Skip to content
Tuchman Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Tuchman Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$750
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$120kReligion$104kEducation$51kHealth$33kInternational$24kFood & Nutrition$11kArts & Culture$10kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$360
Median grant
2
States reached
$135k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE OF BETH SHALOM$750
HATZOLAH$360
UPPER EAST SIDE HATZOLAH INC$360
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$180
MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BELEV ECHAD INC: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$114k · 12 repeat orgs$163k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
27

Total granted

$114k
$162k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+35%

Still filing today

42%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureInternationalPhilanthropySocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    2× · 2019–2020 · $23k · revenue +252%
  • TW
    THE WILLIAM J GOULD ASSOCIATES INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $13k · revenue +12%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $11k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • SP
    South Peninsula Hebrew Day School
    one grant, 2018 · $18k · revenue -2%
  • MS
    MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOODgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $14k · revenue +28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
4
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
5
University of Judaism Foundation
—
6
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
7
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
8
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
9
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
11
The Shalem Foundation

To promote and foster the creation of a zionist intellectual infrastructure for the state of israel, the development of a jewish national culture, and the establishment and promotion of intellectual and economic liberty.

Crime & Legal
12
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEBREW INSTITUTE OF RIVERDALE: $22,100 · OtherHEBREW INSTITUTE OF RIVERDALEAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INCSALANTER AKIBA RIVERDALE ACADEMY: $12,800 · OtherSALANTER AKIBA RIVERDALE ACADEMYTHE WILLIAM J GOULD ASSOCIATES INC: $12,800 · OtherTHE WILLIAM J GOULD ASSOCIATES INCSHARSHERET: $10,000 · OtherSHARSHERETBIKUR CHOLIM OF BOROPARK: $10,000 · OtherBIKUR CHOLIM OF BOROPARKAMERICAN COMMITTE OF SHAARE ZEDEK: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN COMMITTE OF SHAARE ZEDEKFRIENDS OF MEIR PANIM: $10,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF MEIR PANIMTEMPLE BETH SHALOM: $8,550 · OtherYOUNG ISRAEL OHAB ZEDEK: $6,800 · OtherYAVNEH ACADEMY & TALMUD TORAH OF PATERSON: $6,000 · Other+17 more: $34,095 · Other+17 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $92,288 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELANDAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $10,500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAE…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropySouth Peninsula Hebrew Day School: $18,000 · EducationSouth Penins…MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $14,000 · EducationMORIAH SCHOO…YESHIVAT MAHARAT INC: $8,000 · EducationYESHIVAT MAH…YESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL LTD (FORMERLY THE MEOROT INST): $1,800 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $23,088 · InternationalALEPH SOCIETY INC: $1,500 · InternationalSharsheret Inc: $10,000 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $610 · HealthFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $360 · Arts & CultureJewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance Inc: $5,000 · Social Science
Other$163,145Philanthropy$103,788Education$41,800International$24,588Health$20,610Arts & Culture$10,360Social Science$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $92,288 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $23,088 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSouth Peninsula Hebrew Day School: $18,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $14,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WILLIAM J GOULD ASSOCIATES INC: $12,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $10,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT MAHARAT INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPART OF THE SOLUTION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL LTD (FORMERLY THE MEOROT INST): $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALEPH SOCIETY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELEV ECHAD INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF B'SHVILAYCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUpper East Side Hatzolah Inc: $610 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds South Peninsula Hebrew Day School ↗
  • Who funds MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD ↗
  • Who funds THE WILLIAM J GOULD ASSOCIATES INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT MAHARAT INC ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds PART OF THE SOLUTION ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL LTD (FORMERLY THE MEOROT INST) ↗
  • Who funds ALEPH SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BELEV ECHAD INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF B'SHVILAYCH ↗
  • Who funds Upper East Side Hatzolah Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundJewish Federation of …The Alan and Elisa Pi…Aviv Foundation IncJewish Federation of …FjcVanguard Charitable E…Jewish Community Fede…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…
Jewish Communal FundNY18.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Alan and Elisa Pines Family Foundation Inc · Aviv Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia · Fjc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tuchman Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tuchman Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Tuchman Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Tuchman Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Tuchman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home