Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Tmc Health Foundation

The TMC HEALTH FOUNDATION supports the charitable mission of tucson medical center and is dedicated to improving the health and quality of life in our community.

$6.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$6.5M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Health$15MEducation$230kHuman Services$207kYouth Development$50kFood & Nutrition$25kRecreation & Sports$11k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $82k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $192k
  • $250k+1 grant · $6.5M
$26,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$58M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUCSON MEDICAL CENTER$6,472,924
BENSON HOSPITAL$125,000
THE CENTURIONS$66,667
SAN MIGUEL HIGH SCHOOL$26,000
EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE$20,000
TU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES$15,000
TUCSON CONQUISTADORES$10,500
CHILDREN'S CLINICS COMPREHENSIVE CARE FOR KIDS & TEENS$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $126k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Pima Council on Aging: $50k → 15%Emerge Center Against Domestic Abuse: $31k → 15%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $25k → 15%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $20k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 10 repeat orgs$671k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$15M
$468k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+5%

Still filing today

90%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $202k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    Tucson Medical Center
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15M · revenue +17%
  • TC
    TUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $76k · revenue +41%
  • NC
    NORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $71k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • CQ
    COPPER QUEEN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2022 · $125k
  • PJ
    PIMA JTED FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +112%
  • PC
    Pima Council on Aging
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health
2
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
3
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
4
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
5
Tmc Healthcare

Our mission is to provide exceptional health care with compassion.

Health
6
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
7
Pro-Choice Arizona

Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…

Health
8
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health
9
El Rio Santa Cruz Neighborhood Health Center Inc

Improving the health of our community through comprehensive, accessible, affordable, quality, and compassionate care.

Health
10
Tucson Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce

The Tucson Metro Chamber is a membership-based business advocacy and community development organization that represents 1,500 businesses employing more than 160,000 employees in Tucson and Pima County. The Tucson Metro Chamber is committed…

11
Tmc Health Foundation

The tmc health foundation supports the charitable mission of tucson medical center and is dedicated to improving the health and quality of life in our community.

Health
12
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Cochise Community Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is Higher Ground a Resource Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr18%15%10–20yr19%20%20–35yr12%25%35–55yr13%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr18%1%10–20yr19%1%20–35yr12%1%35–55yr13%96%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
14%
582/4,273

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Tucson Medical Center — $14,728,008 · HealthTucson Medical Center+8 more — $345,643 · HealthBENSON HOSPITAL CORPORATION — $125,000 · OtherCOPPER QUEEN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL — $125,000 · OtherSAN MIGUEL CORPORATE INTERNSHIP — $52,000 · OtherPIMA JTED FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationLITERACY CONNECTS — $48,800 · EducationHigher Ground A Resource Center — $29,680 · EducationTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE — $75,690 · Human ServicesPima Council on Aging — $50,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTURIONS — $66,667 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentMOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC — $25,000 · Food & NutritionTucson Conquistadores Inc — $10,500 · Community Improvement
Health$15,073,651Other$302,000Education$178,480Human Services$140,690Philanthropy$66,667Youth Development$50,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Community Improvement$10,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTucson Medical Center — $14,728,008 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBENSON HOSPITAL CORPORATION — $125,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPIMA JTED FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE — $75,690 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC — $71,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetChiricahua Community Health Centers Inc — $69,863 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTURIONS — $66,667 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLITERACY CONNECTS — $48,800 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $44,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR NEUROSCIENCES FOUNDATION — $43,095 over 2y, 20% of budgetHigher Ground A Resource Center — $29,680 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMOBILE MEALS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNAMI of Southern Arizona — $25,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetBag It — $22,665 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S CLINICS FOR REHABILITATIVE SERVICES — $20,020 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ29.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Tucson Medical Center · Arizona Community Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · Tucson Osteopathic Medical Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · Jane E Hendricks Charitable Trust Luan Wagner Co-trustee · Eugene C and Wiletta F Denton Family Foundation · Lohse Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tmc Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph