· Private foundation
Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CIDERHILL FARM | $4,568 |
| THREE SISTERS GARDEN PARTY | $4,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,125 |
| AMESBURY PUBLIC LIBRARY | $800 |
| OUR NEIGHBORS TABLE | $517 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.
17 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $517 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- EAESSEX AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY6× · 2017–2022 · $43k · revenue +53%
- LLLUCY'S LOVE BUS CHARITABLE TRUST INC3× · 2017–2020 · $2k · revenue +40%
PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC2× · 2018–2019 · $2k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- CECASHMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLone grant, 2017 · $1k
- MSMAIN ST CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $1k
- ENESSEX NORTH SHORE AGRICULTURAL TECHNICAL FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -97%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rescue of old english sheepdogs.
NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.
The mission of Wolfe's Neck Center for Agriculture & The Environment is to transform our relationship with farming and food for a healthier planet.
The mission of the northeast human resources association is to lead, advance and influence the management of human resources and its impact on organizational success.
Eastern states exposition is a not-for-profit corporation committed to excellence in providing year-round opportunities for the development and promotion of agriculture, education, industry and family entertainment while preserving our new…
Essex Rescue is committed to being a leader in EMS and to providing our community with excellence in pre-hospital and out of hospital care. We strive for this by maintaining the highest standards of our profession, caring for our patients,…
To support in aiding basset hound dogs.
East End Food is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to support, promote and advocate for farmers and producers, while ensuring everyone in the community can enjoy and be nourished by local food. We envision the East End of Long…
Empowering our members to drive excellence and achieve the highest value in healthcare delivery and the consumer experience.
The Organizations mission is to ensure equal access to healthy, local food to all members of the North Shore Communities in a manner that builds community, fosters connection and promotes dignity and self-reliance.
To protect, preserve and interpret the martime heritage of the lower Merrimack Valley region and how it relates to American History
How this is measured
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ESSEX AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds EQUINE RESCUE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds LUCY'S LOVE BUS CHARITABLE TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds Our Neighbors' Table Inc ↗
- Who funds New England Equine Rescue - North Inc ↗
- Who funds ESSEX NORTH SHORE AGRICULTURAL TECHNICAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ROXBURY STONE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Apraxia Kids ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr. Bigger dots raise more.
- Roxbury Stone House Inc: 29% of income from government
- Our Neighbors' Table Inc: 8% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr’s filings →