Skip to content
TTEC Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

TTEC Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$240kHuman Services$126kYouth Development$75kHealth$53kPhilanthropy$33kCrime & Legal$32kRecreation & Sports$30kCivil Rights$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL MERIT SCHOLARSHIP CORPORATION$5,200
GIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI$3,000
FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER INC$3,000
EAST END UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER$3,000
LANIER HIGH SCHOOL$3,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR$3,000
SOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT$3,000
OASIS CENTER INC$3,000
CHARLESTON CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$3,000
INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$3,000
HOPE HOMES INTERNATIONAL$3,000
Charleroi Area El Ctr$3,000
GOWAN SCIENCE ACADEMY PTO$3,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH AND$3,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE OZARKS INC$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $17k → 17%YAIPAK OUTREACH: $3k → 11%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA: $3k → 18%SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $3k → 19%ADELL FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%URBAN LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITY MO: $3k → 15%GOING GLOBAL: $3k → 11%JUNIOR CHARITY LEAGUE OF CONCORD: $3k → 8%SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $3k → 19%URBAN LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITY MO: $3k → 15%HOPE HOMES INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 8%MONONGALIA COUNTY SOCIETY FOR DISABLED CHILDREN AN: $3k → 19%FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER INC: $3k → 15%CARE TO LEARN: $3k → 15%MONONGALIA COUNTY SOCIETY FOR DISABLED CHILDREN AN: $3k → 19%FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER INC: $3k → 15%FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER INC: $3k → 15%FLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO: $3k → 12%CONNELLSVILLE AREA COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
IL
NY
NV
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$304k · 24 repeat orgs$359k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
83

Total granted

$304k
$324k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+20%

Still filing today

75%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    National Merit Scholarship Corporation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +34%
  • EE
    EAST END UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER I
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +46%
  • FV
    FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER
    3× · 2021–2025 · $9k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • VF
    VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue ×45
  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
    one grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue -66%
  • TB
    THE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE
    one grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens

Youth Development
2
Boys and Girls Clubs of Central Carolina

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
3
Big Brothers-Big Sisters of Metropolitan Chicago

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite and empower the promise of youth. we nurture children, strengthen communities and believe that inherent in every child is the ability to succeed and thrive in life.

—
4
Boys & Girls Club of the Greater Chippewa Valley Inc

The boys & girls clubs of the greater chippewa valley's mission is to inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, caring citizens.

Youth Development
5
Boys & Girls Clubs of Oklahoma County Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most to reach their full potential as responsible, caring, and productive citizens.

Youth Development
6
Youth & Opportunity United Inc

Youth & opportunity united, inc. is a not-for-profit, youth development agency that provides services and leadership to meet the emerging needs of young people and their families in our community. y.o.u. programs are trauma-informed,…

—
7
Boys and Girls Clubs of Middle Tennessee

Boys & girls clubs of middle tennessee's ("bgcmt") mission is to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens. in essence, we seek to save and…

Youth Development
8
Utah's Promise

Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.

Philanthropy
9
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
10
Big Brothers Big Sisters of America

Big Brothers Big Sisters of America is the nation's premier mentoring organization. The Organization's vision is that all children achieve success in life. The Organization's mission is to provide children facing adversity with strong and…

—
11
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
12
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Texas Inc

To help children reach their potential through professionally supported one-to-one relationships with measurable impact.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest; the most unlike its peers is Ukrainians of Colorado. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

74 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 74 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
73/74
Grantees still filing
46/74
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $35,555 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEAST END UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER I: $15,000 · OtherEAST END UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER I+66 more: $229,779 · Other+66 moreColorado Succeeds: $85,000 · EducationColorado SucceedsNational Merit Scholarship Corporation: $30,685 · EducationNational Merit Scholarship Co…THE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE: $16,500 · EducationTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIV…UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $16,500 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INCKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Education+6 more: $18,000 · Education+6 moreNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $16,500 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBAN…FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER: $9,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY VIOLENC…GIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $6,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS ON THE R…MONONGALIA COUNTY SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN AND ADULTS INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesMONONGALIA COU…URBAN LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITY MO: $6,000 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE O…THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S…SCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesSCOTTS RUN SET…GOING GLOBAL: $3,000 · Human ServicesCare to Learn: $3,000 · Human ServicesFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO: $3,000 · Human ServicesJUNIOR CHARITY LEAGUE OF CONCORDINC: $3,000 · Human ServicesADELL FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Human ServicesCONNELLSVILLE AREA COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $3,000 · Human ServicesCity Center Outreach Inc: $3,000 · Human ServicesHope Homes International: $3,000 · Human ServicesSHACK NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesYAIPAK: $3,000 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH AND MORGANTOWN INC: $15,000 · HealthBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthBETTY AND BOBBY ALLISON OZARKS COUNSELING CENTER: $3,000 · HealthWest Virginia University Hospitals Inc: $3,000 · HealthOLIVE CREST: $3,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc: $3,000 · HealthATLANTA RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES INC: $3,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS INC: $3,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,000 · HealthSADDLES OF JOY INC: $3,000 · HealthVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyWOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT AND VOICE: $3,000 · PhilanthropyHands on Atlanta Inc: $3,000 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPY COLORADO: $2,405 · PhilanthropyDENVER JUNIOR GOLF: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoys and Girls Club of Cabarrus County Inc: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH EMPOWERMENT SOLUTIONS CORP: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CHALLENGE PROGRAM INC: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentAndson Inc: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GLACIER COUNTRY: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $16,500 · Civil Rights
Other$280,334Education$172,685Human Services$85,500Health$44,000Philanthropy$33,405Youth Development$30,000Civil Rights$16,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetColorado Succeeds: $85,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNational Merit Scholarship Corporation: $30,685 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $16,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE: $16,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $16,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $16,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF PITTSBURGH AND MORGANTOWN INC: $15,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEAST END UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER I: $15,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNOMI NETWORK INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE OZARKS: $9,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDENVER JUNIOR GOLF: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $6,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMONONGALIA COUNTY SOCIETY FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN AND ADULTS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF KANSAS CITY MO: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFoster Change: $6,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Cabarrus County Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSCOTTS RUN SETTLEMENT HOUSE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY PREP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHBCU FIRST INC: $5,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOING GLOBAL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCABARRUS COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget100 Black Men of Atlanta INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of McAllen Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETTY AND BOBBY ALLISON OZARKS COUNSELING CENTER: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCare to Learn: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PANTRY PLUS MORE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDacula High School Band Booster Club Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWest Virginia University Hospitals Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION WEST VIRGINIA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHALLENGE PROGRAM INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS OF MONONGALIA A: $3,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetWOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT AND VOICE: $3,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER LAS VEGAS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOLIVE CREST: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOSBORN SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCLASSROOM CENTRAL INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGWINNETT COALITION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE LAUREL REGION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Veterans United Found…Community Foundation …Milan Puskar Foundati…The Charlie & Mary Be…The Gap FoundationEnterprise Holdings F…Rick and Marsha Floyd…United Way of the Oza…Robert M - Bobby - Al…Stanley & Elaine Ball…Commerce Bancshares F…Forvis Mazars Foundat…
Veterans United FoundationMO19.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Veterans United Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Milan Puskar Foundation Inc · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · The Gap Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Rick and Marsha Floyd Foundation · United Way of the Ozarks Inc · Robert M - Bobby - Allison Charitable Tr · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Forvis Mazars Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization TTEC Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from TTEC Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to TTEC Foundation?

Find your warmest path to TTEC Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on TTEC’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home