How much did Banner Health grant in FY2024?

Education$254MHealth$4.4MRecreation & Sports$798kHuman Services$353kCommunity Improvement$337kPhilanthropy$234kEnvironment$135kYouth Development$54kAnimals$31kOther$3.6M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

maricopamedaeconomic assetseconomymobilizinglivestockpower

2019

personsrenaltreatment cureillnesstownhpecaction

2020

integrativeriopositively impactimpact educationeducation wellnesswellness weldleader

2021

boardkindnessaffectedpreventaroundgreater phoenixillness

2022

livestockbuildingalzheimer'sleadseducationalsportsactivities

2023

engagepinalsafetybowlagriculturalwelfaredenver

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 73 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k21 grants · $148k
$10k–50k43 grants · $791k
$50k–250k7 grants · $748k
$250k+2 grants · $68M

$11,500

Median grant

States reached

$17.7B

Total assets

Largest grants

UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA$67,322,090
MCKEE WELLNESS FOUNDATION$325,000
PERIMETER BICYCLING ASSN OF AM$175,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$170,085
COALITION TO PROTECT AMERICAS HEALTH CARE$125,000
SCHOOL CHOICE ARIZONA$120,000
GREELEY INDEPENDENCE STAMPEDE$57,293
BANNER HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,500
CONNECT MARICOPA$50,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$48,420
CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA$43,200
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$37,250
SUN HEALTH FOUNDATION$35,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES PHOENIX$35,000
FRIENDS OF HORSESHOE PARK$30,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $353k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$262M · 70 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

70 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$262M

$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%

+21%

Still filing today

83%

66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $452k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION
8× · 2017–2024 · $252M · revenue +8% · 30% of their budget
MW
McKee Wellness Foundation
7× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +49% · 64% of their budget
UO
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION
4× · 2018–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +61%

Funded once

UO
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
one grant, 2023 · $162k
UO
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO
one grant, 2022 · $153k
UO
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO
one grant, 2020 · $130k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Arizona Chamber of Commerce and

A statewide advocacy organization that advances arizona business and the arizona economy. the arizona chamber of commerce and industry is commited to advancing arizona's competitive position in the global economy by advocating free market…

—

Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy

Arizona Technology Council

To connect and strengthen arizona's technology industry and community, promote state and federal policies that enhance arizona's technology industry, deliver quality content and events to educate those working in arizona's expanding…

—

Tucson Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce

The Tucson Metro Chamber is a membership-based business advocacy and community development organization that represents 1,500 businesses employing more than 160,000 employees in Tucson and Pima County. The Tucson Metro Chamber is committed…

—

Greater Albuquerque Chamber

The greater albuquerque chamber of commerce works every day to make our community a place where businesses can grow and prosper, where people want to raise their families and where tourists want to visit. as the voice of business since…

—

Arizona Hospital and Healthcare

Advancing charitable & educational goals of az hospital & healthcare trade association.

Health

Tempe Chamber of Commerce

To promote economic growth, be the leading public policy advocate for business, be a strategic partner in intitiatives that improve the quality of life, and provide valued services to its members.

—

Vitalyst Health Foundation

To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals & communities in az.

Health

Arizona Foundation for Women

To advance the status of arizona's women through research, advocacy and philanthropy to ensure their safety, health and economic independence. this includes performing the functions of, or carrying out the purposes of the arizona community…

Human Services

Arizona Bioindustry Association Inc

Azbio supports the needs of arizona's growing life science ecosystem.

Community Improvement

Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans.

Civil Rights

Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce

We catalyze regional prosperity with forward-thinking public policy and intentional economic growth.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Phoenix Leadership Inc and the most unlike its peers is Musculoskeletal-Orthopedic Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.7%1/150

the rest of the field

14%

3,589/26,369

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

115 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

113/115

Grantees still filing

85/115

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$254,346,816Health$4,401,534Other$3,777,805Recreation & Sports$797,500Human Services$352,791Community Improvement$336,500Philanthropy$233,525

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ39.6× affinity28 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Community Foundation For · Mercy Care · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Jewish Community Foundation Of · The Weld Trust · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Tucson Medical Center · Pivotal Foundation · Weld Community Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Banner Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: McKee Wellness Foundation.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 742182919 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on McKee Wellness Foundation, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 64% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Banner Health?

Find your warmest path to Banner Health through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Banner Health

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

115 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Banner Health?

More from the funding graph

Banner Health

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

115 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Banner Health?

More from the funding graph