interest in technology by providing free tech and computer science based programs and resources.…

Education

Girls in Stem

Human Services

Team New England Youth Academy Inc

Team New England Youth Academy Inc. is a youth development organization whose mission is to use tangible experiences as a way to bring youth in marginalized communities out of their comfort zones provide a safe haven for at-risk youth and…

Youth Development

Stem Kids Nyc

STEM Kids NYC bridges the gap between the current school curriculum and the immediate need for schools to prepare students for STEM skills and for jobs that do not exist. We teach PreK-12 students in computer science, engineering, science,…

Education

AnnieCannons Inc

The Organizations mission is to train, prepare, and connect individuals who have experienced human trafficking to sustainable careers in tech. The Organizations core training and workforce development program is designed to economically…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Science Club for Girls Inc and the most unlike its peers is Third Sector New England Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

15/16

Grantees still filing

14/16

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Employment$165,000Other$96,838Youth Development$60,430Education$60,000Community Improvement$26,557Human Services$15,000Civil Rights$11,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA20.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · The Devonshire Foundation · Boston After School & Beyond Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation TUGG CORP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

8get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THINKGIVE INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~18 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 10.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 461826783 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THINKGIVE INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 18 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 25% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Tugg Corp?

Find your warmest path to Tugg Corp through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

TUGG CORP

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?