Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana

A church whose primary purpose is to spread the gospel of jesus christ to the world

$3.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3.5M
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$49MArts & Culture$6.9MEducation$200kHuman Services$99kPhilanthropy$50kRecreation & Sports$20kOther$7.4M
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,471,592
Median grant
1
States reached
$206M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY BROADCASTING OF TEXAS$3,471,592
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHAD VEACH MINISTRIES: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MT
NY
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$45M · 9 repeat orgs$19M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
45

Total granted

$45M
$19M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-30%
-21%

Still filing today

67%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
ReligionArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    TRINITY BROADCASTING OF TEXAS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $36M · revenue ×21 · 90% of their budget
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $450k · revenue +134%
  • 2C
    2ND CHANCE OUTREACH MINISTRIES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $154k · revenue +25% · 41% of their budget

Funded once

  • TB
    TRINITY BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK
    one grant, 2018 · $10M · revenue -79% · 64% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $2.3M
  • EC
    ENLACE CHRISTIAN TELEVISION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue -30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trinity Broadcasting of Washington

A church whose primary purpose is to spread the gospel of jesus christ to the world

Religion
2
Trinity Broadcasting of Florida

A church whose primary purpose is to spread the gospel of jesus christ throughout the world.

Religion
3
Cccm Media Corp

Religion

Religion
4
Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana

A church whose primary purpose is to spread the gospel of jesus christ to the world

Religion
5
Cross Tv Incorporated

Production of christian information videos for use in outreach missions

Religion
6
Steve Brooks International

Television ministry, crusades, training seminars, conferences, conventions worldwide

Religion
7
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

8
Creative Media Ministries Inc

The organization is committed to proclaiming the good news of the gospel through tv ministry, speaking engagements in various churches, and in various venues. the organization is an international ministry and welcomes support and…

Religion
9
Cts America Inc

To deliver the gospel of the lord jesus christ by broadcasting television

Religion
10
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
11
Ron Susek Continental Christian Crusades Inc

Church conflict resolution. Religious programs on radio,TV and at churches and conferences Missionaries and missions in underserved locales.

12
Paul White Ministries

Present the gospel

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trinity Broadcasting of Texas and the most unlike its peers is Museum of the Bible. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Veteran Support ServicesYouth Sports Booster Organi…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Jewish Community Federations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%3%<5yr16%13%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr10%30%35–55yr13%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%2%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr10%84%35–55yr13%1%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/39
the rest of the field
15%
20,233/136,765

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/19
Grantees still filing
8/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRINITY BROADCASTING OF TEXAS — $36,344,537 · ReligionTRINITY BROADCASTING OF TEXASTRINITY BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK — $10,488,275 · ReligionTRINITY BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK+4 more — $2,011,422 · ReligionIndividual grant recipient — $2,314,678 · OtherIndividual gr…Individual grant recipient — $805,728 · OtherIndividual gr…TRILOGY CHRISTIAN PUBLISHING INC — $465,255 · OtherTRILOGY CHRIS…ROBERT MORRIS EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION — $350,000 · OtherCHURCH UNLIMITED — $300,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY EDUCATIONAL TV — $254,794 · OtherPASSION CITY CHURCH INC — $250,000 · Other+34 more — $2,683,463 · Other+34 moreTHE HOLY LAND EXPERIENCE MINISTRIES — $6,337,654 · Arts & CultureTHE HOLY LAN…JACKSONVILLE EDUCATORS BROADCASTING — $533,198 · Arts & CultureJACKSONVILLE…ROEVER FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 · EducationChad Veach Ministries Inc — $50,000 · Human ServicesLife Without Limbs — $48,888 · Human ServicesMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · PhilanthropyCOSTA MESA COMMUNITY ATHLETICS FOUNDATION — $20,400 · Recreation & Sports
Religion$48,844,234Other$7,423,918Arts & Culture$6,870,852Education$200,000Human Services$98,888Philanthropy$50,000Recreation & Sports$20,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRINITY BROADCASTING OF TEXAS — $36,344,537 over 7y, 90% of budgetTRINITY BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK — $10,488,275 over 1y, 64% of budgetTHE HOLY LAND EXPERIENCE MINISTRIES — $6,337,654 over 2y, 44% of budgetENLACE CHRISTIAN TELEVISION INC — $1,001,422 over 1y, 17% of budgetJACKSONVILLE EDUCATORS BROADCASTING — $533,198 over 1y, 29% of budgetARTHUR BLESSITT EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION OUTREACH FOR CHRIST — $460,000 over 2y, 58% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $450,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROBERT MORRIS EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION — $350,000 over 1y, 54% of budgetSAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY EDUCATIONAL TV — $254,794 over 1y, 81% of budgetROEVER FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 over 2y, 37% of budgetTHE A21 CAMPAIGN INC — $200,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget2ND CHANCE OUTREACH MINISTRIES — $154,064 over 4y, 41% of budgetBILL JOHNSON MINISTRIES — $100,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE BIBLE — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLife Without Limbs — $48,888 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCOSTA MESA COMMUNITY ATHLETICS FOUNDATION — $20,400 over 2y, 6.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRINITY BROADCASTING OF TEXAS
  • Who funds TRINITY BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds THE HOLY LAND EXPERIENCE MINISTRIES
  • Who funds ENLACE CHRISTIAN TELEVISION INC
  • Who funds JACKSONVILLE EDUCATORS BROADCASTING
  • Who funds ARTHUR BLESSITT EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION OUTREACH FOR CHRIST
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds ROBERT MORRIS EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY EDUCATIONAL TV
  • Who funds ROEVER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE A21 CAMPAIGN INC
  • Who funds 2ND CHANCE OUTREACH MINISTRIES
  • Who funds BILL JOHNSON MINISTRIES
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE
  • Who funds Chad Veach Ministries Inc
  • Who funds MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS15.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Trinity Broadcasting of Texas · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Trinity Christian Center of Santa Ana funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
2021222324
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph