Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Truecos Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$605k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Philanthropy$887kEducation$306kCivil Rights$285kPublic Benefit$262kHealth$91kRecreation & Sports$53kSocial Science$25kYouth Development$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $273k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$3,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEADERSHIP WYOMING$250,000
UNITED WAY OF NATRONA COUNTY$173,375
MOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION$19,500
CASPER COLLEGE FOUNDATION$12,000
COWBOY JOE CLUB INC$10,000
WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION$6,200
AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH$5,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$4,000
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC$3,000
MIDLAND UNIVERSITY$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA$3,000
GILLETTE COLLEGE FOUNDATION$3,000
THE RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF DENVER INC$3,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $4k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
ND
MN
WY
SD
PA
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
TN
DC
OK
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of Truecos Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Truecos Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 32 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
17

Total granted

$1.9M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

66%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyArts & CulturePublic BenefitCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LW
    LEADERSHIP WYOMING
    2× · 2021–2025 · $260k · revenue +192%
  • CC
    CASPER COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $154k · revenue +74%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $75k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • TM
    THE MONTROSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -100%
  • SC
    SHERIDAN COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Washburn University Foundation

The Foundation was created to assist in the promotion, development and enhancement of the financial resources for Washburn University of Topeka, as well as to receive and hold in trust any assets given in benefit of the University.

Education
4
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
5
Montana Technological University Foundation

The mission of the montana tech foundation is to advance the teaching, research and public service endeavors of montana tech by generating private contributions to supplement the institution's state and federal revenues for capital,…

Education
6
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

7
The University of Montana Foundation

The university of montana foundation inspires philanthropic support to enhance excellence and opportunity at the university of montana.

Education
8
Wyofile

Wyofile is an independent, nonprofit news service focused on the people, places and policy of wyoming. recognizing the rapid decline in resources among traditional news outlets, wyofile offers in-depth coverage of complicated subjects and…

Arts & Culture
9
Montana Chamber of Commerce

To create and sustain an optimal business climate, business prosperity and a strong montana economy through advocacy, education and collaboration, working to provide an empowered and educated workforce, reduce business growth obstacles,…

10
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
11
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
12
Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities

Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities accredits institutions of higher education by applying evidence-informed standards and processes to support continuous improvements and promote equitable student achievement and success.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Boys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsPolicy Research and AdvocacyHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Banks and PantriesCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…United Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr13%11%20–35yr15%36%35–55yr16%46%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr13%15%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr13%1%20–35yr15%18%35–55yr16%66%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
10%
543/5,284

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
18/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF NATRONA COUNTY — $869,599 · OtherUNITED WAY OF NATRONA COUNTYGOTTSCHE FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherGOTTSCHE FOUNDATION+35 more — $130,050 · Other+35 moreMOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION — $280,000 · Civil RightsMOUNTAIN STATES …CASPER COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $154,000 · EducationCASPER COLLEGE F…UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION — $74,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WY…COWBOY JOE CLUB — $30,000 · EducationCOWBOY JOE CLUB+6 more — $19,000 · Education+6 moreLEADERSHIP WYOMING — $260,000 · Public BenefitLEADERSHIP WYOM…+1 more — $1,000 · Public BenefitSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $16,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $13,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF DENVER INC — $3,000 · HealthTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION — $19,000 · Recreation & SportsAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $18,500 · Social Science
Other$1,059,649Civil Rights$280,000Education$277,500Public Benefit$261,000Health$32,000Recreation & Sports$19,000Social Science$18,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF NATRONA COUNTY — $869,599 over 5y, 23% of budgetMOUNTAIN STATES LEGAL FOUNDATION — $280,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetLEADERSHIP WYOMING — $260,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetCASPER COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $154,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION — $74,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOWBOY JOE CLUB — $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION — $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH — $18,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $16,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION SCHOLARSHIP TRUST — $7,600 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGILLETTE COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AYN RAND INSTITUTE THE CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF OBJECTIVISM — $6,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL RESEARCH CENTER — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MONTROSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetThe Media Institute — $4,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWYOMING STATE 4-H FOUNDATION — $3,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMIDLAND UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMontana State University Foundation Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF DENVER INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Mary — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PROVIDENCE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER — $1,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWYOMING AGRICULTURE IN THE CLASSROOM — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACCURACY IN MEDIA INC — $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT18.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Verdad Foundation · The McMurry Foundation · The John P Ellbogen Foundation · Daniels Fund · Double 4 Foundation · Wyoming Community Foundation · American Gift Fund · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Truecos Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Truecos Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Truecos Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph