Skip to content
Triumph Group Charitable Fdn Agy Uma at a glance

· Private foundation

Triumph Group Charitable Fdn Agy Uma

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$354k
Granted FY2022
73
Grants FY2022
22
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$266kEducation$243kEmployment$173kHealth$138kPhilanthropy$64kArts & Culture$58kFood & Nutrition$47kPublic Safety & Disaster$45kOther$0
02FY2022 · 73 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k69 grants · $309k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA$15,000
VETERAN'S PATH$10,000
WINGS CLUB FOUNDATION INC$10,000
SEGS4VETS$10,000
DEVEREUX ADVANCED BEHAVUIRAL HEALTH$7,500
ALSACST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPIT$7,500
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PHILADELPHIA$7,500
GREAT MINDS IN STEM$5,750
SOCIETY OF ASIAN SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEER$5,500
PENFED FOUNDATION$5,000
FOUNDATION FOR FREE ENTERPRISE EDUCAT$5,000
MANNA ON MAIN STREET$5,000
SOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEE$5,000
VALLEY FORGE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES$5,000
BOLD IDEA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%OPEN DOORS TO FUTURE POSSIBILITIES INC: $5k → 8%BOLD IDEA: $5k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5k → 14%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES & CHILDREN: $7k → 11%ENJIGO FOUNDATION DBA MAKE SALT LAKE: $5k → 8%MOTHER'S HOME INC: $3k → 10%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES & CHILDREN: $5k → 11%PROJECT HOME: $5k → 22%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $5k → 11%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $4k → 7%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $4k → 7%MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHESTER CTY: $10k → 6%MONTCO SAAC: $5k → 7%MONTCO SAAC: $4k → 7%EXPRESSIVE PATH: $3k → 7%PHOENIXVILLE AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$656k · 30 repeat orgs$574k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2022, 7 since wound down; 50 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
37

Total granted

$656k
$341k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+13%

Still filing today

63%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $234k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’22
Human ServicesEducationHealthPublic BenefitArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BAKER INDUSTRIES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $160k · revenue +5%
  • OH
    OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC
    3× · 2017–2021 · $55k · revenue +41%
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
    2× · 2018–2021 · $50k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $80k · revenue +101%
  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +49%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
2
NextOp Inc

NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.

Public Benefit
3
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
4
Readyone Industries Inc

To manufacture and deliver innovative and high-quality garments for the u.s. military while employing and empowering a disabled workforce in a competitively integrated employment environment.

Employment
5
Amvets (American Veterans)

Amvets is a veterans service organization whose members, having served or now serving in the u.s. armed forces, are united to uphold and defend the constitution of the united states; to safeguard the principles of freedom, liberty and…

—
6
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
7
The Commit Foundation

The commit foundation empowers those who have served and their families to create purposeful and fulfilling transitions by providing personalized programs, resources, and the support of community.

Human Services
8
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

—
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
11
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
12
Goodwill Industries of the Chesapeake Inc

Goodwill industries of the chesapeake, inc. prepares people to secure and retain employment and build successful, independent lives.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Homefront Inc; the most unlike its peers is Enjigo Foundation Dba Make Salt Lake. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
71/71
Grantees still filing
49/71
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAKER INDUSTRIES INC: $160,000 · OtherBAKER INDUSTRIES INCUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $25,000 · Other+74 more: $455,660 · Other+74 moreRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $50,000 · EducationRensselaer Pol…Texas A&M Foundation: $50,000 · EducationTexas A&M Foun…DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERS…THE WINGS CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationTHE WINGS CLUB…+5 more: $25,000 · Education+5 moreTHE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $80,000 · HealthTHE BRYN M…SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $7,500 · HealthSEMPER FI …HEADSTRONG FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 · HealthHOSPITAL HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF WINSTON-SALEM: $5,000 · HealthMACON VOLUNTEER CLINIC INC: $5,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · HealthCARING SOLUTIONS OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC: $5,000 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $36,500 · Human ServicesAmerican N…THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $11,500 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAG…MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHESTER COUNTY: $10,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON W…SENIOR ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER OF MONTGO: $9,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR ADU…MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $8,000 · Human ServicesMITZVAH CI…PROJECT HOME: $5,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $5,000 · Human ServicesPHOENIXVILLE AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5,000 · Human ServicesOPEN DOORS TO FUTURE POSSIBILITIES INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesENJIGO FOUNDATION DBA MAKE SALT LAKE: $5,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesBOLD IDEA INC: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $57,500 · PhilanthropyYELLOW RIBBON FUND INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyAIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyPETER'S PLACE: $55,000 · Youth DevelopmentMENTORS CARE FKA MOVEMENT TOWARD A FUTURE INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHEAST TEXAS: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF TEXAS OKLAHOMA PLAINS INC: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $55,471 · Community ImprovementSOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS: $2,200 · Community Improvement
Other$640,660Education$155,000Health$117,500Human Services$115,000Philanthropy$77,500Youth Development$67,500Community Improvement$57,671

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAKER INDUSTRIES INC: $160,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetTHE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $57,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $55,471 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPETER'S PLACE: $55,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $36,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $16,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASTRAL ARTISTS INC: $15,391 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE BIRTHDAY PARTY PROJECT: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP SPOKANE: $11,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CHESTER COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT EAST: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYELLOW RIBBON FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE WINGS CLUB FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVETERANS PATH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSENIOR ADULT ACTIVITIES CENTER OF MONTGO: $9,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORKSHOPS FOR WARRIORS INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PHILADELPHIA INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE STAR FAMILIES INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT MINDS IN STEM: $5,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ASIAN SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCUSTOM COLLABORATIVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVALLEY FORGE EDUCATIONAL SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINLAND NORTHWEST HONOR FLIGHT: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetJOYJ INITIATIVE: $5,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetBRISTOL ADULT RESOURCE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHOENIXVILLE AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY OF HISPANIC PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEADSTRONG FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOORS TO FUTURE POSSIBILITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMENTORS CARE FKA MOVEMENT TOWARD A FUTURE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCT CYCLING ADVANCEMENT PROGRAMINC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHOSPITAL HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF WINSTON-SALEM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMACON VOLUNTEER CLINIC INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN HELICOPTER MUSEUM & EDUCAT CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA ON MAIN STREET: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENJIGO FOUNDATION DBA MAKE SALT LAKE: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Connelly FoundationGenuardi Family Found…The Philadelphia Foun…United Way of Greater…The Gordon Charter Fo…W W Smith Charitable …Henry Dolfinger 2 Tru…Wsfs Cares FoundationPhillies Charities IncChester County Commun…Sanders Caroline J S …FirstBank Charitable …
Connelly FoundationPA27.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Connelly Foundation · Genuardi Family Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Gordon Charter Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Phillies Charities Inc · Chester County Community Foundation · Sanders Caroline J S Td No 2 · FirstBank Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Triumph Group Charitable Fdn Agy Uma funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Triumph Group Charitable Fdn Agy Uma. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Bristol Adult Resource Center Inc: 94% of income from government
  • Windsor Independent Living Association Inc: 93% of income from government
  • The Village for Families and Children: 50% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • East Litchfield Volunteer Fire Co Inc: 1% of income from government
  • National Coast Guard Museum Association Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Yellow Ribbon Fund Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Triumph Group Charitable Fdn Agy Uma?

Find your warmest path to Triumph Group Charitable Fdn Agy Uma through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2026) is on record and reports $463k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Triumph Group Charitable Fdn Agy Uma’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home