Skip to content

· Private foundation

Triumph Community Development Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$129k
Granted FY2021
12
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Education$336kYouth Development$122kHousing & Shelter$103kHuman Services$72kFood & Nutrition$41kCommunity Improvement$41kHealth$31kReligion$11kOther$0
02FY2021 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $110k
$10,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Advance Memphis$16,350
Angel Street$15,500
Binghampton Christian Academy$15,500
Schoolseed Foundation$10,500
Branch of Nashville Inc$10,500
Junior League of Memphis$10,500
Visible Music College$10,500
Monroe Harding Inc$10,500
United Way of the MidSouth$10,500
MMC-TADP Inc$8,000
Salvation Army Memphis Area Command$5,500
The Arc Tennessee$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%The Arc Tennessee: $6k → 14%DeNeuville Learning Center: $5k → 17%Neighborhood Christian Centers Inc: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$549k · 14 repeat orgs$232k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2021, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
13

Total granted

$549k
$195k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+19%

Still filing today

86%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    Binghampton Christian Academy Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $105k · revenue +19%
  • AS
    ANGEL STREET INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $48k · revenue +16%
  • MH
    MONROE HARDING INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $32k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • Teach for America Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +1%
  • FC
    Frayser Community Dev Corp
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • RM
    Redzone Ministries Memphis
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Family Memphis
Human Services
2
Warriors Center Memphis

Warriors Center Memphis is dedicated to assisting men overcome issues related to substance abuse and/or homelessness. We meet the needs of men such as clothing, shelter, education, job training and rehabilitation.

Housing & Shelter
3
The Collective Blueprint

Our mission is to increase socioeconomic mobility by building pathways to thriving careers.

Employment
4
Nashville Inner City Ministry Inc

Nashville inner city ministry is a christ-centered community organization dedicated to empowering the spiritual, educational and vocational development of at-risk youth and their families.

—
5
Sanctuary Counseling Center

The sanctuary counseling center provides affordable counseling to full-time vocational ministry workers and their families in memphis.

Health
6
Memphis Recovery Centers Inc

Memphis recovery centers, inc. (mrc) provides compassionate treatment services for youth and adults suffering from substance addiction and co-occurring disorders, utilizing professional methods to improve spiritual, physical, emotional,…

Health
7
Methodist Foundation of Mississippi Inc

The foundation exists to cultivate and administer current and deferred gifts for the benefit of ms united methodist related institutions, agencies, local churches, and other ministries for charitable purposes and support and to educate…

Religion
8
Mission Mississippi

To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.

Civil Rights
9
Kings Academy Nashville

King's academy is a pre-k-8th grade independent christian school in nashville, tennessee, providing a classically inspired education to a racially and socioeconomically balanced student body.

Education
10
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Memphis Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Memphis, Inc. sees a world where every family has what they need to ensure the best health outcomes for their children. They provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and…

Health
11
Mercy Housing & Human Development

Empowered by the belief that all people have basic rights to dignity and compassion, our mission at mercy housing and human development is to recognize the need for sustainable, affordable housing for low-wealth families of south…

Human Services
12
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborhood Christian Centers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cancer Card Xchange. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
13/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Binghampton Christian Academy Inc: $104,665 · OtherBinghampton Christian Academy IncMONROE HARDING INC: $32,000 · OtherMONROE HARDING INCSalvation Army Memphis Area Command: $32,000 · OtherSalvation Army Memphis Area CommandFrayser Community Dev Corp: $25,000 · OtherFrayser Community Dev CorpMMC-TADP Inc: $24,500 · OtherMMC-TADP IncTHE BRANCH OF NASHVILLE INC: $21,000 · OtherTHE BRANCH OF NASHVILLE INCRedzone Ministries Memphis: $10,500 · OtherThe Salvation Army of Memphis: $10,500 · OtherJunior League of Memphis: $16,000 · OtherJunior League of Memphis+5 more: $22,650 · Other+5 moreTeach for America Inc: $100,000 · EducationTeach for America IncADVANCE MEMPHIS: $62,600 · EducationADVANCE MEMPHISCARPENTER ART GARDEN: $27,500 · EducationCARPENTER ART GARDENCHRISTIAN BROTHERS UNIVERSITY: $10,500 · EducationVISIBLE MUSIC COLLEGE: $10,500 · EducationARISE2READ INC: $10,000 · EducationFRAYSER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $82,500 · Housing & ShelterFRAYSER COMMUN…MEMPHIS UNION MISSON: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterMEMPHIS UNION …STREETS MINISTRIES INC: $42,721 · Human ServicesSTREETS MI…PALMER HOME FOR CHILDREN: $16,200 · Human ServicesPALMER HOM…The Arc of Tennessee Inc: $5,500 · Human ServicesThe Arc of…HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD OF MEMPHIS: $5,050 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF T…+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesANGEL STREET INC: $47,500 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED WAY OF THE MID SOUTH: $10,500 · PhilanthropySchoolSeed Foundation: $10,500 · PhilanthropyMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$298,815Education$221,100Housing & Shelter$102,500Human Services$69,971Youth Development$47,500Philanthropy$21,000Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBinghampton Christian Academy Inc: $104,665 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRAYSER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $82,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetADVANCE MEMPHIS: $62,600 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetANGEL STREET INC: $47,500 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetSTREETS MINISTRIES INC: $42,721 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetMONROE HARDING INC: $32,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCARPENTER ART GARDEN: $27,500 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetTHE BRANCH OF NASHVILLE INC: $21,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMID-SOUTH FOOD BANK: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEMPHIS UNION MISSON: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPALMER HOME FOR CHILDREN: $16,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJunior League of Memphis: $16,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE MID SOUTH: $10,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN BROTHERS UNIVERSITY: $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISIBLE MUSIC COLLEGE: $10,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSchoolSeed Foundation: $10,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Arc of Tennessee Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD OF MEMPHIS: $5,050 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTERS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH CENTER OF MEMPHIS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Memphis IncTN32.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · United Way of the Mid South · Crews Family Foundation · Thomas W Briggs Foundation Inc · The Kemmons Wilson Family Foundation · The Urban Child Institute · Speer Charitable Trust · Wiseheart Foundation Inc · Jr Hyde III Family Foundation · The Day Foundation · Women's Foundation for a Greater Memphis

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Triumph Community Development Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Triumph Community Development Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Triumph Community Development Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Triumph Community Development Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Triumph Community Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph