Skip to content

· Public charity

Tua Foundation

The TUA FOUNDATION is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to the support of youth initiatives, health and wellness, and charitable causes.

$197k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Human Services$135kYouth Development$114kEducation$113kRecreation & Sports$97kPhilanthropy$92kFood & Nutrition$27kPublic Safety & Disaster$27k
02FY2023 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $191,988, the rows itemized in this filing. The $196,988 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $184k
$27,197
Median grant
3
States reached
$110k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS OF HAWAII$27,197
ALOHA UNITED WAY$27,197
MAUI FOOD BANK$27,197
HAWAII COMMMUNITY FOUNDATION$27,197
SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA$25,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIAMI$25,000
JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION$25,000
AGILE SPORTS TECHNOLOGIES DBA HUDL$8,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%Big Oak Ranch: $17k → 13%Alabama Sheriffs Youth Ranches: $93k → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF HAWAII: $27k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$275k · 5 repeat orgs$301k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$275k
$162k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
0%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    POLYNESIAN FOOTBALL HALL OF FAME
    2× · 2021–2022 · $47k · revenue +269%
  • NK
    NICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $38k · revenue +80%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST ALABAMA INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $38k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • AS
    ALABAMA SHERIFFS' YOUTH RANCHES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $93k · revenue -16%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BROWARD INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -26%
  • TP
    The Police Athletic League Of North Miami Ingraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $17k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Big Brothers Big Sisters Association of Florida Inc

Big brothers big sisters association of florida strengthens and expands evidence-based youth mentoring services statewide by providing resources, advocacy, and support to 11 local affiliates.

Youth Development
2
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Greater Miami Valley Inc

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth across miami, preble, montgomery and greene counties.

Youth Development
3
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Los Angeles

To help at-promise children and youth in los angeles reach their fullest potential through professionally supported, one-to-one mentoring relationships that strengthen their social, emotional, cognitive and behavioral competencies. youth…

Youth Development
4
Boys & Girls Club of Pbc

The mission of the boys & girls club of palm beach county is to inspire and assist all young people, especially those who need them most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
5
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Orange County and the Inland Empire Inc

Creating and supporting mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of the next generation.

—
6
Big Brothers Big Sisters of East Central Wisconsin Inc

To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Unclassified
7
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Palm Beach & Martin Counties Inc

The mission of big brothers big sisters is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth, helping them achieve their full potential.

—
8
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Triangle Inc

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth. the organization's vision is that all youth achieve their full potential.

Youth Development
9
Big Brothers Big Sisters of America

Big Brothers Big Sisters of America is the nation's premier mentoring organization. The Organization's vision is that all children achieve success in life. The Organization's mission is to provide children facing adversity with strong and…

—
10
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Arizona

To provide quality mentors for children.

Youth Development
11
Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Sun Coast Inc

Our mission: to provide children facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.

—
12
Miami Beach Police Athletic League Inc

The mission of the miami beach police athletic league is to foster positive relationships between youths and law enforcement; as well as cultivate and improve the moral and civic standards of the youth in our community.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of Miami Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lipscomb University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAINT LOUIS SCHOOL: $102,500 · OtherSAINT LOUIS SCHOOLBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST ALABAMA INC: $38,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST ALABAMA …BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BROWARD INC: $25,250 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BROWAR…LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITYHUDL: $8,200 · OtherALABAMA SHERIFFS' YOUTH RANCHES INC: $93,000 · Human ServicesALABAMA SHERIFFS' YOUTH RANCHE…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $27,197 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & …JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesJASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION INCBIG OAK RANCH INC: $16,667 · Human ServicesBIG OAK RANCH INCNICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $38,000 · PhilanthropyNICK'S KIDS FOUND…ALOHA UNITED WAY INC: $27,197 · PhilanthropyALOHA UNITED WAY …HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $27,197 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY …POLYNESIAN FOOTBALL HALL OF FAME: $46,667 · Recreation & SportsPOLYNESIAN FOOTB…SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS…The Police Athletic League Of North Miami In: $16,667 · Recreation & SportsThe Police Athle…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MIAMI INC: $50,250 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTH…MAUI FOOD BANK INC: $27,197 · Food & Nutrition
Other$183,950Human Services$161,864Philanthropy$92,394Recreation & Sports$88,334Youth Development$50,250Food & Nutrition$27,197

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALABAMA SHERIFFS' YOUTH RANCHES INC: $93,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MIAMI INC: $50,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPOLYNESIAN FOOTBALL HALL OF FAME: $46,667 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetNICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $38,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST ALABAMA INC: $38,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetALOHA UNITED WAY INC: $27,197 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $27,197 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $27,197 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $27,197 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BROWARD INC: $25,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetThe Police Athletic League Of North Miami In: $16,667 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC: $16,667 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO13.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Tua Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Tua Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tua Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Tua Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Tua’s filings →

    More from the funding graph