· Public charity
Tua Foundation
The TUA FOUNDATION is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to the support of youth initiatives, health and wellness, and charitable causes.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $191,988 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $196,988 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $184k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN RED CROSS OF HAWAII | $27,197 |
| ALOHA UNITED WAY | $27,197 |
| MAUI FOOD BANK | $27,197 |
| HAWAII COMMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $27,197 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA | $25,000 |
| JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIAMI | $25,000 |
| AGILE SPORTS TECHNOLOGIES DBA HUDL | $8,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PFPOLYNESIAN FOOTBALL HALL OF FAME2× · 2021–2022 · $47k · revenue +269%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST ALABAMA INC2× · 2021–2022 · $38k · revenue +48%
- NKNICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC2× · 2021–2022 · $38k · revenue +80%
Funded once
- ASALABAMA SHERIFFS' YOUTH RANCHES INCone grant, 2021 · $93k · revenue -16%
- BBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BROWARD INCone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -26%
- TPThe Police Athletic League Of North Miami Ingraduatedone grant, 2021 · $17k · revenue +26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Big brothers big sisters association of florida strengthens and expands evidence-based youth mentoring services statewide by providing resources, advocacy, and support to 11 local affiliates.
Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth across miami, preble, montgomery and greene counties.
To help at-promise children and youth in los angeles reach their fullest potential through professionally supported, one-to-one mentoring relationships that strengthen their social, emotional, cognitive and behavioral competencies. youth…
The mission of the boys & girls club of palm beach county is to inspire and assist all young people, especially those who need them most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.
Creating and supporting mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of the next generation.
To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.
The mission of big brothers big sisters is to create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth, helping them achieve their full potential.
Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth. the organization's vision is that all youth achieve their full potential.
Big Brothers Big Sisters of America is the nation's premier mentoring organization. The Organization's vision is that all children achieve success in life. The Organization's mission is to provide children facing adversity with strong and…
To provide quality mentors for children.
Our mission: to provide children facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever.
The mission of the miami beach police athletic league is to foster positive relationships between youths and law enforcement; as well as cultivate and improve the moral and civic standards of the youth in our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of Miami Inc and the most unlike its peers is Lipscomb University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALABAMA SHERIFFS' YOUTH RANCHES INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds POLYNESIAN FOOTBALL HALL OF FAME ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WEST ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds NICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALOHA UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF BROWARD INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS FLORIDA Inc ↗
- Who funds JASON TAYLOR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Police Athletic League Of North Miami In ↗
- Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tua Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Tua Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Tua Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.