· Private foundation
Tsao Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $11k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $125k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $831k
- $250k+5 grants · $4.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHOC FOUNDATION | $1,640,000 |
| ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,320,000 |
| THE PURPOSE OF RECOVERY | $606,700 |
| CHINA INSTITUTE IN AMERICA | $340,000 |
| RENEWAL FOUNDATION | $261,335 |
| SOUTH COAST CHINESE CULTURE ASSOC | $200,000 |
| HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| CHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE CNTY | $157,500 |
| IRVINE CANAAN CHRISTIAN COMM CHURCH | $138,000 |
| PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY | $75,000 |
| BOWERS MUSEUM | $60,000 |
| SEGERSTROM CTR FOR THE ARTS | $25,000 |
| ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $25,000 |
| WOMENS STEP HOUSE OC | $25,000 |
| CORNERSTONE MARRIAGE AND FAMILY MIN | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $285k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +87% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $649k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCHOC FOUNDATION7× · 2018–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +53%
- POPURPOSE OF RECOVERY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $2.3M · revenue ×23 · 97% of their budget
- IIIllinois Institute of Technology4× · 2021–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +13%
Funded once
- KCKIDWORKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPone grant, 2023 · $175k · revenue +3%
- DFDREAMS FOR SCHOOLSone grant, 2023 · $175k · revenue -35%
- RSRed Songbird Foundationone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -86%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…
Ciis is an institution of higher education that encourages an interdisciplinary approach to learning. over 1,700 students are enrolled in masters, doctoral, bachelor of arts completion programs, and certifications. ours is a mosaic of…
The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…
Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.
California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…
To provide a superior, student-centered learning experience integrating liberal arts and professional education and preparing individuals for lasting achievement and responsible leadership in their careers and communities.
To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…
To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.
The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ancient Art Archive. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PURPOSE OF RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds Illinois Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH COAST CHINESE CULTURAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds ECOLOGY CENTER ↗
- Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE CRAIG SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CHINA INSTITUTE IN AMERICA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHARITABLE VENTURES OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds KIDWORKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds DREAMS FOR SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S STEP HOUSE OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX MULTISPORT INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN FUTURES ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR VENTURE EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Red Songbird Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHARLES W BOWERS MUSEUM CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NET FAMILY SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds YOUNG PEOPLE IN RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds New PATH ↗
- Who funds The Happier Life Project Inc ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION ↗
- Who funds MAKARIOS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Segerstrom Center for the Arts ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES FOR RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds Project Hope Alliance ↗
- Who funds The Salk Institute for Biological Studies ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Sun Family Foundation · Tarsadia Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · The Devto Support Foundation · Argyros Family Foundation · California Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tsao Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Tsao Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Tsao Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.