Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Virginia · Private foundation

Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2025
5
Organizations funded FY2024
20%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$4,125
Largest grant, FY2025
$4,568
Organizations funded a year
4 to 11
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$288k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 20% of the organizations Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr funded were first-time grantees, receiving 4% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving6$15k17%
FY20245$21k20%
FY20235$17k40%
FY20224$19k0%
FY20217$18k43%
FY20209$13k44%
FY201911$19k36%
FY20189$23k44%
72% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$89kEducation$7kArts & Culture$5kAnimals$5kHealth$5kReligion$1kHuman Services$500Youth Development$160Other$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Essex Agricultural Society$42,67561%
Equine Rescue Network$3,8002n/a
Lucy's Love Bus Charitable Trust Inc$2,22530%
Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc$2,04520%
Our Neighbors' Table Inc$1,77620%
New England Equine Rescue - North Inc$1,25020%
Essex North Shore Agricultural Technical Foundation Inc$1,00010%
Roxbury Stone House Inc$50010%
Apraxia Kids$25010%

Plus 21 recipients with no EIN on record ($107k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEssex Agricultural Society: $42,675 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetLucy's Love Bus Charitable Trust Inc: $2,225 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: $2,045 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOur Neighbors' Table Inc: $1,776 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew England Equine Rescue - North Inc: $1,250 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEssex North Shore Agricultural Technical Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRoxbury Stone House Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetApraxia Kids: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Salem Five Charitable…Cummings Foundation G…Eastern Bank Foundati…Boston Foundation IncNetwork for GoodPaypal Charitable Giv…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Salem Five Charitable Foundation IncMA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr with peer funders

About Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr

How much does Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr give?
Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr reported 6 grants totaling $15,010 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 11 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (55%), Education (4%), Arts & Culture (3%).
Who are Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Essex Agricultural Society ($43k), Equine Rescue Network ($4k), Lucy's Love Bus Charitable Trust Inc ($2k).
Does Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc, Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc), Eastern Bank Foundation.
Where is Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr based?
Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr is based in VA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Trust UW Charles E Larner Jr’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home