Skip to content
Tucson Medical Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Tucson Medical Center

Tucson Medical Center's mission is to deliver caring, personalized, quality healthcare to patients and their families in an environment that is supportive, education-focused and compassionate.

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$11M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$11MPublic Benefit$11MHealth$490kHuman Services$168kEducation$131kEmployment$111kArts & Culture$75kPhilanthropy$64kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,692,901
Median grant
1
States reached
$714M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF TUCSON$10,692,901
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $123k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Tucson Jewish Community Cente: $10k → 15%Pima Council on Aging: $25k → 15%Pima Council on Aging: $10k → 15%Pima Council on Aging: $10k → 15%St Lukes in the Desert: $8k → 15%Pima Council on Aging: $10k → 15%Emerge Center Against Domesti: $50k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 16 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
18

Total granted

$12M
$409k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+51%

Still filing today

88%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $158k · revenue +33%
  • TF
    TUCSON FESTIVAL OF BOOKS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $125k · revenue +88%
  • TC
    TUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON
    3× · 2017–2019 · $75k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • AC
    Angel Charity for Children Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $75k · revenue +36%
  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity Tucson Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +97%
  • TC
    TUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
3
United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc

Our vision is a community where every child receives a high-quality education from birth to career, every adult has the opportunity to thrive financailly and in the workplace, and every older person can retire and age with dignity and…

Philanthropy
4
Tucson Medical Center

Tucson medical center's mission is to deliver caring, personalized, quality healthcare to patients and their families in an environment that is supportive, education-focused and compassionate.

Health
5
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
6
Startup Tucson

Working to transform the region's economy through entrepreneurship and innovation.

Community Improvement
7
Arizona Technology Council

To connect and strengthen arizona's technology industry and community, promote state and federal policies that enhance arizona's technology industry, deliver quality content and events to educate those working in arizona's expanding…

—
8
Arizona Theatre Company

ATC's mission is to create world-class theatre about what it means to be alive today - inspiring curiosity and creativity, sparking empathy and joy - bringing all Arizonans together.

Arts & Culture
9
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
10
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
11
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
12
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ymca of Southern Arizona; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PIMA ANIMAL CARE CENTER: $11,099,840 · OtherPIMA ANIMAL CARE CENTERCITY OF TUCSON: $10,692,901 · OtherCITY OF TUCSON+10 more: $247,500 · OtherAmerican Heart Association Inc: $157,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $33,000 · HealthTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $29,500 · HealthTHE CENTER FOR NEUROSCIENCES FOUNDATION: $26,000 · HealthARA PARSEGHIAN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthNAMI of Southern Arizona: $25,000 · HealthBEYOND FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthNORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC: $15,000 · Health+2 more: $17,500 · HealthTUCSON FESTIVAL OF BOOKS: $125,000 · Arts & CultureTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON: $75,000 · Arts & CultureTUCSON NURSES WEEK FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Arts & CultureAngel Charity for Children Inc: $75,000 · Human ServicesPima Council on Aging: $55,000 · Human ServicesTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $50,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $30,000 · Human ServicesTUCSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $7,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $64,000 · PhilanthropyEL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 · PhilanthropyHabitat for Humanity Tucson Inc: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $17,500 · Youth Development
Other$22,040,241Health$348,500Arts & Culture$275,000Human Services$227,500Philanthropy$96,000Housing & Shelter$50,000Youth Development$42,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $157,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTUCSON FESTIVAL OF BOOKS: $125,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetTucson Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce: $110,750 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetAngel Charity for Children Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetTUCSON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC DBA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON: $75,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $64,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPima Council on Aging: $55,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Tucson Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $33,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEL RIO FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPERIMETER BICYCLING ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetYMCA OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $29,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR NEUROSCIENCES FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetARA PARSEGHIAN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetNAMI of Southern Arizona: $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TUCSON INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBEYOND FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTucson Conquistadores Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetArizona Diaper Bank: $17,750 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ARIZONA HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $17,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA: $17,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREID PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $13,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBag It: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTUCSON JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Lukes in the Desert Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING STREETS ALLIANCE: $7,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The Hs Lopez Family F…Connie Hillman Family…United Way of Tucson …Arizona Community Fou…Jewish Community Foun…Tmc Health FoundationBanner HealthThe Foundation for Co…The Intuit FoundationLucille E Williams Fo…Margaret E Mooney Fou…
Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ47.6× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Arizona Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · Tmc Health Foundation · Banner Health · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · The Intuit Foundation · Lucille E Williams Foundation · Margaret E Mooney Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tucson Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tucson Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tucson Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home