· Public charity
Trust II
Payment of medical expenses and care for indigent persons
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UTAH SCHOOLS FOR THE DEAF & BLIND EDUCATION | $20,000 |
| YOUTH IMPACT | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +85% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.
6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- MFMOAB FREE HEALTH CLINIC5× · 2017–2023 · $52k · revenue +255%
- WHWasatch Homeless Health Care2× · 2020–2023 · $38k · revenue +85%
- MFMaliheh Free Clinic2× · 2022–2023 · $23k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- EREPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENTone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +14%
- AOARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY'S ANGLICAN COMMUNION FUNDone grant, 2020 · $13k
- USUTAH SCHOOLS FOR THE DEAF & BLIND EDUCATIONone grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To improve access to quality health and dental care for low-income uninsured men, women, and children in Utah County.
To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…
We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.
To offer afforable access to healthcare for the uninsured and low income population of southern utah. the clinic acts as a safety net of services for those who live 250% below poverty level, including medical care, mental health care, and…
Democracy Means Equality, Freedom & Justice: It means having a representative government. UDC is here to transform Utah politics and ensure that every voice counts.
Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.
To help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement, and education.
The mission/vision of Intermountain Quality Innovations (ImQI) is to advance the improvement of healthcare quality provided to people with acute and chronic conditions, including ESRD, through clinical & logistical support,…
Provide medical, dental, and mental health care and pharmaceuticals to low-income families.
Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.
Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…
Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Ihc Health Services Inc · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Utah Medical Association Foundation · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Val a Green & Edith D Green Foundation · Castle Foundation Co Greg Phillips · Utah's Promise · Ally Charitable Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Trust II funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trust II. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Trust II?
Find your warmest path to Trust II through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Trust II’s filings →