Skip to content

· Public charity

Trilogy Health Services Foundation Inc

The mission of the trilogy health services foundation is to improve the lives of current and future trilogy health services employees through educational scholarships, emergency assistance during crisis or natural disasters, and reduce food insecurity through our careshelf.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$142kHuman Services$105kEducation$85kHealth$67kEmployment$25kRecreation & Sports$21kArts & Culture$19kPublic Safety & Disaster$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $155,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,320,955 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,165,955 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC$50,000
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF JEFFERSON COUNTY KENTUCKY$25,000
CROSSING NATIONAL INC$25,000
INDIANAPOLIS PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL INC$25,000
IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC$20,000
MUNCIE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOUISVILLE INC: $25k → 15%YOUNG ADULT DEVELOPMENT IN ACTION INC: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$362k · 5 repeat orgs$266k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +119% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$362k
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+119%
+17%

Still filing today

80%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DT
    DARE TO CARE INC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $142k · revenue +26%
  • FS
    FAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $75k · revenue +282%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $51k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEFFERSON COMMUNITY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +269%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOUISVILLE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -2%
  • YA
    YOUNG ADULT DEVELOPMENT IN ACTION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
3
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
Louisville Collegiate School

Louisville collegiate school inspires academic excellence, extraordinary character and global citizenship.

Education
6
Indiana Institute of Technology Inc

Indiana tech is a private, independent, and non-denominational university. students are prepared for active participation in the complex, global society of the 21st century and are motivated toward a life of significance and worth. about…

Education
7
Leadership Kentucky Foundation Inc

Broadens the perspectives of current and emerging leaders through experiential education that inspires them to advance kentucky.

Public Benefit
8
Kentucky College of Art Design

The kentucky college of art and design opens the door to a creative and productive life through an undergraduate education in the contemporary arts.

Education
9
Endeavor Louisville Inc

Endeavor Louisville is leading the high-impact entrepreneurship movement in Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio, catalyzing long-term economic growth by selecting, mentoring, and supporting the best high-impact entrepreneurs in our region.…

International
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
University of Louisville Real Estate Foundation Inc

To acquire, maintain, improve, leverage, manage, lease, and convey real and personal property for the benefit of the university of louisville.

Philanthropy
12
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Louisville Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DARE TO CARE INC: $141,779 · Food & NutritionDARE TO CARE INCUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVIL…JEFFERSON COMMUNITY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · EducationJEFFERSON COMMUNITY TE…CROSSING NATIONAL INC: $25,000 · EducationCROSSING NATIONAL INCIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · EducationIVY TECH FOUNDATION IN…JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $75,000 · OtherJEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHO…KENTUCKY ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH CARE FACILITIES: $20,000 · OtherKENTUCKY ASSOCIATION OF HEAL…MUNCIE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $10,000 · OtherMUNCIE COMMUNITY SCHOOLSFUNDS FOR THE ARTS: $9,231 · OtherFUNDS FOR THE ARTSTHE SALVATION ARMY: $5,925 · Other21ST CENTURY PARKS INC: $20,780 · Other21ST CENTURY PARKS INCFUND FOR THE ARTS INC: $9,890 · OtherFUND FOR THE ARTS INC+1 more: $5,000 · OtherFAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC: $74,500 · Housing & ShelterFAMILY SCHOLA…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $51,163 · HealthTHE CHILDR…American Heart Association Inc: $5,510 · HealthAmerican H…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOUISVILLE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC …YOUNG ADULT DEVELOPMENT IN ACTION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG ADU…Indianapolis Private Industry Council: $25,000 · Employment
Food & Nutrition$141,779Education$125,000Other$155,826Housing & Shelter$74,500Health$56,673Human Services$50,000Employment$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDARE TO CARE INC: $141,779 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY SCHOLAR HOUSE INC: $74,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $51,163 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEFFERSON COMMUNITY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetIndianapolis Private Industry Council: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOUISVILLE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSING NATIONAL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUNG ADULT DEVELOPMENT IN ACTION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget21ST CENTURY PARKS INC: $20,780 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKENTUCKY ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH CARE FACILITIES: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFUND FOR THE ARTS INC: $9,890 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KENTUCKIANA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

C E and S Foundation IncKY17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: C E and S Foundation Inc · Norton Healthcare Inc · The Gheens Foundation Inc · Brown-Forman Foundation · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Kosair Charities Committee Inc · Cralle Foundation Inc · Republic Bank Foundation Inc · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Louisville Corporate Depository Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Trilogy Health Services Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Trilogy Health Services Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Trilogy Health Services Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Trilogy Health Services Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Trilogy Health Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph